Why do released language packs for 3.2 do not contain dictionaries and
dictionary packs have to be installed manually?
I have tested sr, sh and de language packs, neither of them add new
dictionary over English install set on Microsoft Windows XP. Was this
the same for previous releases too?
Is
Hello,
Goran Rakic schrieb:
Why do released language packs for 3.2 do not contain dictionaries and
dictionary packs have to be installed manually?
I have tested sr, sh and de language packs, neither of them add new
dictionary over English install set on Microsoft Windows XP. Was this
the
This might be like beating the dead horse, but I just need to write it down.
The discussion in that issue was funny. There was a statement that langpacks
should not contain dictionaries, which is IMHO not OK.
Langpack is a small package that makes en-US version (or some other language
version)
У нед, 21. 02 2010. у 12:32 +0100, Mechtilde пише:
For the Germanophone there is already issue
http://qa.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=92147
Thanks Mechtilde,
Reading the issue and comments by Ingo Schmidt it looks like this one is
fixed in 3.2.
But I have just downloaded and
Hello,
Goran Rakic schrieb:
У нед, 21. 02 2010. у 12:32 +0100, Mechtilde пише:
For the Germanophone there is already issue
http://qa.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=92147
Reading the issue and comments by Ingo Schmidt it looks like this one is
fixed in 3.2.
this issue is reopened
Florian Effenberger wrote:
John McCreesh wrote on 2010-02-21 16.14:
Hi all,
AFAIK we have now migrated completely to MirrorBrain. However, the
Bouncer
is still recording a significant number of downloads (over 38,000 for
yesterday). I guess these result from people hardcoding download
