e have only tested with Intel Niantic (82599 ixgbe 10G) NICs until now,
> but there is nothing that prevents other NICs from working too.
>
>
>
> Raja
>
>
>
> *From: *Dev <dev-boun...@lists.opencontrail.org> on behalf of Joo Kim <
> itsolut...@gmail.com>
> *Date: *F
Hello,
Regarding vrouter dpdk support for host and vm (data packet)communication,
looks like vrouter code uses vHost mechanism
(
http://images.slideplayer.com/11/3319449/slides/slide_11.jpg
)
Then, any plan on supporting IVSHMEM mechanism also?
-Thanks-
Hello,
Looks like, in the case of ARP, DHCP,.. , packet is copied and sent from
vrouter to agent. Maybe, that kind of traffic's performance does not matter
much.
Then, for regular traffic, on 1st packet processing, as I
understand, vrouter copies the packet header only and sends it over pkt0
to
o support ivshmem at the moment.
>
>
>
> Raja
>
>
>
> *From: *Dev <dev-boun...@lists.opencontrail.org> on behalf of Joo Kim <
> itsolut...@gmail.com>
> *Date: *Sunday, October 2, 2016 at 2:59 AM
> *To: *"dev@lists.opencontrail.org" <dev@lists.ope
n-overlay packets (for example, ping/ssh to the compute node) are
> sent to the host network stack.
>
>
>
> Raja
>
>
>
> *From: *Joo Kim <itsolut...@gmail.com>
> *Date: *Monday, October 10, 2016 at 11:52 AM
>
> *To: *Raja Sivaramakrishnan <r...@
Hello,
Our host OS is Centos7-based.
And l happened to see this thread:
http://lists.opencontrail.org/pipermail/dev_lists.opencontrail.org/2015-January/001844.html
My query:
Does Vrouter change anything in the packet path code/module of receiving
packets via SoftIrq(NAPI poll) +
I mean, is the path of vr_interface_common_hook() receiving packets via
SoftIrq(NAPI poll) OK from performance perspective? I remember
ksoftirqd is easily reaching high 90 percent when pumping up high rate
traffic into Linux stack
On Tue, Aug 15, 2017 at 9:46 PM, Joo Kim <itsolut...@gmail.
