Re: [PROPOSAL] Apache Karaf runtime releases and roadmap

On 04/06/2024 11.17 am, Jean-Baptiste Onofré wrote: Hi folks, Hey JB, I think it's time to prepare a new milestone for the project :) Short term (and first step) is to prepare the coming release: 1. Apache Karaf 4.4.7 will be submitted to vote next week. It will include: * Improvement o

Re: [VOTE] Apache Karaf OSGi runtime 4.4.6 release

On 09/04/2024 15.33, Jean-Baptiste Onofré wrote: Hi folks, I submit Apache Karaf OSGi runtime 4.4.6 release to your vote. [snip] Please vote to approve this release: [ ] +1 Approve the release [ ] -1 Don't approve the release (please provide specific comments) +1, thanks a ton! Passes ba

Re: [PROPOSAL] Apache Karaf 4.5.x with Java 17+

On 07/04/2024 08.47, Jean-Baptiste Onofré wrote: Hi folks, I'm preparing the Karaf 4.4.6 release using Java 11+. It will provide Spring 6.x features requiring Java 17. As Karaf 4.4.x still uses Camel 3.2.x (Java 11+), it will be up to the user to choose Java 11 (with Camel working) or Java 17+ (

Re: [VOTE] Apache Karaf OSGi runtime 4.4.5 release

+1. Thanks, Robert On 07/01/2024 19.02, Jean-Baptiste Onofré wrote: Hi guys, I submit Apache Karaf OSGi runtime 4.4.5 release to your vote. This release is a maintenance release bringing fixes and dependency updates, especially: - isolate config shell commands in a dedicated bundle to avoid r

RE: [UPDATE] Karaf WebConsole has issues with Karaf 4.4.4

Hey JB,Can you also look at including aries-proxy-1.1.14? It needs the usual ASM bump to not fail when run on Java 21.Thanks,Robert Sent from my Galaxy Original message From: Jean-Baptiste Onofré Date: 10/1/23 07:33 (GMT+01:00) To: dev , user Subject: [UPDATE] Karaf WebCons

Re: jre.properties vs. JEP220?

Regards JB Le dim. 24 sept. 2023 à 21:45, Robert Varga a écrit : Hello everyone, with karaf-4.5.0 requiring Java 11 (https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/KARAF-7754), there are a number of places where we can safely forget about how JVM < 9 did things, which could lead to simplifications. One

Re: Questions about KARAF-5680

/jira/browse/KARAF-7768 to track this. I'll try to circle back to it as I find some free cycles. Thanks, Robert Regards JB Le dim. 24 sept. 2023 à 22:41, Robert Varga a écrit : Hello, now that we are going for Java 11, we need to deal with JPMS and the migration is showing some frict

Re: The meaning of karaf-bom

On 25/09/2023 23.14, Steven Huypens wrote: Hi Robert, Hello Stephen, Seems like a fair point to me, I agree the Karaf BOM should only list Karaf dependencies. It would be nice though to be able to 'use' the library versions Karaf is using for third party dependencies, without having to import

Re: The meaning of karaf-bom

also provide just a library BOM, but I struggle to define the use case where I would really need it :) Thanks, Robert Regards JB Le dim. 24 sept. 2023 à 22:54, Robert Varga a écrit : Hello, One thing that strikes me is "Bill of Materials" as perceived by karaf-bom. As it

The meaning of karaf-bom

Hello, One thing that strikes me is "Bill of Materials" as perceived by karaf-bom. As it currently stands, karaf-bom includes all declarations of karaf.git/pom.xml. As I understand the bill-of-materials concept under Maven, it should only list artifacts provided by a particular project, noth

Questions about KARAF-5680

Hello, now that we are going for Java 11, we need to deal with JPMS and the migration is showing some friction I have not seen in OpenDaylight. OpenDaylight is a Karaf downstream, which requires Java 17 and is in a shape I would expect it to Just Work(tm) sans Karaf. One of such points of f

jre.properties vs. JEP220?

Hello everyone, with karaf-4.5.0 requiring Java 11 (https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/KARAF-7754), there are a number of places where we can safely forget about how JVM < 9 did things, which could lead to simplifications. One of these is Karaf's jre.properties, which (as I understand it)

Re: [VOTE] Apache Karaf OSGi runtime 4.4.4 release

On 12/09/2023 17.06, Jean-Baptiste Onofré wrote: Hi guys, Hey JB, After long weeks of wait, I submit Apache Karaf OSGi runtime 4.4.4 release to your vote. Thanks a lot! This release is a maintenance release bringing fixes and dependency updates. Especially this release includes: - fix rac

Re: karaf-4.5.x?

On 08/01/2023 08:33, Mark Derricutt wrote: On 8 Jan 2023, at 20:14, Jean-Baptiste Onofré wrote: Java 11 is not a point as it's already used on Karaf 4.4.x. Altho it seems we can run Karaf 4.4.x under JDK 8 - so now I'm curious. I assume nothings being targeting JDK 9+ byte code then. Right

Re: pax-web-8: handling security for non-existent resources?

On 17/08/2022 08:31, Grzegorz Grzybek wrote: Hello Hello Grzegorz, sorry for the late reply. I needed some time to get into this entire business. Is this expected behaviour? I would have expected to hit ServiceAuthenticationHttpContext only when servicing /jolokia... /jolokia/* mapping

karaf-4.5.x?

Hello everyone, are there any plans for a karaf-4.5.x release? I think there is a number of breaking changes out there to warrant a rather major step: - Java 11+ - slf4j-2.0.x - logback-1.4.x (Java 11, slf4j-2) - pax-web-9.0.x (Java 11, jetty-10.x) Also, I think it is time to plan for jetty-

Re: [VOTE] Apache Karaf OSGi runtime 4.4.3 release (take #2)

On 07/01/2023 06:43, Jean-Baptiste Onofré wrote: Hi guys, I submit Apache Karaf OSGi runtime 4.4.3 release to your vote (take #2). This release is a maintenance release bringing a lot of dependency updates and fixes. Especially, this release includes: - fix threads leak in karaf-maven-plugin (i

Re: [VOTE] Apache Karaf OSGi runtime 4.3.8 release

On 19/10/2022 14:02, Jean-Baptiste Onofré wrote: Hi guys, I submit Apache Karaf OSGi runtime 4.3.8 release to your vote. This release is a maintenance release bringing a lot of dependency updates and fixes. Especially, this release includes: - new feature:status command - new --repository optio

Re: [VOTE] Apache Karaf OSGi runtime 4.4.2 release

On 19/10/2022 06:04, Jean-Baptiste Onofré wrote: Hi guys, I submit Apache Karaf OSGi runtime 4.4.2 release to your vote. This release is a maintenance release bringing a lot of dependency updates and fixes. Especially, this release includes: - new feature:status command - new --repository optio

Re: osgi.wiring.package; filter:="(osgi.wiring.package=java.io)" for JDK upgrade from 8 to 11

On 07/09/2022 11:10, Siano, Stephan wrote: Hi, Hello, I thing there is a difference in the OSGi specs about importing java.* packages. The OSGI core spec 6.0 says in section 3.4: Bundles do not import the java.* packages and can therefore not specify their dependencies on these variations in

jre-properties past Java 9

Hello JB, everyone, I would like to raise the question of Karaf handles packages exposed from the Java runtime. Since the advent of jlink(1), the enumeration of available packages is very much a subject to change between environments. I have recently raised https://github.com/apache/karaf/p

pax-web-8: handling security for non-existent resources?

Hello, while integrating karaf-4.4.0 into OpenDaylight I ran across a bit of strangeness. We are using Jetty as the implementation and register things through both HTTP Service and also via HTTP Whiteboard, with Shiro in the mix for good measure (via a an indirection, but let's not go into t

Re: [VOTE] Apache Karaf runtime 4.4.1 release

+1, non-binding Regards, Robert On 10/07/2022 19:24, Jean-Baptiste Onofré wrote: Hi guys, I submit Apache Karaf runtime 4.4.1 release to your vote. This release is a maintenance release bringing a lot of dependency updates and fixes. Especially, this release includes: - fix on the exported sy

javax. vs jakarta. ?

Hello, I'd like to ask what is the plan for the javax->jakarta transition in Karaf-land. Specifically, it seems that the transition is mostly complete with 4.4.0, but there are two outliers: - javax.annotation-api-1.3.2 is still exposed from bom, instead of 1.3.5 (which is jakarta) - exa

Re: [VOTE] Apache Karaf runtime 4.3.7 release

On 19/04/2022 15:42, Jean-Baptiste Onofré wrote: Git tag: karaf-4.3.7 Please vote to approve this release: [ ] +1 Approve the release [ ] -1 Don't approve the release (please provide specific comments) +1, non-binding. Thanks, Robert OpenPGP_signature Description: OpenPGP digital signature

Re: [UPDATE] Apache Karaf runtime 4.4.0 during the week end

On 21/03/2022 13:54, Jean-Baptiste Onofré wrote: Hi guys, Hello JB, I found a couple of minor issues that I'm working on right now. I will submit 4.4.0 release to vote asap. sorry to be a bother, but is there an update on this effort? The reason I am asking is we need KARAF-7401 to be able

Re: [DISCUSSION] Move PAX projects to Apache Karaf ?

On 24/02/2022 16:48, Jean-Baptiste Onofré wrote: Hi Achim Just wanted to share concerns I received. Basically, PAX projects are "free fields", without strong guarantee in the release (not formal staging/vote/review). It doesn't mean we don't do that, it's just not strongly enforced;) Hello,

Re: [PROPOSAL] Apache Karaf 4.4.0 release

On 03/02/2022 17:24, Jean-Baptiste Onofré wrote: Hi guys, I would like to release Apache Karaf 4.4.0 (currently main branch). I'm doing a pass on Jira right now. I would like to submit this release to vote probably during the weekend. No objection ? None at all, actually can't wait for R8

Re: [VOTE] Apache Karaf runtime 4.3.4 release (take #3)

On 15/12/2021 05:43, JB Onofré wrote: Please vote to approve this release: [ ] +1 Approve the release [ ] -1 Don't approve the release (please provide specific comments) +1, non-binding. Thanks. Robert OpenPGP_signature Description: OpenPGP digital signature

Re: [VOTE] Apache Karaf runtime 4.3.4 release (take #2)

On 13/12/2021 16:24, Jean-Baptiste Onofré wrote: Please vote to approve this release: [ ] +1 Approve the release OpenDaylight basics seem to be okay with this release, +1 (non-binding). Thanks, Robert OpenPGP_signature Description: OpenPGP digital signature

Re: Preparing Karaf runtime 4.3.4

On 12/11/2021 08:51, Grzegorz Grzybek wrote: Hello Hey, Thanks JBO! I didn't yet add Pax Web 8 to 4.4.0-SNAPSHOT, but I'm going to do it soon. Thanks for all the hard work, I can't wait to give PW8 + R8 a spin! Regards, Robert regards Grzegorz Grzybek pt., 12 lis 2021 o 08:50 Jean-Bap

Re: Preparing Karaf runtime 4.3.4

On 12/11/2021 10:23, Paul Stanley wrote: Thanks JB. Hello Paul, I would have though that OSGI R8 is backwards compatible with R7, as I didn't see any breaking changes in the spec. True, but the artifact packaging with R8 broken up to support JPMS -- i.e. no osgi.cmpn anymore. That is a bre

Re: Preparing Karaf runtime 4.3.4

On 18/10/2021 18:34, JB Onofré wrote: Hi guys Hey JB, Just to let you know that I will submit Felix FileInstall to vote tomorrow (I’m finishing the tests now). So the plan is to submit Karaf 4.3.4 end of this week. thanks for pulling it together! Can I ask you take a look at https://git

