Re: [VOTE] 2.6.2 RC0

Closing this vote, please refer to the [VOTE] 2.6.2 RC1 thread On Wed, Mar 31, 2021 at 3:41 PM Justin Mclean wrote: > Hi, > > > Can you clarify a few things? > > Sorry I'm not subscribed to this list and only just saw this. > > > - On the first point, the only thing I see is zstd, which we do

Re: [VOTE] 2.6.2 RC0

Hi, > Can you clarify a few things? Sorry I'm not subscribed to this list and only just saw this. > - On the first point, the only thing I see is zstd, which we do not, in > fact, ship the library itself, just the jni bindings. Was there anything > else you saw? In the source release you are

Re: [kafka-clients] [VOTE] 2.6.2 RC0

gt; Kind regards > Georg > > -Original Message- > From: Sophie Blee-Goldman > Sent: Friday, March 19, 2021 11:44 PM > To: Bruno Cadonna > Cc: dev ; us...@kafka.apache.org; > kafka-clie...@googlegroups.com > Subject: Re: [kafka-clients] [VOTE] 2.6.2 RC0 > >

Re: [VOTE] 2.6.2 RC0

Hi Justin, Thanks for bringing this up and for your advice in resolving it. I've carved out the specific chunk of work relating to copyright, and wanted to call your attention to a specific proposal I have to fix this situation:

RE: [kafka-clients] [VOTE] 2.6.2 RC0

] [VOTE] 2.6.2 RC0 Thanks Bruno. I agree this qualifies as a blocker since it was a regression in 2.6 and may result in data loss. I'll roll a new RC with the fix On Fri, Mar 19, 2021 at 7:03 AM 'Bruno Cadonna' via kafka-clients < kafka-clie...@googlegroups.com> wrote: > Hi Sophie, >

Re: [VOTE] 2.6.2 RC0

HI, > - On the first point, the only thing I see is zstd, which we do not, in > fact, ship the library itself, just the jni bindings. Was there anything > else you saw? As far as I can see all of the software mentioned is not in the source release so shouldn't be mentioned in LICENSE, but I'm

Re: [VOTE] 2.6.2 RC0

Hey Justin, Can you clarify a few things? - On the first point, the only thing I see is zstd, which we do not, in fact, ship the library itself, just the jni bindings. Was there anything else you saw? - On the second point, I checked the src download from the RC and afaict we use this header and

Re: [VOTE] 2.6.2 RC0

Hi, I was taking a look at this release candidate and noticed a number of things from a licensing compliance point of view the set a little odd. Now there may be some history here that I'm unaware of and a good reason why things are like this. I can see: - The LICENSE files include things

Re: [kafka-clients] [VOTE] 2.6.2 RC0

Thanks Bruno. I agree this qualifies as a blocker since it was a regression in 2.6 and may result in data loss. I'll roll a new RC with the fix On Fri, Mar 19, 2021 at 7:03 AM 'Bruno Cadonna' via kafka-clients < kafka-clie...@googlegroups.com> wrote: > Hi Sophie, > > Correction to my last

Re: [kafka-clients] [VOTE] 2.6.2 RC0

Hi Sophie, Correction to my last e-mail: The bug does not break eos, but it breaks at-least-once. Bruno On 19.03.21 14:54, Bruno Cadonna wrote: Hi Sophie, Please have a look at the following bug report: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/KAFKA-12508 I set its priority to blocker since

Re: [kafka-clients] [VOTE] 2.6.2 RC0

Hi Sophie, Please have a look at the following bug report: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/KAFKA-12508 I set its priority to blocker since the bug might break at-least-once and exactly-once processing guarantees. Feel free to set it back to major, if you think that it is not a

[VOTE] 2.6.2 RC0

Hello Kafka users, developers and client-developers, This is the first candidate for release of Apache Kafka 2.6.2. Apache Kafka 2.6.2 is a bugfix release and fixes 30 issues since the 2.6.1 release. Please see the release notes for more information. Release notes for the 2.6.2 release: