Re: [Dev] Networking

> 1 - Can't connect via wifi  on at least 2 of my computers.  Fails on > bootup -with message "direct firmware load for rtl9192ce > /*(DEBLOBBED)/ failed with error -2"  or words to that effect. True of [...] > 2 - Still trying to get a workiing install of either LXDE or MATE > openrc alpa 

Re: [Dev] Is Iridium safe to use?

2017-11-15T13:12:23-0800 jc_gargma wrote: > When you post the results of QtWebEngine, please cc > qtwebeng...@qt-project.org > so that they are not left out of the loop this time. > Qt is a friend to the free software community. Please give them the chance to > fix the issues. > > > -jc Could

Re: [Dev] Is Iridium safe to use?

See the update in the related thread. I'm seeding the text file. 2017-11-15T20:08:35+ Josh Branning wrote: > Thank you for this. > > Could I also request you upload the text file(s) somewhere? I can't > seem to download them from the lists.gnu.org archive, and that may be > a problem for

Re: [Dev] Is Iridium safe to use?

icenses. > > May also be worth creating a pad, and seeing if people are willing to > help if it's a long list? > > Josh > > On 15/11/17 20:00, Adonay Felipe Nogueira wrote: >> See the response I gave ([1]) to the new thread in the directory-discuss >> mailing li

Re: [Dev] Is Iridium safe to use?

See the response I gave ([1]) to the new thread in the directory-discuss mailing list ([2]). Apparently it didn't change much, also considering the ambiguities I noted on [1].. I'll try doing the same steps for Iridium and QtWebEngine. [1]

Re: [Dev] Is Iridium safe to use?

I also have contributed to that thread on directory-discuss mailing list. I hope it helps somehow. ;) bill-auger writes: > there is an open issue about this on the parabola bug tracker that you > can watch if you like > > https://labs.parabola.nu/issues/1167 > > i

Re: [Dev] zeropar at #parabola: Suggestion to package mist and bisq

Thanks! ;) I have made package requests for mist () and bisq (). bill-auger writes: > > there is a dedicated board on the bug tracker for package requests > >

[Dev] zeropar at #parabola: Suggestion to package mist and bisq

Yesterday zeropar, a user in the #parabola IRC channel suggested to package mist and bisq. I don't know if this is the right place to make such suggestion or if someone else is already working on this, and I also *don't* know if they are free/libre (we'll have to investigate that). Please note

Re: [Dev] update your-freedom not to reject firefox

It's been a while since I last revisited this issue with Mozilla and its stuff. The trademark issue hasn't changed ([1][2]). Also there is the problem of third-party repositories not commited to providing only free/libre functional data ([3]). Mozilla's "trust" on Debian doesn't change much.

Re: [Dev] Non-free JS at parabola.nu

I'd like to work on this issue a little bit, but my investigations led me to another one: [[https://labs.parabola.nu/issues/1405]]. -- - [[https://libreplanet.org/wiki/User:Adfeno]] - Palestrante e consultor sobre /software/ livre (não confundir com gratis). - "WhatsApp"? Ele não é livre, por

Re: [Dev] Parabola as an option for Purism Librem laptops

Thank you very much for the interest. :) I don't speak for the Parabola project (because I'm in so many projects that I hardly have time to focus on a single one), but I think that the Parabola project could support the idea as long as the result complies with the GNU FSDG --- not to be confused

Re: [Dev] Stallman's talks in Brazil and Argentina

For the one in Belo Horizonte, Brazil, there'll be a recording. Unfortunatelly I don't know about the others so far. ___ Dev mailing list Dev@lists.parabola.nu https://lists.parabola.nu/mailman/listinfo/dev

[Dev] Stallman's talks in Brazil and Argentina

Richard Stallman needs no introduction... but here is one anyway! Richard Stallman is the author of the GNU GPL, founded the Free Software Foundation, and started the development of the GNU operating system (including GNU Emacs, GCC, the coreutils, etc.), which we and tens of millions of GNU/Linux

Re: [Dev] Fwd: Re: Article: Chromium's subtle freedom flaws

I'm in favor of supporting Iridium instead of Chromium. While people may argue that there are not enough proof that Chromium has freedom issues, I think it would be more risky if we were to overlook the issue. -- - [[https://libreplanet.org/wiki/User:Adfeno]] - Palestrante e consultor sobre

Re: [Dev] Policy for Package Quarantines

So far, I'm against "releasing" packages from the quarantine if they are kept there until "some time", because this "release" would probably favor "problematic" software rather than favor "innocent" software. However, I'm in favor of making the reference fields for the quarantine mandatory, and

Re: [Dev] Some doubts about Parabola's donations

I'm reading the messages about this issue, and I have some suggestions: I don't know if this serves as valid fiscal sponsors, but perhaps we can contact Associação Software Livre (ASL, from Brasil) --- not to be confused with FSFLA ---, and Cooperativa de Trabalho em Tecnologias Livres (Colivre,

Re: [Dev] Parabola Game Project - EOMA68

Hi Jorginho, thank you very much for your interest! As an eventual contributor (although not very active), I must say that this is indeed an interesting project to work with. However, as you might have guessed, by looking at the past news comming from the Parabola project, one must note that the

Re: [Dev] [News] GNU and Bola comic book titled "IoT" is available in British English language!

You're welcome! :) signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part ___ Dev mailing list Dev@lists.parabola.nu https://lists.parabola.nu/mailman/listinfo/dev

Re: [Dev] [News] GNU and Bola comic book titled "IoT" is available in British English language!

Sorry for resurrecting this discussion, but the translation of the article is ready, and is attached in this email. Respectfully, Adonay. -- # pt-BR: Brasileiro | en: Brazilian * pt-BR: Palestra sobre liberdade de software (movimento filosófico político-social, não tecnológico). * en: Gives

Re: [Dev] [News] GNU and Bola comic book titled "IoT" is available in British English language!

The article is attached in this email. Is it OK for you to read Brazilian Portuguese? Or do you want me to translate it? Remember: The article is "non-official", in the sense that it was never reviewed and published by a journal. For those wanting to know the license of the article: I decided

Re: [Dev] [News] GNU and Bola comic book titled "IoT" is available in British English language!

I recently made a short review of an article about IoT for a college work. In the review I basically criticized the fact that most materials about IoT don't mention issues related to the absence of software freedom, and how it's important to society in general (not just technical people). It's not

Re: [Dev] [libreplanet-discuss] Misleading information in EOMA68 news

My first attempt was to discuss and suggest better wordings for both older and upcoming publications. I didn't intend to make accusations and such. This is why I sent several messages here suggesting both "parties" of the discussion to simply analise the issue and, if needed, correct not only the

Re: [Dev] [libreplanet-discuss] Misleading information in EOMA68 news

This issue of "you said it is 'libre' but I prove it's not", and even the issue regarding the older publication on ThinkPenguin's site, can be easily solved by changing terms/words accordingly there. There's no need to make everyone mad at each other. For example, we can publish updates on these

Re: [Dev] Misleading information in EOMA68 news

Just now, I **have** subscribed to Parabola's dev mailing list. So I'll try to catch-up with this topic. :) I'm inserting libreplanet-discuss and trisquel-users mailing lists as recipients of this email because of my opinion on Tiberiu-Cezar Tehnoetic's message