Re: Preparing Karaf runtime 4.3.4

On 12/10/2021 14:43, JB Onofré wrote: Hi guys I’m working on Felix FileInstall release fixing the first losing issue. I will include couple of other important fixes. I would like to submit Karaf 4.3.4 to vote during the week end or early next week. Thoughts ? Fixes are always welcome, than

Re: [VOTE] Apache Karaf runtime 4.3.3 release

On 02/09/2021 19:00, Jean-Baptiste Onofre wrote: > Karaf 4.3.3 already ships Jetty 9.4.43: > > https://github.com/apache/karaf/blob/karaf-4.3.3/assemblies/features/standard/src/main/feature/feature.xml#L902 > > And Pax Web does as well (I did the release specifically). Yeah, sorry, it was mess o

Re: [VOTE] Apache Karaf runtime 4.3.3 release

On 02/09/2021 10:33, Jean-Baptiste Onofré wrote: > Hi everyone, Hello JB, everyone, > I submit Apache Karaf runtime 4.3.3 to your vote. > > This release includes bunch of dependency upgrades, fixes, and > improvements, especially: > > - first round of the specs features repository. This reposit

Re: Nice if OSGi and OSGi compendium versions were part of the karaf BoM

On 31/05/2021 16:50, Jean-Baptiste Onofre wrote: > These dependencies are not necessary as they come with cmpn. True, but you need the split out artifacts to make JPMS work reasonably: https://github.com/opendaylight/yangtools/blob/master/xpath/yang-xpath-impl/src/main/java/module-info.java#L26 h

Re: [VOTE] Apache Karaf runtime 4.3.1 release

On 29/03/2021 15:14, Jean-Baptiste Onofre wrote: > Hi everyone, Hello JB, > I submit Apache Karaf runtime 4.3.1 to your vote. > > This release includes bunch of dependency upgrades, fixes, and improvements, > especially: ODL smoke tests look good. Version alignment is on par with 4.2.11, so al

Re: [VOTE] Apache Karaf runtime 4.2.11 release

On 09/03/2021 12:56, Jean-Baptiste Onofre wrote: > Hi everyone, > > I submit Apache Karaf runtime 4.2.11 to your vote. [snip] I ran smoke tests with odlparent-7.0.x. There are two new misalignments between karaf-4.2.11 and pax-web-7.2.23: - javax.interceptor-api/1.2.2 vs 1.2 - org.apache.servic

Re: [PROPOSAL] Disable autoRefresh on features service by default and simple optional features service

On 08/01/2021 09:07, Grzegorz Grzybek wrote: > But summarizing, I'd keep autoRefresh=true in all the scenarios, where > Karaf is used as "application server" and switch it to autoRefresh=false in > µservices / custom distro / single start mode. And looking forward Karaf 5 > and new feature mechanis

Re: Coming releases

On 15/12/2020 14:40, Jean-Baptiste Onofre wrote: > Hi guys, Hey JB, > > As you have probably seen, Apache Karaf Decanter 2.6.0 is in vote. > > Now, I’m focus on Karaf 4.2.11 and 4.3.1 releases. I’m working on Pax Web > releases now and then I will move forward on these releases preparation. a

Re: Thinking about Karaf 5 modulith runtime

On 04/11/2020 20:29, Steinar Bang wrote: >> Jean-Baptiste Onofre : >> My thinking now is more to still use OSGi internally (and let people >> do OSGi on Karaf if they want) but open the scope to other >> framework/approach (spring boot, micro profile, etc). We would embrace >> a wider community

Re: wrap: protocol for static assembly?

On 03/11/2020 14:25, Jean-Baptiste Onofre wrote: > Do you have a chance to be on slack ? I would love to have your help (at > least for the tests) about that (and your use case). No Slack here, but I'll look at setting up -- but it is low prio. Meanwhile I am IRC (but mostly not paying attention)

Re: wrap: protocol for static assembly?

On 03/11/2020 13:42, Jean-Baptiste Onofre wrote: > Hi Robert, Hey JB, > Yes, the problem is about prerequisite and static. > > I described the problem > here: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/KARAF-6573 > > > I will work on a improvement/f

Re: wrap: protocol for static assembly?

