Re: [DISCUSS] KIP 88: DescribeGroups Protocol Update

2016-11-09 Thread Jason Gustafson
tFetch API would not address the > second (but minor) problem described in the current KIP (the dummy group > member). I assume that is not a big concern. > > Thanks. > --Vahid > > > > > From: Jason Gustafson <ja...@confluent.io> > To: dev@kafka.apache.org &g

Re: [DISCUSS] KIP 88: DescribeGroups Protocol Update

2016-11-07 Thread Vahid S Hashemian
in the current KIP (the dummy group member). I assume that is not a big concern. Thanks. --Vahid From: Jason Gustafson <ja...@confluent.io> To: dev@kafka.apache.org Date: 11/07/2016 09:19 AM Subject: Re: [DISCUSS] KIP 88: DescribeGroups Protocol Update Hey Vahid,

Re: [DISCUSS] KIP 88: DescribeGroups Protocol Update

2016-11-07 Thread Jason Gustafson
Hey Vahid, Thanks for the KIP. If I understand correctly, the problem is how to fetch existing offsets for a group which has no active members, right? I'm not totally clear why we need to modify the DescribeGroups API in order to achieve this since we already have the OffsetFetch API. I think the

[DISCUSS] KIP 88: DescribeGroups Protocol Update

2016-11-03 Thread Vahid S Hashemian
Hi all, I started a new KIP under https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/KAFKA/KIP-88%3A+DescribeGroups+Protocol+Update . The KIP is a proposal to update the DescribeGroups protocol to address KAFKA-3853 (https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/KAFKA-3853). I appreciate your feedback.