Re: Any news on the Log4j 2 upgrade?
It sounds good, we can compare our two forks ;) Regards JB On 07/22/2014 07:03 AM, Matt Sicker wrote: I have a fork of pax-logging here: < https://github.com/jvz/org.ops4j.pax.logging> where I started working on porting some parts for log4j2. On 21 July 2014 23:56, Jean-Baptiste Onofré wrote: Hi Matt, I didn't use log4j-slf4j-impl as I did a pax-logging-service native log4j service. However, it could be interesting as a transition to support log4jv2 directly in Karaf without a new version of pax-logging. Let me try it. Thanks for the update Regards JB On 07/21/2014 11:41 PM, Matt Sicker wrote: Log4j2 has slf4j versions of log4j2 markers, so it would work fine to use the SLF4J ones. In fact, if it helps, you can use the log4j-slf4j-impl bundle to bridge log4j-api and log4j-core into slf4j-api. On 21 July 2014 14:28, Jean-Baptiste Onofré wrote: Hi Gareth, I refactored the Markers to use slf4j marker in the case of usage of slf4j pax-logging-service usage, or natively log4j2 native when using log4j pax-logging-service. I will add a couple of unit test about that. Regards JB On 07/21/2014 07:36 PM, Gareth wrote: Hello Jean-Baptiste, I am curious - for the 1.8.0 release are you planning to do anything different with Markers? I understand that Pax Logging currently converts any Markers into an MDC parameter (slf4j.marker) because log4j doesn't support them. However both log4j2 and logback do support Markers natively. Just curious. thanks in advance, Gareth -- View this message in context: http://karaf.922171.n3.nabble. com/Any-news-on-the-Log4j-2-upgrade-tp4034325p4034344.html Sent from the Karaf - Dev mailing list archive at Nabble.com. -- Jean-Baptiste Onofré jbono...@apache.org http://blog.nanthrax.net Talend - http://www.talend.com -- Jean-Baptiste Onofré jbono...@apache.org http://blog.nanthrax.net Talend - http://www.talend.com -- Jean-Baptiste Onofré jbono...@apache.org http://blog.nanthrax.net Talend - http://www.talend.com
Re: Any news on the Log4j 2 upgrade?
I have a fork of pax-logging here: < https://github.com/jvz/org.ops4j.pax.logging> where I started working on porting some parts for log4j2. On 21 July 2014 23:56, Jean-Baptiste Onofré wrote: > Hi Matt, > > I didn't use log4j-slf4j-impl as I did a pax-logging-service native log4j > service. > However, it could be interesting as a transition to support log4jv2 > directly in Karaf without a new version of pax-logging. > Let me try it. > > Thanks for the update > > Regards > JB > > > On 07/21/2014 11:41 PM, Matt Sicker wrote: > >> Log4j2 has slf4j versions of log4j2 markers, so it would work fine to use >> the SLF4J ones. In fact, if it helps, you can use the log4j-slf4j-impl >> bundle to bridge log4j-api and log4j-core into slf4j-api. >> >> >> On 21 July 2014 14:28, Jean-Baptiste Onofré wrote: >> >> Hi Gareth, >>> >>> I refactored the Markers to use slf4j marker in the case of usage of >>> slf4j >>> pax-logging-service usage, or natively log4j2 native when using log4j >>> pax-logging-service. >>> I will add a couple of unit test about that. >>> >>> Regards >>> JB >>> >>> >>> On 07/21/2014 07:36 PM, Gareth wrote: >>> >>> Hello Jean-Baptiste, >>>> >>>> I am curious - for the 1.8.0 release are you planning to do anything >>>> different with Markers? I understand that Pax Logging currently converts >>>> any >>>> Markers into an MDC parameter (slf4j.marker) because log4j doesn't >>>> support >>>> them. However both log4j2 and logback do support Markers natively. Just >>>> curious. >>>> >>>> thanks in advance, >>>> Gareth >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> -- >>>> View this message in context: http://karaf.922171.n3.nabble. >>>> com/Any-news-on-the-Log4j-2-upgrade-tp4034325p4034344.html >>>> Sent from the Karaf - Dev mailing list archive at Nabble.com. >>>> >>>> >>>> -- >>> Jean-Baptiste Onofré >>> jbono...@apache.org >>> http://blog.nanthrax.net >>> Talend - http://www.talend.com >>> >>> >> >> >> > -- > Jean-Baptiste Onofré > jbono...@apache.org > http://blog.nanthrax.net > Talend - http://www.talend.com > -- Matt Sicker
Re: Any news on the Log4j 2 upgrade?
Hi Matt, I didn't use log4j-slf4j-impl as I did a pax-logging-service native log4j service. However, it could be interesting as a transition to support log4jv2 directly in Karaf without a new version of pax-logging. Let me try it. Thanks for the update Regards JB On 07/21/2014 11:41 PM, Matt Sicker wrote: Log4j2 has slf4j versions of log4j2 markers, so it would work fine to use the SLF4J ones. In fact, if it helps, you can use the log4j-slf4j-impl bundle to bridge log4j-api and log4j-core into slf4j-api. On 21 July 2014 14:28, Jean-Baptiste Onofré wrote: Hi Gareth, I refactored the Markers to use slf4j marker in the case of usage of slf4j pax-logging-service usage, or natively log4j2 native when using log4j pax-logging-service. I will add a couple of unit test about that. Regards JB On 07/21/2014 07:36 PM, Gareth wrote: Hello Jean-Baptiste, I am curious - for the 1.8.0 release are you planning to do anything different with Markers? I understand that Pax Logging currently converts any Markers into an MDC parameter (slf4j.marker) because log4j doesn't support them. However both log4j2 and logback do support Markers natively. Just curious. thanks in advance, Gareth -- View this message in context: http://karaf.922171.n3.nabble. com/Any-news-on-the-Log4j-2-upgrade-tp4034325p4034344.html Sent from the Karaf - Dev mailing list archive at Nabble.com. -- Jean-Baptiste Onofré jbono...@apache.org http://blog.nanthrax.net Talend - http://www.talend.com -- Jean-Baptiste Onofré jbono...@apache.org http://blog.nanthrax.net Talend - http://www.talend.com
Re: Any news on the Log4j 2 upgrade?
