Thank you for RM'ing Christian!
Gary
On Mon, Oct 16, 2023, 4:28 PM Christian Grobmeier
wrote:
> Apache Log4j team is pleased to announce the 2.21.0
> release. Apache Log4j is a versatile, industrial-strength
> Java logging framework composed of an API, its implementation,
> and components to
Below...
On Mon, Oct 16, 2023 at 7:38 AM Piotr P. Karwasz
wrote:
>
> Hi all,
>
> While checking out the module descriptors of `3.x` I have some
> propositions of improvements to `log4j-jdbc` that I would like to run
> by you before creating the appropriate Github issues:
>
> 1. The `log4j-jdbc`
Apache Log4j team is pleased to announce the 2.21.0
release. Apache Log4j is a versatile, industrial-strength
Java logging framework composed of an API, its implementation,
and components to assist the deployment for various use cases.
For further information (support, download, etc.) see the
Hi Matt,
On Mon, 16 Oct 2023 at 19:10, Matt Sicker wrote:
>
> I’ve seen that test fail in CI before as well. I wonder if there’s any
> firewall issues that can interfere with it, or if it relies on some
> potentially unusable state like a common port number.
I switched to ephemeral ports
Here is my own +1
With that, this vote passes with 5x +1 from:
Volkan Yazici
Piotr Karawasz
Gary Gregory
Ralph Goers
Christian Grobmeier
I will proceed with the following steps soon
Thanks to everybody who voted!
Christian
On Fri, Oct 13, 2023, at 11:08, Christian Grobmeier wrote:
> This is
I’ve seen that test fail in CI before as well. I wonder if there’s any firewall
issues that can interfere with it, or if it relies on some potentially unusable
state like a common port number.
> On Oct 16, 2023, at 8:06 AM, Ralph Goers wrote:
>
> I enabled that profile. Log4j-core-test failed
> On Oct 16, 2023, at 6:38 AM, Piotr P. Karwasz wrote:
>
> 2. There are two ways to map event data to columns: ColumnConfig and
> ColumnMapping. It is unclear to me which way is the recommended one.
> Since we can perform breaking changes in 3.x, could we remove one of
> these methods?
I added
I enabled that profile. Log4j-core-test failed after just over 23 minutes.
[INFO]
[INFO] Results:
[INFO]
[ERROR] Failures:
[ERROR]
Great questions and I will address each one, hopefully later today.
Gary
On Mon, Oct 16, 2023, 7:38 AM Piotr P. Karwasz
wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> While checking out the module descriptors of `3.x` I have some
> propositions of improvements to `log4j-jdbc` that I would like to run
> by you before
Hi all,
While checking out the module descriptors of `3.x` I have some
propositions of improvements to `log4j-jdbc` that I would like to run
by you before creating the appropriate Github issues:
1. The `log4j-jdbc` module depends on the optional presence of
`log4j-jndi`. Maybe we should split
10 matches
Mail list logo
