Hi all,
For your information: while developing this, I made a couple of minor
changes to the KIP:
1. `nullableVersions` was added to the `CustomMetadata` schema.
2. `CustomMetadata` was made `null` by default.
3. The same changes as discussed for `RemoteLogSegmentMetadataRecord` were
added for `Re
Hi Ivan,
Thanks and congrats for your first accepted KIP.
Regarding the process, yes you are right. You should create an issue (this
can be done pre-KIP as well), it would be good if you could link this vote
thread in the JIRA. Then you need to update your KIP's wiki page with the
status (approved
Hi all,
Thank you for your votes.
The voting has been open for 7 days and we have:
- 4 binding +1: Divij Vaidya, Luke Chen, Josep Prat, and Satish Duggana
(based on today's state of https://kafka.apache.org/committers).
- 2 non-binding +1: Kamal Chandraprakash and Matthew Benedict de Detrich.
- N
Thanks Ivan for addressing the comments in the KIP, LGTM.
+1
On Tue, 13 Jun 2023 at 18:31, Luke Chen wrote:
>
> Looks good. Thanks for the update.
>
> On Tue, Jun 13, 2023 at 8:08 PM Ivan Yurchenko
> wrote:
>
> > Hi all!
> >
> > Thank you for your votes.
> >
> > Based on the proposal of Satish
Looks good. Thanks for the update.
On Tue, Jun 13, 2023 at 8:08 PM Ivan Yurchenko
wrote:
> Hi all!
>
> Thank you for your votes.
>
> Based on the proposal of Satish in the discussion thread, I modified the
> KIP a little bit by lowering the default value of
> `remote.log.metadata.custom.metadata
Hi all!
Thank you for your votes.
Based on the proposal of Satish in the discussion thread, I modified the
KIP a little bit by lowering the default value of
`remote.log.metadata.custom.metadata.max.size` from 10 KiB to 128 bytes. I
hope this doesn't change your vote, but feel free to raise your c
Hi Ivan,
Thank you very much for this KIP. +1 (binding) from me.
Best,
On Tue, Jun 13, 2023 at 10:03 AM Luke Chen wrote:
> +1 (binding) from me.
>
> Thanks.
> Luke
>
> On Tue, Jun 13, 2023 at 3:44 PM Matthew Benedict de Detrich
> wrote:
> >
> > +1 (non binding). Thanks for KIP
> >
> > On Tue
+1 (binding) from me.
Thanks.
Luke
On Tue, Jun 13, 2023 at 3:44 PM Matthew Benedict de Detrich
wrote:
>
> +1 (non binding). Thanks for KIP
>
> On Tue, Jun 13, 2023 at 3:38 AM Kamal Chandraprakash <
> kamal.chandraprak...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > +1 (non-binding). Thanks for the KIP!
> >
> > On Mo
+1 (non binding). Thanks for KIP
On Tue, Jun 13, 2023 at 3:38 AM Kamal Chandraprakash <
kamal.chandraprak...@gmail.com> wrote:
> +1 (non-binding). Thanks for the KIP!
>
> On Mon, Jun 12, 2023, 21:23 Divij Vaidya wrote:
>
> > I have reviewed the proposal and feel that it would be beneficial to
>
+1 (non-binding). Thanks for the KIP!
On Mon, Jun 12, 2023, 21:23 Divij Vaidya wrote:
> I have reviewed the proposal and feel that it would be beneficial to
> implement.
>
> Vote +1 (non-binding)
>
>
> --
> Divij Vaidya
>
>
>
> On Mon, Jun 12, 2023 at 4:39 PM Ivan Yurchenko
> wrote:
>
> > Hello
I have reviewed the proposal and feel that it would be beneficial to
implement.
Vote +1 (non-binding)
--
Divij Vaidya
On Mon, Jun 12, 2023 at 4:39 PM Ivan Yurchenko
wrote:
> Hello,
>
> Some interest in KIP-917 was expressed in the discussion thread [1]. After
> addressing all the comments t
Hello,
Some interest in KIP-917 was expressed in the discussion thread [1]. After
addressing all the comments there, I'm putting it up to a vote.
Thanks!
Best,
Ivan
[1] https://lists.apache.org/thread/qpccqd3jy5rzvbt5ngtzo3dg9pzp722y
12 matches
Mail list logo
