I've updated JIRA versions and the KIP wiki page.
Ismael
On Thu, Mar 2, 2017 at 12:51 AM, Ismael Juma wrote:
> Thanks everyone for the feedback. Since everyone was in favour and we had
> covered this particular case in the time-based release plan[1], I went
> ahead and
+1
Thanks Ismael for volunteering to run the next time based release.
On Wed, Mar 1, 2017 at 4:51 PM, Ismael Juma wrote:
> Thanks everyone for the feedback. Since everyone was in favour and we had
> covered this particular case in the time-based release plan[1], I went
>
Thanks everyone for the feedback. Since everyone was in favour and we had
covered this particular case in the time-based release plan[1], I went
ahead and updated the wiki page to specify the next version as 0.11.0.0.
I'll update JIRA versions and the KIP page soon.
Ismael
[1] "We change the
+1 (non-binding)
On Tue, Feb 28, 2017 at 6:56 PM, Apurva Mehta wrote:
> +1 (non-binding) for 0.11.0
>
> I do agree with Ismael's point that exactly-once should go through one
> release of stabilization before bumping the version to 1.0.
>
> Thanks,
> Apurva
>
> On Mon, Feb
+1 (non-binding) for 0.11.0
I do agree with Ismael's point that exactly-once should go through one
release of stabilization before bumping the version to 1.0.
Thanks,
Apurva
On Mon, Feb 27, 2017 at 7:47 PM, Ismael Juma wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> With 0.10.2.0 out of the way, I
+1
Sounds good to me. Thanks, Ismael.
-Bill
On Tue, Feb 28, 2017 at 1:01 PM, Colin McCabe wrote:
> +1 (non-binding).
>
> Thanks, Ismael.
>
> cheers,
> Colin
>
>
> On Mon, Feb 27, 2017, at 19:47, Ismael Juma wrote:
> > Hi all,
> >
> > With 0.10.2.0 out of the way, I would
+1 (non-binding).
Thanks, Ismael.
cheers,
Colin
On Mon, Feb 27, 2017, at 19:47, Ismael Juma wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> With 0.10.2.0 out of the way, I would like to volunteer to be the release
> manager for our next time-based release. See https://cwiki.apache.org/c
>
> > > >
> > > > > +1 on 0.11.0.0.
> > > > >
> > > > > Can we also include KIP-54 to the list?
> > > > > The PR for this KIP is ready for review.
> > > > >
> > > > > Thanks.
> > > > > --Va
0.11.0.0.
> > > >
> > > > Can we also include KIP-54 to the list?
> > > > The PR for this KIP is ready for review.
> > > >
> > > > Thanks.
> > > > --Vahid
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> >
>
> > > > Can we also include KIP-54 to the list?
> > > > The PR for this KIP is ready for review.
> > > >
> > > > Thanks.
> > > > --Vahid
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > &
Hi Jeff,
I share your desire to streamline the experience and remove options that
don't make sense to new users. I should, however, point out that we won't
be able to remove the old consumers in 0.11.0.0 as they haven't been
deprecated yet. Hopefully that will happen in 0.12.0.0/1.0.0.
Ismael
st?
> > > The PR for this KIP is ready for review.
> > >
> > > Thanks.
> > > --Vahid
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > From: Ismael Juma <ism...@juma.me.uk>
> > > To: dev@kafka.apache.org
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > From: Ismael Juma <ism...@juma.me.uk>
> > To: dev@kafka.apache.org
> > Date: 02/27/2017 07:47 PM
> > Subject:[DISCUSS] 0.10.3.0/0.11.0.0 release planning
> > Sent by:isma...@gmail.com
> >
review.
>
> Thanks.
> --Vahid
>
>
>
>
>
> From: Ismael Juma <ism...@juma.me.uk>
> To: dev@kafka.apache.org
> Date: 02/27/2017 07:47 PM
> Subject:[DISCUSS] 0.10.3.0/0.11.0.0 release planning
> Sent by:isma...@gmail.com
>
>
&g
sm...@juma.me.uk>
> To: dev@kafka.apache.org
> Date: 02/27/2017 07:47 PM
> Subject:[DISCUSS] 0.10.3.0/0.11.0.0 release planning
> Sent by:isma...@gmail.com
>
>
>
> Hi all,
>
> With 0.10.2.0 out of the way, I would like to volunteer to be the
+1 on 0.11.0.0.
Can we also include KIP-54 to the list?
The PR for this KIP is ready for review.
Thanks.
--Vahid
From: Ismael Juma <ism...@juma.me.uk>
To: dev@kafka.apache.org
Date: 02/27/2017 07:47 PM
Subject: [DISCUSS] 0.10.3.0/0.11.0.0 release plannin
+1 for 0.11.0.0
Guozhang
On Mon, Feb 27, 2017 at 8:14 PM, Becket Qin wrote:
> Hi Ismael,
>
> Thanks for volunteering on the new release.
>
> I think 0.11.0.0 makes a lot of sense given the new big features we are
> intended to include.
>
> Thanks,
>
> Jiangjie (Becket)
+1 for major version bump.
A good bit of deprecated code I would like to see removed especially on old
consumer side plus a few other settings defaults changed such as the brief
discussion on mirrormaker options a few months back. Just be good to
continue to make the new user experience a lot
Hi Ismael,
Thanks for volunteering on the new release.
I think 0.11.0.0 makes a lot of sense given the new big features we are
intended to include.
Thanks,
Jiangjie (Becket) Qin
On Mon, Feb 27, 2017 at 7:47 PM, Ismael Juma wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> With 0.10.2.0 out of the
Hi all,
With 0.10.2.0 out of the way, I would like to volunteer to be the release
manager for our next time-based release. See https://cwiki.apache.org/c
onfluence/display/KAFKA/Time+Based+Release+Plan if you missed previous
communication on time-based releases or need a reminder.
I put together
20 matches
Mail list logo