On 03/11/2020 07:30, Jean-Baptiste Onofre wrote: > Hi, > > Do you have static-framework feature in your pom dependencies ? With which > scope ? This is pretty much a copy of karaf-docker-example-static-dist, hence I have: https://git.opendaylight.org/gerrit/c/odlparent/+/93414/10/karaf/test-sta

wrap: protocol for static assembly?

Hello, attempting to add 'wrap' or anything that pulls it into a static distribution results in: > [ERROR] Failed to execute goal > org.apache.karaf.tooling:karaf-maven-plugin:4.3.0:assembly > (process-resources) on project test-static: Unable to build assembly: Unable > to resolve root: missi

Re: Static wiring of jakarta.activation-api/1.2.2

On 29/10/2020 14:09, Jean-Baptiste Onofre wrote: > Cool, happy it works. > > And +1 for documentation update. https://github.com/apache/karaf/pull/1245 adds that. Regards, Robert

Re: Static wiring of jakarta.activation-api/1.2.2

latest/#_instances_and_distributions_goals :) Thanks, Robert > > Regards > JB > >> Le 28 oct. 2020 à 13:35, Robert Varga a écrit : >> >> Hello, >> >> I am giving the static distro a try and it works quite well, except one >> problem. >> >> Running karaf-4.3.

Static wiring of jakarta.activation-api/1.2.2

Hello, I am giving the static distro a try and it works quite well, except one problem. Running karaf-4.3.0 RC with Java 11, attempting to include jakarta.activation-api/1.2.2 fails with: > [ERROR] Failed to execute goal > org.apache.karaf.tooling:karaf-maven-plugin:4.3.0:assembly > (process-r

Re: [VOTE] Apache Karaf (runtime) 4.3.0 release

On 27/10/2020 11:27, Grzegorz Grzybek wrote: >> On 26/10/2020 17:22, Jean-Baptiste Onofre wrote: >>> Hi guys, >>> >> What is the story with servlet-api, though? pax-web-features references >> 4.0.1 while karaf defines it at 3.1.0 -- leading to duplicate packaging. >> Seems strange, as Jetty 10 (ser

Re: [VOTE] Apache Karaf (runtime) 4.3.0 release

On 26/10/2020 17:22, Jean-Baptiste Onofre wrote: > Hi guys, > > After several weeks of work, I’m happy to submit Apache Karaf (runtime) 4.3.0 > release to your vote. > > I’m preparing a blog post for some details. Here’s a highlight of some key > points: > > - OSGi R7 > - JDK 11+ > - JSON conf

Re: More often releases/back on regular pace

On 07/10/2020 08:55, Romain Manni-Bucau wrote: > Hi JB, > > Think one key point for this ambition is to be able to ensure releases > don't depend on a single man (whatever his quality is ;)). > Checking on apache index it seems around 3-4 PMC are active (I can be wrong > since I don't follow the l

Re: More often releases/back on regular pace

On 07/10/2020 10:39, Jean-Baptiste Onofre wrote: > Hi, > > Thanks for your kind words ;) > > It’s actually a good idea. And in addition of the release by itself, help on > Jira triage would be very helpful as well ;) > > About more fine grained repo, according we find a good balance (between no

Re: Exceptions seen when using Karaf 4.2.9/Java 11/PaxExam

On 13/08/2020 17:59, Eric Lilja wrote: > Hello, when attempting to move our existing code base from Java 8 to Java > 11, we noticed exceptions appearing in the Karaf log in our automated tests > (using Pax Exam). > > I've made a minimal test project available on github show-casing the issue: > htt

Re: [DISCUSSION] Apache Karaf 4.3.0 and Pax Web

On 07/07/2020 11:18, Jean-Baptiste Onofre wrote: > Hi everyone, > > It’s more than a year now that we started Apache Karaf 4.3.0 release process, > fully supporting OSGi R7. > > If the 4.3.0 distribution is ready, we are blocked by Pax Web. I’m concerned > about that as R8 will be there and we

