Re: Setting security provider for Karaf 4.3.0-SNAPSHOT

2020-02-02 Thread Jean-Baptiste Onofré
Agree, we should take the same approach. It should not be part of lib and more "startup" bundles (as we have eventadmin and others). I will create a Jira about that. Regards JB On 02/02/2020 17:43, Romain Manni-Bucau wrote: > This is a one way choice so then bouncycastle becomes a jre

Re: Setting security provider for Karaf 4.3.0-SNAPSHOT

2020-02-02 Thread Romain Manni-Bucau
This is a one way choice so then bouncycastle becomes a jre provided lib (as jaxb was) for consumers and bundles are no more working or use other actual instances making it potentially corrupted if bundles and part of the boot - potentially not just karaf jars -must share bc. Also note it would

Re: Setting security provider for Karaf 4.3.0-SNAPSHOT

2020-02-02 Thread Benjamin Graf
Hi together, how going on with this topic. Actually bouncastle is the defacto standard security library for karaf and bundled by default. So taking the approach explained by Robert sounds reasonable to upstream to Karaf itself and moving libs to from system to boot and maybe even register