[l10n-dev] [Fwd: Re: TCM QA for l10n builds is planed from Feb 2nd]

2006-01-23 Thread Rafaella Braconi
FYI: in case you have missed Naoyuki's announcement on the dev@qa.openoffice.org list. Rafaella = Hi again, I need to update some info regarding next l10n TCM testing. Here is updated info: Target platform: Linux and Windows (no Solaris builds this time) The binary location:

Re: [l10n-dev] [Fwd: Re: TCM QA for l10n builds is planed from Feb 2nd]

2006-01-23 Thread dwb
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Rafaella, Thanks for forwarding this. Why is en-GB not included amongst the languages? GSIs and all information was submitted in time as requested. I trust this is a simple omission. Thanks David. Rafaella Braconi wrote: FYI: in case you have

[l10n-dev] Problem in officecfg

2006-01-23 Thread Jorge Rivas
After merging my sdf file (galician) , there are many untraslated strings in officecfg , i have checked the sdf file ( i am compiling whith 2.0.1 sources, the same sdf works fine in m140), and i dont see any differences between translated and untraslated strings. The file affected is

Re: [l10n-dev] Problem in officecfg

2006-01-23 Thread Pavel Janík
From: Jorge Rivas [EMAIL PROTECTED] Date: Mon, 23 Jan 2006 21:19:26 +0100 Hi, After merging my sdf file (galician) , there are many untraslated strings in officecfg , i have checked the sdf file ( i am compiling whith 2.0.1 sources, the same sdf works fine in m140), and i dont