I have started the voting thread here:
https://lists.apache.org/thread/pn846910dovg3d0z3k8pmq5opj0tb9w5
Please vote :)
Thanks,
Farooq
On 2023/02/23 07:27:14 "Matthias J. Sax" wrote:
> Thanks for the KIP. Overall LGTM.
>
> I think you can start a VOTE.
>
>
> -Matthias
>
> On 2/22/23 5:56
Thanks for the KIP. Overall LGTM.
I think you can start a VOTE.
-Matthias
On 2/22/23 5:56 PM, Fq Public wrote:
Just wanted to bump this thread for visbility.
Thanks to everyone who has participated in the discussion so far.
Thanks,
Farooq
On 2023/02/14 19:32:53 Guozhang Wang wrote:
Thanks
Just wanted to bump this thread for visbility.
Thanks to everyone who has participated in the discussion so far.
Thanks,
Farooq
On 2023/02/14 19:32:53 Guozhang Wang wrote:
> Thanks Farooq, that looks good to me.
>
> Guozhang
>
> On Sun, Feb 12, 2023 at 9:01 AM Dharin Shah wrote:
> >
> >
Thanks Farooq, that looks good to me.
Guozhang
On Sun, Feb 12, 2023 at 9:01 AM Dharin Shah wrote:
>
> Hello Farooq,
>
> This is actually a great idea, we have dealt with this by using an array
> instead of a set.
> +1 to this :)
>
> Thank you,
> Dharin
>
> On Sun, Feb 12, 2023 at 8:11 PM Fq
Hello Farooq,
This is actually a great idea, we have dealt with this by using an array
instead of a set.
+1 to this :)
Thank you,
Dharin
On Sun, Feb 12, 2023 at 8:11 PM Fq Public wrote:
> Hi Guozhang,
>
> Thanks for reading over my proposal!
>
> > Regarding the format, I'm just thinking if we
Hi Guozhang,
Thanks for reading over my proposal!
> Regarding the format, I'm just thinking if we can change the type of "INT
> newDataLength" to UINT32?
Good idea, I've updated the KIP to reflect UINT32 since it makes clear the
value can never be less than zero.
> `.equals` default
Hello Farooq,
Thanks for the very detailed proposal! I think this is a great idea.
Just a few thoughts:
1. I regret that we over-optimized the Changed serde format for
footprint while making it less extensible. It seems to me that a two
rolling bounce migration is unavoidable.. Regarding the
Hi everyone,
I'd like to share a new KIP for discussion:
https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/x/P5VbDg
This could be considered mostly as a "bug fix" but we wanted to raise a KIP
for discussion because it involves changes to the serialization format of
an internal topic which raises backward