Re: [log4j-kotlin] Next release (`1.3.1`-vs-`1.4.0`)

2023-12-18 Thread Raman Gupta
Thanks Volkan -- Matt, I believe release 1.4.0 is ready for a vote. * ASF staging site: https://logging.staged.apache.org/log4j/kotlin/latest/#release-notes-1-4-0 (from branch https://github.com/apache/logging-log4j-kotlin/commits/asf-staging/) * Signed distribution and checksums: https://dist.a

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Log4j 3.0.0-beta1

2023-12-18 Thread Matt Sicker
+1 > On Dec 18, 2023, at 2:45 PM, Matt Sicker wrote: > > We can review this without doing a reproducibility check. The signatures of > everything look good; just doing some final validations before voting. > >> On Dec 18, 2023, at 6:38 AM, Gary Gregory wrote: >> >> Since Piotr asked for a fi

Re: [log4j] Revamping Log4j website & manual

2023-12-18 Thread Gary Gregory
When I read "pages", "site", and do on, I am reminded of the model-view paradigm. I would offer that we focus on _content_ first, and write that content in some general format that tooling can then be used to generate a site, a PDF, Javadoc, whatever. FWIW, when I worked on the "Java Persistence w

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Log4j 3.0.0-beta1

2023-12-18 Thread Matt Sicker
We can review this without doing a reproducibility check. The signatures of everything look good; just doing some final validations before voting. > On Dec 18, 2023, at 6:38 AM, Gary Gregory wrote: > > Since Piotr asked for a fix and Matt can reproduce the issue, I'm not going > to take the tim

Re: [log4j] Revamping Log4j website & manual

2023-12-18 Thread Matt Sicker
I’d be interesting in helping with this, particularly around plugin development docs which are somewhat anemic. I’ve got several things to document in a non-API-doc fashion from the new DI system and such, too. > On Dec 18, 2023, at 1:13 PM, Volkan Yazıcı wrote: > > *TLDR:* Log4j websites & ma

Re: All-in-one site documentation

2023-12-18 Thread Volkan Yazıcı
Thanks for the heads up Gary. I was (and still am!) a big fan of utilizing Javadoc for the manual. This is pretty relevant for the website revamp email I just shared. I will explore the Juneau approach in detail and share my findings in the tooling-related thread I intend to send sometime this week

[log4j] Revamping Log4j website & manual

2023-12-18 Thread Volkan Yazıcı
*TLDR:* Log4j websites & manual will be rewritten. Feedback and support are more than welcome. Starting from February, Christian, Piotr, and I will be working on reorganizing the Log4j websites (Log4j, Log4j Scala, Log4j Tools, etc.) and rewriting the Log4j manual. Many implementation details are

Re: All-in-one site documentation

2023-12-18 Thread Matt Sicker
This is pretty cool! > On Dec 18, 2023, at 11:37 AM, Gary D. Gregory wrote: > > Hi All, > > A while back, I mentioned that we could (not should) have our documentation > generated within Javadoc. Here is an example from another Apache project I > participate in: > > https://juneau.apache.or

Re: All-in-one site documentation

2023-12-18 Thread Gary D. Gregory
FYI https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/JUNEAU/Adding+content+to+the+overview-summary.html+file On 2023/12/18 17:37:36 "Gary D. Gregory" wrote: > Hi All, > > A while back, I mentioned that we could (not should) have our documentation > generated within Javadoc. Here is an example from a

All-in-one site documentation

2023-12-18 Thread Gary D. Gregory
Hi All, A while back, I mentioned that we could (not should) have our documentation generated within Javadoc. Here is an example from another Apache project I participate in: https://juneau.apache.org/site/apidocs-9.0.1/index.html I'm late to Juneau and I don't know the ins and out of how it'

20 years of Log4j: Happy anniversary folks!

2023-12-18 Thread Christian Grobmeier
Happy anniversary, folks! Yesterday, on 17.12.2003, the ASF accepted our project, and Log4j was born. Twenty years later, this community is not only vibrant but growing. I have met many great people in this project and continue to learn from our user base, committers, and PMC members. Therefo

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Log4j 3.0.0-beta1

2023-12-18 Thread Gary Gregory
Since Piotr asked for a fix and Matt can reproduce the issue, I'm not going to take the time.to review this RC. Gary On Mon, Dec 18, 2023, 3:21 AM Volkan Yazıcı wrote: > Even though the vote was intended for 72 hours, it has been 5 days and > there hasn't been any official votes on the release.

[VOTE][LAZY] Release Apache Logging Parent 10.5.0 (RC3)

2023-12-18 Thread Volkan Yazıcı
This is a lazy-vote to release the Apache Logging Parent 10.5.0 (RC3). Website: https://logging.staged.apache.org/logging-parent GitHub: https://github.com/apache/logging-parent Commit: e4816c8c364c594359914cad808cf8fa582f1c0d Distribution: https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/logging/logging-pa

[ANNOUNCE] Apache Log4j Tools 0.7.0 released

2023-12-18 Thread Volkan Yazıcı
Apache Log4j Tools team is pleased to announce the 0.7.0 release. This project provides tooling internally used by the Apache Log4j project. For further information (support, download, etc.) see the project website[1]. [1] https://logging.apache.org/log4j/tools === Release Notes This minor relea

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Log4j 3.0.0-beta1

2023-12-18 Thread Volkan Yazıcı
Even though the vote was intended for 72 hours, it has been 5 days and there hasn't been any official votes on the release. I will wait for another 24 hours and cancel the release. I will appreciate PMC members' participation in the voting. On Wed, Dec 13, 2023 at 4:26 PM Volkan Yazıcı wrote: >

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Log4j Tools 0.7.0

2023-12-18 Thread Volkan Yazıcı
Adding my +1. With that, the release passes with 3 binding +1 votes from Piotr, Gary, and me. I will continue the release process. On Thu, Dec 14, 2023 at 1:40 PM Volkan Yazıcı wrote: > This is a vote to release the Apache Log4j Tools 0.7.0. > > Website: https://logging.staged.apache.org/log4j/