On Fri, 29 May 2020 23:31:29 -0400 Megver83 wrote:
> P.S: I'm cloning chromium from git, to explore its source.
> It's heavy as hell!!! (16GB)
ok let us know when you have finished reading 16GB of source
code - it should be the year of the linux desktop by then
fossology is the tool for that job
El 29-05-20 a las 23:03, bill-auger escribió:
> On Fri, 29 May 2020 22:06:46 -0400 Megver83 wrote:
>> I've encountered myself webpages that refuse
>> to work with anything that isn't Chrome
>
> i would not consider that to be our problem - that is a problem
> for those websites to address - if
On Fri, 29 May 2020 22:06:46 -0400 Megver83 wrote:
> I've encountered myself webpages that refuse
> to work with anything that isn't Chrome
i would not consider that to be our problem - that is a problem
for those websites to address - if they do not want firefox
users to use their website, then
El 29-05-20 a las 21:58, Denis 'GNUtoo' Carikli escribió:
> As I see it, there are several approaches possible:
> - Replace Chromium by Gecko somehow. This will need to be done for
> every API that uses chromium, like qt5-webengine, electron and so on.
> The advantage is that we don't have the
> I've started a page about it here:
> https://libreplanet.org/wiki/Group:Software/research/Chromium
david hedlund and adfeno created on the FSD two years ago, with
the same intention - it has changed URLs several times; but i
found it
https://directory.fsf.org/wiki/Review:Chromium-REV-ID-1
On Fri, 29 May 2020 20:03:47 -0400
Megver83 wrote:
> The purpose with this is to create a distro-agnostic project to solve
> the Chromium problem, so then each FSDG distro will implement the
> solutions in their specific ways. I think that ppl from Parabola,
> PureOS and the FSF/GNU project will
regarding iridium/ungoogled, this has all been discussed before
on the FSDG and FSD mailing lists - from what i remember,
ungoogled is not a browser, but a set of patches - iridium is a
browser which is made using the ungoogled patches - as we build
everything from source, the two projects are
On Fri, 29 May 2020 21:59:27 -0300
Freemor wrote:
> I'd be really good to get input from the other distros on this RFC
> before any actual zooming ahead as they may have their own ideas that
> need to be synthesised with this one.
I've not looked at it personally, but we have this issue as well
I think it sounds like an execllent (if ambitious) plan. And it is at least
that. "A plan" which is infinitely better at this point then "Wait for the
FSF".
I'd be really good to get input from the other distros on this RFC before any
actual zooming ahead as they may have their own ideas that
I think that one of the greatest problems with this is that users and
devs of FSDG distros are not joining forces, or better say: we are not
doing a coordinated effort to address this topic, but I think we all
know that. Coordinating efforts is in fact easier that how it sounds.
Someone (me? when
10 matches
Mail list logo
