Re: [opencontrail-dev] service instance health-check bug

2016-09-19 Thread





I use vyatta as firewallservice and version of service chain is v1.




On 09/19/2016 14:18,

Ganesha H V
<ganesh...@juniper.net>
wrote:








What is the image and version of Service Chain you are using? 






Thanks & Regards,
Ganesha HV.
"To be conscious that you're ignorant, is a great step to success" - Dr.Kalam




From: Dev <dev-boun...@lists.opencontrail.org> on behalf of 钱行 <qi...@certusnet.com.cn>
Sent: Monday, September 19, 2016 11:45:00 AM
To: dev
Subject: [opencontrail-dev] service instance health-check bug
 



hi,all


    I started a service-instance with 2 max-instances in active-active ha_mode. I call them vmA and vmB
    As usual, each of these instances has three interfaces, which are manage, left and right interface,with flow from left to right,
and I bonded health-check instance with left interfaces and right interfaces.
    If I shutdown the left interface in the vmA, the flows all go to vmB of course.
    BUT, if I shut down the right interface in the vmA, some flow still go to vmA, and the service-instance doesn't work well.
    So, we lose half of the flows when one of the right interfaces goes down.


    How can I solve it? Or, we should have a data struct like "risk group", which contains left and right interface peers, and once
one of the interface health-checked failed, all the interface in the group will be set inactive.




    Any help will be appreciated!
---
Hang Qian







___
Dev mailing list
Dev@lists.opencontrail.org
http://lists.opencontrail.org/mailman/listinfo/dev_lists.opencontrail.org


[opencontrail-dev] service instance health-check bug

2016-09-19 Thread





hi,all    I started a service-instance with 2 max-instances in active-active ha_mode. I call them vmA and vmB    As usual, each of these instances has three interfaces, which are manage, left and right interface,with flow from left to right,and I bonded health-check instance with left interfaces and right interfaces.    If I shutdown the left interface in the vmA, the flows all go to vmB of course.    BUT, if I shut down the right interface in the vmA, some flow still go to vmA, and the service-instance doesn't work well.    So, we lose half of the flows when one of the right interfaces goes down.    How can I solve it? Or, we should have a data struct like "risk group", which contains left and right interface peers, and onceone of the interface health-checked failed, all the interface in the group will be set inactive.    Any help will be appreciated!---Hang Qian





___
Dev mailing list
Dev@lists.opencontrail.org
http://lists.opencontrail.org/mailman/listinfo/dev_lists.opencontrail.org