Ralph,
Thank you for being part of the OpenJDK Quality Outreach Program. As
year-end 2021 approaches, I'd like to share some updates on JDK 18,
which is scheduled for General Availability on March 22, 2022.
JDK 18 has now entered Rampdown Phase One (RDP1) [1], which means that
the main-line
I am closing this release vote early since all the PMC members who generally
voted on releases have done so.
This vote passes with +1 votes from Carter Kozak, Matt Sicker, Volkan Yazici,
Ron Grabowski, Gary Gregory, Remko Popma, and Ralph Goers. There were no other
votes.
I will continue with
My +1
Ralph
> On Dec 9, 2021, at 4:00 PM, Remko Popma wrote:
>
> +1
>
> build succeeds and all tests pass on my windows machine.
>
>
> Apache Maven 3.6.2 (40f52333136460af0dc0d7232c0dc0bcf0d9e117;
> 2019-08-28T00:06:16+09:00)
> Maven home: C:\apps\apache-maven-3.6.2\bin\..
> Java version:
+1
build succeeds and all tests pass on my windows machine.
Apache Maven 3.6.2 (40f52333136460af0dc0d7232c0dc0bcf0d9e117;
2019-08-28T00:06:16+09:00)
Maven home: C:\apps\apache-maven-3.6.2\bin\..
Java version: 1.8.0_202, vendor: Oracle Corporation, runtime:
C:\apps\jdk1.8.0_202\jre
Default
+1
RAT check OK
RevApi check OK on log4j-api but gives weird errors on log4j-1.2-api
OK: mvn clean install
Apache Maven 3.8.4 (9b656c72d54e5bacbed989b64718c159fe39b537)
Maven home: /usr/local/Cellar/maven/3.8.4/libexec
Java version: 1.8.0_292, vendor: AdoptOpenJDK, runtime:
+1
On Fri, Dec 10, 2021 at 1:31 AM Gary Gregory wrote:
> Sounds good.
>
> Gary
>
> On Thu, Dec 9, 2021, 11:02 Volkan Yazıcı wrote:
>
> > SetUtils is only used by log4j-web, yet it is in log4j-core. I want to
> mark
> > it as deprecated in release-2.x and remove it in master. Objections?
> >
>
Same results for rc2 vs rc1: Cassandra test not deleting a .toDelete file.
Everything else was fine:
+1
Building
- mvn clean install
- mvn apache-rat:check
- mvn revapi:check -pl log4j-api
Apache Maven 3.8.4 (9b656c72d54e5bacbed989b64718c159fe39b537)Maven home:
+1
Great work, Ralph! Thanks so much!
On Thu, Dec 9, 2021 at 7:43 PM Ralph Goers
wrote:
> This is a vote to release Log4j 2.15.0, the next version of the Log4j 2
> project.
>
> Please download, test, and cast your votes on the log4j developers list.
> [] +1, release the artifacts
> [] -1,
+1
Build good, sigs good, etc. Still has an issue running the Cassandra
integration test on my machine, but not a blocker.
Environment info:
Apache Maven 3.8.4 (9b656c72d54e5bacbed989b64718c159fe39b537)
Maven home: /opt/homebrew/Cellar/maven/3.8.4/libexec
Java version: 1.8.0_312, vendor: Azul
+1
rat passes
build+tests pass
[logging-log4j2-2.x]$ mvn -v
Apache Maven 3.6.3
Maven home: /usr/share/maven
Java version: 1.8.0_282, vendor: Azul Systems, Inc., runtime:
/home/ckozak/.tools/jdk/zulu8.52.0.23-ca-jdk8.0.282-linux_x64/jre
Default locale: en_US, platform encoding: UTF-8
OS name:
This is a vote to release Log4j 2.15.0, the next version of the Log4j 2 project.
Please download, test, and cast your votes on the log4j developers list.
[] +1, release the artifacts
[] -1, don't release because...
The vote will remain open for 72 hours (or more if required). All votes are
Due to a problem found in testing this release vote is cancelled.
> On Dec 8, 2021, at 1:42 AM, Volkan Yazıcı wrote:
>
> +1
>
> `verify` keeps failing due to SimplePerfTest failures – I will rely on CI
> and others for this.
> I have tested a custom JTL template, the killer feature of this JTL
Sounds good.
Gary
On Thu, Dec 9, 2021, 11:02 Volkan Yazıcı wrote:
> SetUtils is only used by log4j-web, yet it is in log4j-core. I want to mark
> it as deprecated in release-2.x and remove it in master. Objections?
>
I’m fine with that.
Ralph
> On Dec 9, 2021, at 9:02 AM, Volkan Yazıcı wrote:
>
> SetUtils is only used by log4j-web, yet it is in log4j-core. I want to mark
> it as deprecated in release-2.x and remove it in master. Objections?
SetUtils is only used by log4j-web, yet it is in log4j-core. I want to mark
it as deprecated in release-2.x and remove it in master. Objections?
Sure, I can do that next time.
Gary
On Thu, Dec 9, 2021, 00:17 Remko Popma wrote:
> Why not have separate entries for each change instead of this one
> big thingy:
>
>
> - org.eclipse.persistence:javax.persistence . 2.1.1 ->
> 2.2.1
> -
16 matches
Mail list logo