Re: usage of `oadm` vs `oc adm` in docs

It would be better, I think so. More letters to type, but doesn't require answering questions about where the binary is. > On May 16, 2017, at 5:28 PM, Dusty Mabe wrote: > > > >> On 05/16/2017 03:24 PM, Clayton Coleman wrote: >> We want everyone to use `oc adm`. All `oadm`

Re: usage of `oadm` vs `oc adm` in docs

On 05/16/2017 03:24 PM, Clayton Coleman wrote: > We want everyone to use `oc adm`. All `oadm` is is a symlink to it. Good to know. So can we say that when we create future docs we should stick to using `oc adm`? ___ dev mailing list

Re: usage of `oadm` vs `oc adm` in docs

We want everyone to use `oc adm`. All `oadm` is is a symlink to it. On Tue, May 16, 2017 at 3:08 PM, Dusty Mabe wrote: > > Hey Everyone, > > There is an issue I opened against minishift [1] to request that `oadm` > be placed on the user's machine as well as `oc`. In this

usage of `oadm` vs `oc adm` in docs

Hey Everyone, There is an issue I opened against minishift [1] to request that `oadm` be placed on the user's machine as well as `oc`. In this discussion in that issue the question of `oadm` vs `oc adm` came up. Can we get some advice on the future perspective of these two. Will openshift docs