Re: jclouds use of gson

On 06/07/2020 14:59, Andrew Gaul wrote: > A contributor recently submitted a pull request to jclouds which > proposes unshadowing gson, part of our efforts to modernizing our > dependencies: > > https://github.com/apache/jclouds/pull/78 > > However, our team lacks the OSGi expertise to review thi

Re: [HEADS UP] Three new features proposal this week

On 05/05/2020 23:38, Łukasz Dywicki wrote: > With regard to failure scenario from Grzegorz - I think I've ran into > one. Lately I migrated some features and resolver blew up - it did > because conditional feature was defined in two feature sets causing > stack overflow. I solved it by removal of d

Re: VerifyMojo performance improvement ticket

On 28/04/2020 05:42, Jan Fetyko wrote: > Hi, Hello Jan, > I'd like to create a PR for a VerifyMojo performance enhancement. As per > your guide, I need a JIRA ticket and based on that create a PR. Can > somebody please create a ticket for me or tell me how to create a JIRA > ticket. https://issu

Re: Jdk9plus: materialize it or not

On 27/01/2020 09:26, Grzegorz Grzybek wrote: > Thanks for explanation. I told you - I've never used anything above JDK8... > > And I know this Jigsaw thing brings more trouble than benefits... Anyone of > you using JDK9+ modules at all? Or only making workarounds for them? :) Well, there is a pro

Re: Setting security provider for Karaf 4.3.0-SNAPSHOT

On 15/01/2020 16:25, Benjamin Graf wrote: > Hi, > > I'm actually playing around with the latest 4.3.0-SNAPSHOT. I recognize > that the ssh bundle is using bouncycastle for reading pem files right > now (KARAF-6383). The "issue" I'm facing is that if I like to set > bouncycastle as the security pro

Re: Merry Christmas & releases on the way

On 25/12/2019 10:13, Jean-Baptiste Onofré wrote: > Hi guys, Hey JB, > > on behalf of the Karaf team, I wish a Merry Christmas to the whole Karaf > community. ... thanks, hope it was merry for you as well :) > Let me use this mail to give you an update about releases: > - Karaf 4.2.8 is planned

Re: [HEADS UP] Apache Karaf 4.2.7 on the way

On 16/09/2019 07:50, Jean-Baptiste Onofré wrote: > Hi Robert, > > just to let you know that I updated ASM OpCodes in Aries Proxy and it > works now. > > I will cut the Aries Proxy Impl release today. Awesome, thank you! Sorry about delaying karaf... Regards, Robert

Re: [HEADS UP] Apache Karaf 4.2.7 on the way

On 15/09/2019 07:45, Jean-Baptiste Onofré wrote: > Hi guys, Hey JB, > Now I'm back from ApacheCon NA (it was a nice event by the way), I'm > moving forward on Karaf 4.2.7 release. Does that mean https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ARIES-1923 will be taken care of at some later point in time?

Re: R7 Configurator Spec. 1.0: start level

On 24/08/2019 11:03, Markus Rathgeb wrote: > IIRC SPI Fly does not depend on any other bundle (except the core > framework), so it could make sense to start it earlier (e.g. 20) +1. >> In Karaf 4.3.x, you will have Configurator as part of the config feature. > I don't know which JSON-P implementa

Re: Karaf start up taking a lot of memry

On 14/08/2019 14:29, musician wrote: > The heapdump is accessible at > https://drive.google.com/file/d/17r34T8l8DB8oO2c8RDGDsGwokr9lNKw4/view?usp=sharing The heap dump looks just like what I saw in https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/KARAF-5395 ... Regards, Robert signature.asc Description:

Optional imports resolution between karaf-4.2.2 and karaf-4.2.6?