Log4j2 has slf4j versions of log4j2 markers, so it would work fine to use the SLF4J ones. In fact, if it helps, you can use the log4j-slf4j-impl bundle to bridge log4j-api and log4j-core into slf4j-api. On 21 July 2014 14:28, Jean-Baptiste Onofré wrote: > Hi Gareth, > > I refactored the Markers to use slf4j marker in the case of usage of slf4j > pax-logging-service usage, or natively log4j2 native when using log4j > pax-logging-service. > I will add a couple of unit test about that. > > Regards > JB > > > On 07/21/2014 07:36 PM, Gareth wrote: > >> Hello Jean-Baptiste, >> >> I am curious - for the 1.8.0 release are you planning to do anything >> different with Markers? I understand that Pax Logging currently converts >> any >> Markers into an MDC parameter (slf4j.marker) because log4j doesn't support >> them. However both log4j2 and logback do support Markers natively. Just >> curious. >> >> thanks in advance, >> Gareth >> >> >> >> -- >> View this message in context: http://karaf.922171.n3.nabble. >> com/Any-news-on-the-Log4j-2-upgrade-tp4034325p4034344.html >> Sent from the Karaf - Dev mailing list archive at Nabble.com. >> >> > -- > Jean-Baptiste Onofré > jbono...@apache.org > http://blog.nanthrax.net > Talend - http://www.talend.com > -- Matt Sicker
Re: Any news on the Log4j 2 upgrade?
Hi Gareth, I refactored the Markers to use slf4j marker in the case of usage of slf4j pax-logging-service usage, or natively log4j2 native when using log4j pax-logging-service. I will add a couple of unit test about that. Regards JB On 07/21/2014 07:36 PM, Gareth wrote: Hello Jean-Baptiste, I am curious - for the 1.8.0 release are you planning to do anything different with Markers? I understand that Pax Logging currently converts any Markers into an MDC parameter (slf4j.marker) because log4j doesn't support them. However both log4j2 and logback do support Markers natively. Just curious. thanks in advance, Gareth -- View this message in context: http://karaf.922171.n3.nabble.com/Any-news-on-the-Log4j-2-upgrade-tp4034325p4034344.html Sent from the Karaf - Dev mailing list archive at Nabble.com. -- Jean-Baptiste Onofré jbono...@apache.org http://blog.nanthrax.net Talend - http://www.talend.com
Re: Any news on the Log4j 2 upgrade?
Hello Jean-Baptiste, I am curious - for the 1.8.0 release are you planning to do anything different with Markers? I understand that Pax Logging currently converts any Markers into an MDC parameter (slf4j.marker) because log4j doesn't support them. However both log4j2 and logback do support Markers natively. Just curious. thanks in advance, Gareth -- View this message in context: http://karaf.922171.n3.nabble.com/Any-news-on-the-Log4j-2-upgrade-tp4034325p4034344.html Sent from the Karaf - Dev mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
Re: Any news on the Log4j 2 upgrade?
Sounds good! I may have some pull requests regarding this. On 20 July 2014 23:28, Jean-Baptiste Onofré wrote: > Hi Matt, > > I started to work on Log4j v2 support in Pax Logging. It's plan for Pax > Logging 1.8.0. I released Pax Logging 1.7.3 last week (with bug fixes and > upgrade like support of slf4j 1.7.7). > > I plan to release Pax Logging 1.8.0 with Log4j v2 support beginning of > August. > > Regards > JB > > > On 07/21/2014 01:32 AM, Matt Sicker wrote: > >> Log4j 2.0 was officially released not that long ago, and 2.0.1 will be >> released soon with improved OSGi support. Is there any news on PaxLogging >> or even just Karaf using it? >> >> > -- > Jean-Baptiste Onofré > jbono...@apache.org > http://blog.nanthrax.net > Talend - http://www.talend.com > -- Matt Sicker
Re: Any news on the Log4j 2 upgrade?
Hi Matt, I started to work on Log4j v2 support in Pax Logging. It's plan for Pax Logging 1.8.0. I released Pax Logging 1.7.3 last week (with bug fixes and upgrade like support of slf4j 1.7.7). I plan to release Pax Logging 1.8.0 with Log4j v2 support beginning of August. Regards JB On 07/21/2014 01:32 AM, Matt Sicker wrote: Log4j 2.0 was officially released not that long ago, and 2.0.1 will be released soon with improved OSGi support. Is there any news on PaxLogging or even just Karaf using it? -- Jean-Baptiste Onofré jbono...@apache.org http://blog.nanthrax.net Talend - http://www.talend.com
Any news on the Log4j 2 upgrade?
Log4j 2.0 was officially released not that long ago, and 2.0.1 will be released soon with improved OSGi support. Is there any news on PaxLogging or even just Karaf using it? -- Matt Sicker
