Re: Review Request 56858: Review comment fixes for MaxCoveringFactResolver and LeastPartitionResolver

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/56858/#review166126 --- 1. Can you commnet on

[jira] [Updated] (LENS-1391) Review comments for MaxCoveringFactResolver and LeastPartitionResolver On branch lens-1381

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LENS-1391?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Puneet Gupta updated LENS-1391: --- Summary: Review comments for MaxCoveringFactResolver and LeastPartitionResolver On branch lens-1381

[jira] [Commented] (LENS-1387) Move Lens to java 8

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LENS-1387?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15875364#comment-15875364 ] Amareshwari Sriramadasu commented on LENS-1387: --- Have disabled build on

[jira] [Commented] (LENS-1390) Bug fixes after LENS-1386

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LENS-1390?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15875357#comment-15875357 ] Hudson commented on LENS-1390: -- UNSTABLE: Integrated in Jenkins build Lens-Commit-Java8 #306 (See

[jira] [Commented] (LENS-1390) Bug fixes after LENS-1386

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LENS-1390?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15875358#comment-15875358 ] Hudson commented on LENS-1390: -- UNSTABLE: Integrated in Jenkins build Lens-Commit #1386 (See

[jira] [Updated] (LENS-1390) Bug fixes after LENS-1386

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LENS-1390?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Amareshwari Sriramadasu updated LENS-1390: -- Resolution: Fixed Fix Version/s: 2.7 Status: Resolved (was:

[jira] [Updated] (LENS-1390) Bug fixes after LENS-1386

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LENS-1390?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Amareshwari Sriramadasu updated LENS-1390: -- Affects Version/s: 2.7 > Bug fixes after LENS-1386 > - >

[jira] [Commented] (LENS-1390) Bug fixes after LENS-1386

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LENS-1390?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15874886#comment-15874886 ] Hadoop QA commented on LENS-1390: - Applied patch:

Review Request 56858: Review comment fixes for MaxCoveringFactResolver and LeastPartitionResolver

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/56858/ --- Review request for lens. Bugs: LENS-1391

[jira] [Created] (LENS-1391) Review comments for MaxCoveringFactResolver and LeastPartitionResolver On brach lens-1381

Lavkesh Lahngir created LENS-1391: - Summary: Review comments for MaxCoveringFactResolver and LeastPartitionResolver On brach lens-1381 Key: LENS-1391 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LENS-1391

[jira] [Updated] (LENS-1390) Bug fixes after LENS-1386

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LENS-1390?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Lavkesh Lahngir updated LENS-1390: -- Status: Patch Available (was: Open) > Bug fixes after LENS-1386 > - > >

[jira] [Updated] (LENS-1390) Bug fixes after LENS-1386

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LENS-1390?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Lavkesh Lahngir updated LENS-1390: -- Attachment: LENS-1390.patch > Bug fixes after LENS-1386 > - > >

[jira] [Created] (LENS-1390) Bug fixes after LENS-1386

Lavkesh Lahngir created LENS-1390: - Summary: Bug fixes after LENS-1386 Key: LENS-1390 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LENS-1390 Project: Apache Lens Issue Type: Bug

Re: Review Request 56842: LENS-1389: Valid Update periods for a storage candidate should not be bigger than query time range

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/56842/#review166068 ---

[jira] [Commented] (LENS-1386) Add support for separate tables for update periods in one storage

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LENS-1386?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15874340#comment-15874340 ] Hudson commented on LENS-1386: -- UNSTABLE: Integrated in Jenkins build Lens-Commit-Java8 #305 (See

[jira] [Commented] (LENS-1386) Add support for separate tables for update periods in one storage

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LENS-1386?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15874337#comment-15874337 ] Hudson commented on LENS-1386: -- UNSTABLE: Integrated in Jenkins build Lens-Commit #1385 (See

[jira] [Commented] (LENS-1386) Add support for separate tables for update periods in one storage

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LENS-1386?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15874264#comment-15874264 ] Hadoop QA commented on LENS-1386: - Patch does not apply. Build job:

[jira] [Updated] (LENS-1386) Add support for separate tables for update periods in one storage

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LENS-1386?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Amareshwari Sriramadasu updated LENS-1386: -- Resolution: Fixed Fix Version/s: 2.7 Status: Resolved (was:

[jira] [Updated] (LENS-1386) Add support for separate tables for update periods in one storage

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LENS-1386?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Amareshwari Sriramadasu updated LENS-1386: -- Component/s: server cube api > Add support for

[jira] [Work started] (LENS-1389) Valid Update periods for a storage candidate should not be bigger than query time range

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LENS-1389?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Work on LENS-1389 started by Rajat Khandelwal. -- > Valid Update periods for a storage candidate should not be bigger than

[jira] [Commented] (LENS-1389) Valid Update periods for a storage candidate should not be bigger than query time range

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LENS-1389?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15874243#comment-15874243 ] Rajat Khandelwal commented on LENS-1389: Created https://reviews.apache.org/r/56842/ > Valid

[jira] [Created] (LENS-1389) Valid Update periods for a storage candidate should not be bigger than query time range

Rajat Khandelwal created LENS-1389: -- Summary: Valid Update periods for a storage candidate should not be bigger than query time range Key: LENS-1389 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LENS-1389

[jira] [Commented] (LENS-1386) Add support for separate tables for update periods in one storage

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LENS-1386?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15874226#comment-15874226 ] Hadoop QA commented on LENS-1386: - Applied patch:

Re: Review Request 55712: Fact Schema change to support all update periods in one storage

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/55712/#review166063 --- Ship it! Ship It! - Amareshwari Sriramadasu On Feb. 19,

[jira] [Updated] (LENS-1386) Add support for separate tables for update periods in one storage

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LENS-1386?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Lavkesh Lahngir updated LENS-1386: -- Status: Patch Available (was: Open) > Add support for separate tables for update periods in one

[jira] [Updated] (LENS-1386) Add support for separate tables for update periods in one storage

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LENS-1386?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Lavkesh Lahngir updated LENS-1386: -- Attachment: LENS-1386.patch > Add support for separate tables for update periods in one storage