JDK 18: Rampdown Phase 1 & Early-Access builds 27

2021-12-09 Thread David Delabassee
Ralph, Thank you for being part of the OpenJDK Quality Outreach Program. As year-end 2021 approaches, I'd like to share some updates on JDK 18, which is scheduled for General Availability on March 22, 2022. JDK 18 has now entered Rampdown Phase One (RDP1) [1], which means that the main-line

[RESULT][VOTE] Release Log4j 2.15.0-rc2

2021-12-09 Thread Ralph Goers
I am closing this release vote early since all the PMC members who generally voted on releases have done so. This vote passes with +1 votes from Carter Kozak, Matt Sicker, Volkan Yazici, Ron Grabowski, Gary Gregory, Remko Popma, and Ralph Goers. There were no other votes. I will continue with

Re: [VOTE] Release Log4j 2.15.0-rc2

2021-12-09 Thread Ralph Goers
My +1 Ralph > On Dec 9, 2021, at 4:00 PM, Remko Popma wrote: > > +1 > > build succeeds and all tests pass on my windows machine. > > > Apache Maven 3.6.2 (40f52333136460af0dc0d7232c0dc0bcf0d9e117; > 2019-08-28T00:06:16+09:00) > Maven home: C:\apps\apache-maven-3.6.2\bin\.. > Java version:

Re: [VOTE] Release Log4j 2.15.0-rc2

2021-12-09 Thread Remko Popma
+1 build succeeds and all tests pass on my windows machine. Apache Maven 3.6.2 (40f52333136460af0dc0d7232c0dc0bcf0d9e117; 2019-08-28T00:06:16+09:00) Maven home: C:\apps\apache-maven-3.6.2\bin\.. Java version: 1.8.0_202, vendor: Oracle Corporation, runtime: C:\apps\jdk1.8.0_202\jre Default

Re: [VOTE] Release Log4j 2.15.0-rc2

2021-12-09 Thread Gary Gregory
+1 RAT check OK RevApi check OK on log4j-api but gives weird errors on log4j-1.2-api OK: mvn clean install Apache Maven 3.8.4 (9b656c72d54e5bacbed989b64718c159fe39b537) Maven home: /usr/local/Cellar/maven/3.8.4/libexec Java version: 1.8.0_292, vendor: AdoptOpenJDK, runtime:

Re: SetUtils

2021-12-09 Thread Remko Popma
+1 On Fri, Dec 10, 2021 at 1:31 AM Gary Gregory wrote: > Sounds good. > > Gary > > On Thu, Dec 9, 2021, 11:02 Volkan Yazıcı wrote: > > > SetUtils is only used by log4j-web, yet it is in log4j-core. I want to > mark > > it as deprecated in release-2.x and remove it in master. Objections? > > >

Re: [VOTE] Release Log4j 2.15.0-rc2

2021-12-09 Thread Ron Grabowski
Same results for rc2 vs rc1: Cassandra test not deleting a .toDelete file. Everything else was fine: +1 Building - mvn clean install - mvn apache-rat:check - mvn revapi:check -pl log4j-api Apache Maven 3.8.4 (9b656c72d54e5bacbed989b64718c159fe39b537)Maven home:

Re: [VOTE] Release Log4j 2.15.0-rc2

2021-12-09 Thread Volkan Yazıcı
+1 Great work, Ralph! Thanks so much! On Thu, Dec 9, 2021 at 7:43 PM Ralph Goers wrote: > This is a vote to release Log4j 2.15.0, the next version of the Log4j 2 > project. > > Please download, test, and cast your votes on the log4j developers list. > [] +1, release the artifacts > [] -1,

Re: [VOTE] Release Log4j 2.15.0-rc2

2021-12-09 Thread Matt Sicker
+1 Build good, sigs good, etc. Still has an issue running the Cassandra integration test on my machine, but not a blocker. Environment info: Apache Maven 3.8.4 (9b656c72d54e5bacbed989b64718c159fe39b537) Maven home: /opt/homebrew/Cellar/maven/3.8.4/libexec Java version: 1.8.0_312, vendor: Azul

Re: [VOTE] Release Log4j 2.15.0-rc2

2021-12-09 Thread Carter Kozak
+1 rat passes build+tests pass [logging-log4j2-2.x]$ mvn -v Apache Maven 3.6.3 Maven home: /usr/share/maven Java version: 1.8.0_282, vendor: Azul Systems, Inc., runtime: /home/ckozak/.tools/jdk/zulu8.52.0.23-ca-jdk8.0.282-linux_x64/jre Default locale: en_US, platform encoding: UTF-8 OS name:

[VOTE] Release Log4j 2.15.0-rc2

2021-12-09 Thread Ralph Goers
This is a vote to release Log4j 2.15.0, the next version of the Log4j 2 project. Please download, test, and cast your votes on the log4j developers list. [] +1, release the artifacts [] -1, don't release because... The vote will remain open for 72 hours (or more if required). All votes are

Re: [VOTE] Release Log4j 2.15.0-rc1

2021-12-09 Thread Ralph Goers
Due to a problem found in testing this release vote is cancelled. > On Dec 8, 2021, at 1:42 AM, Volkan Yazıcı wrote: > > +1 > > `verify` keeps failing due to SimplePerfTest failures – I will rely on CI > and others for this. > I have tested a custom JTL template, the killer feature of this JTL

Re: SetUtils

2021-12-09 Thread Gary Gregory
Sounds good. Gary On Thu, Dec 9, 2021, 11:02 Volkan Yazıcı wrote: > SetUtils is only used by log4j-web, yet it is in log4j-core. I want to mark > it as deprecated in release-2.x and remove it in master. Objections? >

Re: SetUtils

2021-12-09 Thread Ralph Goers
I’m fine with that. Ralph > On Dec 9, 2021, at 9:02 AM, Volkan Yazıcı wrote: > > SetUtils is only used by log4j-web, yet it is in log4j-core. I want to mark > it as deprecated in release-2.x and remove it in master. Objections?

SetUtils

2021-12-09 Thread Volkan Yazıcı
SetUtils is only used by log4j-web, yet it is in log4j-core. I want to mark it as deprecated in release-2.x and remove it in master. Objections?

Re: changes.xml

2021-12-09 Thread Gary Gregory
Sure, I can do that next time. Gary On Thu, Dec 9, 2021, 00:17 Remko Popma wrote: > Why not have separate entries for each change instead of this one > big thingy: > > > - org.eclipse.persistence:javax.persistence . 2.1.1 -> > 2.2.1 > -