Jenkins build is unstable: Kafka » Kafka Branch Builder » trunk #2030

See

[jira] [Resolved] (KAFKA-12283) Flaky Test RebalanceSourceConnectorsIntegrationTest#testMultipleWorkersRejoining

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/KAFKA-12283?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Sagar Rao resolved KAFKA-12283. --- Resolution: Fixed > Flaky Test >

[jira] [Resolved] (KAFKA-8391) Flaky Test RebalanceSourceConnectorsIntegrationTest#testDeleteConnector

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/KAFKA-8391?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Sagar Rao resolved KAFKA-8391. -- Resolution: Fixed Fixed with https://github.com/apache/kafka/pull/12561 > Flaky Test

[DISCUSS] KIP-930: Tiered Storage Metrics

Hi All, I created KIP-930 for adding RemoteIndexCache stats and also to rename some tiered storage metrics added as part of KIP-405 to remove ambiguity.

Re: [VOTE] KIP-944 Support async runtimes in consumer, votes needed!

Hi Erik: I read KIP-944 and email list roughly, it seems most Java developer not familiar with the conception of "coroutine" so cannot imagine why code of one function without Thread.start() may run in separate threads and even developer couldn't control it. Maybe you need a more elaborate

[jira] [Resolved] (KAFKA-14712) Confusing error when writing downgraded FeatureImage

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/KAFKA-14712?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Luke Chen resolved KAFKA-14712. --- Resolution: Fixed > Confusing error when writing downgraded FeatureImage >

Re: [DISCUSS] KIP-954: expand default DSL store configuration to custom types

Guozhang: On your 2nd point: > "impl types" (in hindsight it may not be a good name) for rocksdb / memory / custom, and we used "store types" for kv / windowed / sessioned etc, First off, thanks so much for this clarification -- using "store type" here was definitely making me uncomfortable as

Re: [DISCUSS] KIP-954: expand default DSL store configuration to custom types

Matthias: I'm not sure I agree with (or maybe don't follow) this take: > > we need all kind of `StoreTypeSpec` implementations, > and it might also imply that we need follow up KIPs for new feature > (like in-memory versioned store) that might not need a KIP otherwise. > I see this feature as

Re: [DISCUSS] KIP-954: expand default DSL store configuration to custom types

Thanks everyone for the great discussions so far! I first saw the JIRA and left some quick thoughts without being aware of the already-written KIP (kudos to Almog, very great one) and the DISCUSS thread here. And I happily find some of my initial thoughts align with the KIP already :) Would like

Re: Request permission to contribute

Hello Taras, I saw your ID in the contributors list already, could you check if you can create JIRAs now? Guozhang On Fri, Jul 21, 2023 at 4:00 AM Taras Ledkov wrote: > > Hi, Kafka Team. > > I'm following this wiki to request permission to contribute to Apache Kafka >

Re: [DISCUSS] KIP-954: expand default DSL store configuration to custom types

Thanks for all the input. My intention was not to block the KIP, but just to take a step back and try get a holistic picture and discussion, to explore if there are good/viable alternative designs. As said originally, I really like to close this gap, and was always aware that the current

Re: [DISCUSS] KIP-949: Add flag to enable the usage of topic separator in MM2 DefaultReplicationPolicy

Thanks for both of your feedback and time, I updated the rejected alternative section in the KIP and opened a voting thread here https://lists.apache.org/thread/cy04n445noyp0pqztlp8rk74crvhlrk7 I'll work on the PR in meanwhile so we are ready to go once we get 3 binding votes in order to get into

[VOTE] KIP-949: Add flag to enable the usage of topic separator in MM2 DefaultReplicationPolicy

Hi everyone, I would like to open a vote for KIP-949. The proposal is here https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/KAFKA/KIP-949%3A+Add+flag+to+enable+the+usage+of+topic+separator+in+MM2+DefaultReplicationPolicy .

Re: [VOTE] KIP-944 Support async runtimes in consumer, votes needed!

Hi David, > Could you elaborate a bit more on why the callbacks must be ran in another thread vs in the invoker thread? I have been thinking on how to explain this for 2 months now and it is not easy. It has something to do with that you cannot control what a thread is doing if you have to