Re: [Dev] Is Iridium safe to use?

2017-11-15 Thread jc_gargma
> I'll try doing the same steps for Iridium and QtWebEngine. When you post the results of QtWebEngine, please cc qtwebeng...@qt-project.org so that they are not left out of the loop this time. Qt is a friend to the free software community. Please give them the chance to fix the issues. -jc

Re: [Dev] Is Iridium safe to use?

2017-11-15 Thread Josh Branning
On 15/11/17 16:42, Adonay Felipe Nogueira wrote: I also have contributed to that thread on directory-discuss mailing list. I hope it helps somehow. ;) bill-auger writes: there is an open issue about this on the parabola bug tracker that you can watch if you like

Re: [Dev] Is Iridium safe to use?

2017-11-15 Thread Adonay Felipe Nogueira
See the response I gave ([1]) to the new thread in the directory-discuss mailing list ([2]). Apparently it didn't change much, also considering the ambiguities I noted on [1].. I'll try doing the same steps for Iridium and QtWebEngine. [1]

Re: [Dev] Is Iridium safe to use?

2017-11-15 Thread Josh Branning
Thank you for this. Could I also request you upload the text file(s) somewhere? I can't seem to download them from the lists.gnu.org archive, and that may be a problem for people who wish to help try and clarify the licenses. May also be worth creating a pad, and seeing if people are willing

Re: [Dev] Is Iridium safe to use?

2017-11-15 Thread Adonay Felipe Nogueira
I'd prefer a wiki or a temporary repository. Pads are OK but hard to keep track of changes without a browser with enough resources and speed to run the JS and live updates. I'll see where I can put the list. I just notice that the FSD is having some downtime, perhaps they're doing maintainance.

Re: [Dev] Is Iridium safe to use?

2017-11-15 Thread Josh Branning
Yes, on a wiki would be good/fine. :) Unsure about any maintenance ... Thanks again, Josh On 15/11/17 20:39, Adonay Felipe Nogueira wrote: I'd prefer a wiki or a temporary repository. Pads are OK but hard to keep track of changes without a browser with enough resources and speed to run the

[Dev] Orphan Nonprism package [webkitgtk] marked out-of-date

2017-11-15 Thread Parabola Website Notification
rob...@tutanota.com wants to notify you that the following packages may be out-of-date: The user provided the following additional text: I'm getting a message from my-privacy with the following message: :: Starting full system upgrade... warning: webkit2gtk: local (2.18.3-1) is newer than

Re: [Dev] Orphan Libre package [kipi-plugins] marked out-of-date

2017-11-15 Thread jc_gargma
> The user provided the following additional text: I've attached a git format-patch to update kipi-plugins to 5.7.0 -jc From abd04c41df53d372a89dd5f178f83fac532808a0 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: jc_gargma Date: Wed, 15 Nov 2017 15:51:09 -0800 Subject: [PATCH]

Re: [Dev] Is Iridium safe to use?

2017-11-15 Thread Adonay Felipe Nogueira
I also have contributed to that thread on directory-discuss mailing list. I hope it helps somehow. ;) bill-auger writes: > there is an open issue about this on the parabola bug tracker that you > can watch if you like > > https://labs.parabola.nu/issues/1167 > > i