Since currently logs for
> > multiple partitions are created sequentially not in parallel, it's
> probably
> > okay for us to simply select the directory with most disk spaces in a
> > single round of `nextLogDir` calling. which can be guaranteed to lead to
> > extr
ingle round of `nextLogDir` calling. which can be guaranteed to lead to
> extreme skew. Does it make any senses?
>
>
>
> 发件人: Hu Xi
> 发送时间: 2017年8月3日 16:51
> 收件人: dev@kafka.apache.org
> 主题: 答复: 答复: [DISCUSS] KIP-178: Size-based log direct
: Size-based log directory selection strategy
Hu, I think this is worth discussion even if it doesn't require new config.
Could you also read my second email?
On Wed, Aug 2, 2017 at 6:17 PM, Hu Xi wrote:
> Thanks Dong, do you mean it is more like a naive improvement and no KIP
> is n
Hu, I think this is worth discussion even if it doesn't require new config.
Could you also read my second email?
On Wed, Aug 2, 2017 at 6:17 PM, Hu Xi wrote:
> Thanks Dong, do you mean it is more like a naive improvement and no KIP
> is needed then?
>
>
> 发件人:
Thanks Dong, do you mean it is more like a naive improvement and no KIP is
needed then?
发件人: Dong Lin
发送时间: 2017年8月3日 9:10
收件人: dev@kafka.apache.org
主题: Re: [DISCUSS] KIP-178: Size-based log directory selection strategy
Hey Xu,
Thanks for the KIP. This is a v
