Hi Divij, I added this clarification and will start a vote soon.
Thanks.
On Mon, May 15, 2023 at 5:24 PM Divij Vaidya wrote:
>
> Thanks for providing answers to my suggestions folks.
>
> Based on your answers, it seems like the KIP wants to do, relative duration
> = (now - timestamp), where "now
Thanks for providing answers to my suggestions folks.
Based on your answers, it seems like the KIP wants to do, relative duration
= (now - timestamp), where "now" is in UTC (and not in your machine's
locale/timezone). Perhaps, it's worth clarifying in the KIP?
Other than that, no more comments fro
Hi Divij, thanks for having a look.
On Wed, May 10, 2023 at 8:03 PM Divij Vaidya wrote:
>
> Thank you for the KIP.
>
> The current proposal has the limitation that it uses a duration syntax for
> representation of a timestamp. Also, the syntax relies on the locale and
> timezone of the caller mac
Hi Fede,
Thanks for the KIP.
LGTM.
@Divij
I think the timestamp is timezone independent, so it should be fine.
Luke
On Thu, May 11, 2023 at 2:04 AM Divij Vaidya
wrote:
> Thank you for the KIP.
>
> The current proposal has the limitation that it uses a duration syntax for
> representation of a
Thank you for the KIP.
The current proposal has the limitation that it uses a duration syntax for
representation of a timestamp. Also, the syntax relies on the locale and
timezone of the caller machine. This makes it difficult to share the output
with others. As an example, let's say you want to s
Hi all, I'd like to start a new discussion thread on KIP-927: Improve
the kafka-metadata-quorum output.
https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/KAFKA/KIP-927%3A+Improve+the+kafka-metadata-quorum+output
This KIP is small and proposes to add a new optional flag to have a
human-readable timestam
