Re: [DISCUSS] Conventional commits

2023-06-08 Thread Chris Egerton
Hi Ismael, I haven't worked on too many projects with conventional commits before, so forgive my ignorance. Could you share some of the advantages of this style of commit message over the existing style? Cheers, Chris On Thu, Jun 8, 2023 at 12:34 PM Ismael Juma wrote: > Hi Josep and Bruno, >

Re: [DISCUSS] Conventional commits

2023-06-08 Thread Ismael Juma
Hi Josep and Bruno, Thanks for the initial feedback, these are good questions. Let's give it a few days for others to chime in. If there is general consensus that this is worth pursuing, my thinking is that we'll need to find a volunteer to capture the specifics of how we would use this approach

Re: [DISCUSS] Conventional commits

2023-06-08 Thread Bruno Cadonna
Hi Ismael, Thanks for bringing this up! In general, I am in favor of more structured commits. Even better if the conventional commits specification favors to split commits into smaller commits by concern as described in the FAQs. Additionally to Josep's questions, I have the following questi

Re: [DISCUSS] Conventional commits

2023-06-08 Thread Josep Prat
Hi Ismael, Thanks for raising this topic Ismael, I like the idea, I think this would bring some more meaningful first-liners on the commits. I guess we could use the scope (what comes within parentheses) to indicate the module the commit refers to (if it's single module) However, I doubt if this c

[DISCUSS] Conventional commits

2023-06-07 Thread Ismael Juma
Hi, A number of open source projects have adopted the conventional commits specification. What do people think about using this for Apache Kafka? https://www.conventionalcommits.org/en/v1.0.0/ Thanks, Ismael