I have an issue open here https://github.com/openshift/origin/issues/14092
about pods sometimes getting deployed without internal network connectivity
(using multinenant plugin). They still seem to have outbound network
connectivity.
I believe these may be the relevant logs, I was wondering if
It would be better, I think so. More letters to type, but doesn't
require answering questions about where the binary is.
> On May 16, 2017, at 5:28 PM, Dusty Mabe wrote:
>
>
>
>> On 05/16/2017 03:24 PM, Clayton Coleman wrote:
>> We want everyone to use `oc adm`. All `oadm`
Two bugs were addressed in this release, please see the GitHub release page
for more info:
https://github.com/openshift/origin/releases/tag/v1.5.1
___
dev mailing list
dev@lists.openshift.redhat.com
On 05/16/2017 03:24 PM, Clayton Coleman wrote:
> We want everyone to use `oc adm`. All `oadm` is is a symlink to it.
Good to know. So can we say that when we create future docs we should stick
to using `oc adm`?
___
dev mailing list
We want everyone to use `oc adm`. All `oadm` is is a symlink to it.
On Tue, May 16, 2017 at 3:08 PM, Dusty Mabe wrote:
>
> Hey Everyone,
>
> There is an issue I opened against minishift [1] to request that `oadm`
> be placed on the user's machine as well as `oc`. In this
Hey Everyone,
There is an issue I opened against minishift [1] to request that `oadm`
be placed on the user's machine as well as `oc`. In this discussion in
that issue the question of `oadm` vs `oc adm` came up. Can we get some
advice on the future perspective of these two.
Will openshift docs
Hi
It has been some weeks now since release 1.5.0, and there are some important
bugfixes in the codebase following release 1.5.0.
So question is when, if at all, will there be a release 1.5.1 of OpenShift
Origin?
Best regards
Lars Milland