I've updated JIRA versions and the KIP wiki page.
Ismael
On Thu, Mar 2, 2017 at 12:51 AM, Ismael Juma wrote:
> Thanks everyone for the feedback. Since everyone was in favour and we had
> covered this particular case in the time-based release plan[1], I went
> ahead and
+1
Thanks Ismael for volunteering to run the next time based release.
On Wed, Mar 1, 2017 at 4:51 PM, Ismael Juma wrote:
> Thanks everyone for the feedback. Since everyone was in favour and we had
> covered this particular case in the time-based release plan[1], I went
>
Thanks everyone for the feedback. Since everyone was in favour and we had
covered this particular case in the time-based release plan[1], I went
ahead and updated the wiki page to specify the next version as 0.11.0.0.
I'll update JIRA versions and the KIP page soon.
Ismael
[1] "We change the
+1 (non-binding)
On Tue, Feb 28, 2017 at 6:56 PM, Apurva Mehta wrote:
> +1 (non-binding) for 0.11.0
>
> I do agree with Ismael's point that exactly-once should go through one
> release of stabilization before bumping the version to 1.0.
>
> Thanks,
> Apurva
>
> On Mon, Feb
+1 (non-binding) for 0.11.0
I do agree with Ismael's point that exactly-once should go through one
release of stabilization before bumping the version to 1.0.
Thanks,
Apurva
On Mon, Feb 27, 2017 at 7:47 PM, Ismael Juma wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> With 0.10.2.0 out of the way, I
+1
Sounds good to me. Thanks, Ismael.
-Bill
On Tue, Feb 28, 2017 at 1:01 PM, Colin McCabe wrote:
> +1 (non-binding).
>
> Thanks, Ismael.
>
> cheers,
> Colin
>
>
> On Mon, Feb 27, 2017, at 19:47, Ismael Juma wrote:
> > Hi all,
> >
> > With 0.10.2.0 out of the way, I would
+1 (non-binding).
Thanks, Ismael.
cheers,
Colin
On Mon, Feb 27, 2017, at 19:47, Ismael Juma wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> With 0.10.2.0 out of the way, I would like to volunteer to be the release
> manager for our next time-based release. See https://cwiki.apache.org/c
>
Thanks Ismael, +1 for 0.11.0.0
2017-02-28 15:20 GMT+01:00 Ofir Manor :
> Thanks Ismael, makes perfect sense :)
>
> Ofir Manor
>
> Co-Founder & CTO | Equalum
>
> Mobile: +972-54-7801286 | Email: ofir.ma...@equalum.io
>
> On Tue, Feb 28, 2017 at 1:02 PM, Ismael Juma
Thanks Ismael, makes perfect sense :)
Ofir Manor
Co-Founder & CTO | Equalum
Mobile: +972-54-7801286 | Email: ofir.ma...@equalum.io
On Tue, Feb 28, 2017 at 1:02 PM, Ismael Juma wrote:
> Hi Ofir,
>
> Thanks for the feedback. This will be the first release with exactly-once.
Ismael,
Thank you for volunteering to manage the next release.
+1 for 0.11.0.0
Regards,
Rajini
On Tue, Feb 28, 2017 at 11:02 AM, Ismael Juma wrote:
> Hi Ofir,
>
> Thanks for the feedback. This will be the first release with exactly-once.
> I think we should give ourselves
Hi Jeff,
I share your desire to streamline the experience and remove options that
don't make sense to new users. I should, however, point out that we won't
be able to remove the old consumers in 0.11.0.0 as they haven't been
deprecated yet. Hopefully that will happen in 0.12.0.0/1.0.0.
Ismael
Hi Ofir,
Thanks for the feedback. This will be the first release with exactly-once.
I think we should give ourselves at least one stabilisation/polish/feedback
cycle before we go for 1.0. :)
Ismael
On Tue, Feb 28, 2017 at 10:55 AM, Ofir Manor wrote:
> This is definitely
This is definitely a major release, looks already quite exciting...
I don't want to start a bike-shading argument, but a few people have told
me in the past year that once exactly-once delivery lands, Kafka would
likely bump to 1.0. I do like it, but don't feel strongly either way.
Ofir Manor
Hi Vahid,
Sure, I've added KIP-54. I thought I had done it, sorry for the oversight.
Ismael
On Tue, Feb 28, 2017 at 4:31 AM, Vahid S Hashemian <
vahidhashem...@us.ibm.com> wrote:
> +1 on 0.11.0.0.
>
> Can we also include KIP-54 to the list?
> The PR for this KIP is ready for review.
>
>
+1
On Tue, 28 Feb 2017 at 04:32 Vahid S Hashemian
wrote:
> +1 on 0.11.0.0.
>
> Can we also include KIP-54 to the list?
> The PR for this KIP is ready for review.
>
> Thanks.
> --Vahid
>
>
>
>
>
> From: Ismael Juma
> To: dev@kafka.apache.org
>
+1 on 0.11.0.0.
Can we also include KIP-54 to the list?
The PR for this KIP is ready for review.
Thanks.
--Vahid
From: Ismael Juma
To: dev@kafka.apache.org
Date: 02/27/2017 07:47 PM
Subject:[DISCUSS] 0.10.3.0/0.11.0.0 release planning
Sent by:
+1 for 0.11.0.0
Guozhang
On Mon, Feb 27, 2017 at 8:14 PM, Becket Qin wrote:
> Hi Ismael,
>
> Thanks for volunteering on the new release.
>
> I think 0.11.0.0 makes a lot of sense given the new big features we are
> intended to include.
>
> Thanks,
>
> Jiangjie (Becket)
+1 for major version bump.
A good bit of deprecated code I would like to see removed especially on old
consumer side plus a few other settings defaults changed such as the brief
discussion on mirrormaker options a few months back. Just be good to
continue to make the new user experience a lot
Hi Ismael,
Thanks for volunteering on the new release.
I think 0.11.0.0 makes a lot of sense given the new big features we are
intended to include.
Thanks,
Jiangjie (Becket) Qin
On Mon, Feb 27, 2017 at 7:47 PM, Ismael Juma wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> With 0.10.2.0 out of the
19 matches
Mail list logo