Hello, we are facing a weird problem in OpenDaylight, trying to upgrade from 4.2.2 to 4.2.6. The problem manifests as Akka's failure to find a class via reflection when a one-shot installation of the entire stack (which is a tree of features) is performed. I was able to narrow it down to what lo

Re: [VOTE] Apache Karaf (runtime) 4.2.6 release

On 07/06/2019 13:13, Jean-Baptiste Onofré wrote: > Hi all, > > I submit Apache Karaf (runtime) 4.2.6 to your vote. This is a > maintenance release on the 4.2.x series, bringing some improvements and > bug fixes (scr with equinox, dependencies updates, and much more !). > > Release Notes: > https:

Re: How to resolve ServiceUnavailableException

On 04/03/2019 11:37, Jean-Baptiste Onofré wrote: > Hi Vikram, Hello JB, > > When using Blueprint, you don't directly relay on the service, but > Blueprint creates a proxy for the reference. > > The "timeout" is what we name the grace period and it happens at startup. > Once the startup is done,

Re: [HEADS UP] Releases schedule

On 20/01/2019 07:23, Grzegorz Grzybek wrote: > Hello > > Some time ago, I prepared this table > > with JavaEE spec mapping (still work in progress wrt implementations). > Hibernate 5.3 == JPA

Re: [HEADS UP] Releases schedule

On 18/01/2019 15:45, Grzegorz Grzybek wrote: > Also check http://people.apache.org/~ggrzybek/bundle-report-full-karaf.xml > report - it's perfectly aligned, not including hibernate features (which we > use directly from upstream hibernate projects) - but nothing that can't be > tweaked using etc/or

Re: SCR Bundle refreshes Pax Logging?

On 17/01/2019 19:46, Grzegorz Grzybek wrote: > I understand. I don't remember (wasn't there when pax-logging was founded), > but it's about those exotic appenders you can use. > But in OSGi, it'd be probably better to rewrite/adjust the > discover/extensibility part in pax-logging-log4j2, to use ou

Re: [HEADS UP] Releases schedule

On 14/01/2019 13:14, Jean-Baptiste Onofré wrote: > Good point. > > Greg or I will tackle this. Hello guys, while you are looking at this, would it make sense to align commons-codec at upgraded 1.11 release? Thanks, Robert signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature

Re: Apache Karaf Pom Missing from Maven Central

On 02/01/2019 18:47, Williams, Kyle [USA] wrote: > Hello! > > I just wanted to give you guys a heads up that it looks like your Apache > Karaf pom is missing from Maven Central for version 4.2.2. Happy New Year! > > http://central.maven.org/maven2/org/apache/karaf/apache-karaf/4.2.2/ Thanks, th

Re: [PROPOSAL] Add spotless to Karaf and subprojects

On 30/11/2018 15:50, Jean-Baptiste Onofré wrote: > Hi Lukasz, > > I tried to use the "standard" style supported by spotless. It's also > possible to use a custom eclipse formatter. FWIW, in ODL we started off with Google formatting (if I remember correctly, it's 5+ years now), but decided to twea

Re: [PROPOSAL] Add spotless to Karaf and subprojects

On 07/11/2018 05:43, Jean-Baptiste Onofré wrote: > Hi team, Hello JB, [...] > On the other hand, I was planning to add findbugs maven plugin as well. findbugs is dead, spotbugs is its replacement. A word of caution: it's null analysis leaves quite a bit to be desired, as it simply does not grok

Re: Karaf target audience and release granularity

On 17/08/18 15:30, Jean-Baptiste Onofré wrote: > Hi Robert, Hello JB, > thanks for your feedback, and I fully agree with you. > > For the release, it's largely my fault for 4.2.1: I wanted to include > too much fixes, upgrades and new features. My bad, and apologize for > that. That's why I want

Re: Karaf target audience and release granularity

Hello Jamie, everyone, On 16/08/18 10:46, Jamie G. wrote: > Karaf is used / consumed heavily in the SDN world (see OpenDaylight & > its ecosystem). > > For that community they do treat Karaf as a SDK for developing their > apps, its also of course their runtime. > > The long support runs we prov

Re: [VOTE] Apache Karaf 3.0.7 release (take 3)

Hello, I do not want to side-track the vote, but would like to inquire about https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/KARAF-4539. We do have a workaround, but given that this is a 3.0.5+ regression I wonder if it could be at least evaulated. Thanks, Robert -- View this message in context: http:/