I saw the same errors with JDK8 on Windows:
openjdk version "1.8.0_342"
OpenJDK Runtime Environment Corretto-8.342.07.3 (build 1.8.0_342-b07)
OpenJDK 64-Bit Server VM Corretto-8.342.07.3 (build 25.342-b07, mixed mode)
[ERROR] Errors:
[ERROR]
Dear Log4j community,
While working on the December 2021 Apache Log4j 2 releases the Apache
Logging Services PMC received requests to reevaluate the 2015
End-of-Life (EOL) decision for Apache Log4j 1, which has seen its
latest release in 2012.
We have considered these requests and discussed
+1 for Option 1
On 12/29/2021 2:33 PM, Christian Grobmeier wrote:
Hello,
as discussed in another thread, this is a vote about the future of log4j 1.
This vote stays open for the usual 72h.
Options are explained below.
You can vote for:
[ ] +1, Option 1
[ ] +1, Option 2
[ ] +/- 0,
+0 no concerns, I'm just not at a machine where I can verify
On Wednesday, December 29, 2021, 01:40:50 PM EST, Matt Sicker
wrote:
I’m waiting to see if Ron or any other PMC members wanted to review this
before I close the vote and continue with the release.
--
Matt Sicker
> On Dec
+1
"mvn clean install -pl '!log4j-cassandra'" ran correctly. Verified
hashes and asc files. RAT passed too.
On 12/28/2021 7:46 PM, Gary Gregory wrote:
+1
SHA512 OK
ASC OK
RAT check OK
mvn clean install -pl '!log4j-cassandra' OK
openjdk version "1.8.0_312"
OpenJDK Runtime Environment (build
+1 for passing tests and website. RAT failed on these two files: !?
docs/2.17.0-interpolation.md !? docs/cve-map.md
On Monday, December 27, 2021, 07:31:20 PM EST, Matt Sicker
wrote:
This is a vote to release Log4j 2.17.1, the next version of the Log4j 2
project.
Please
I interpreted your comment as the branch name on the 2.17.0 site says
'log4j-2.17.0' which doesn't exist, it should be 'rel/2.17.0'. I updated
pom.xml in release-2.x to use the rel/x.y.z pattern in future deploys. When the
2.17.0 site is redeployed source-repository.html will be updated with
+1
On Thursday, December 23, 2021, 04:45:14 PM EST, Matt Sicker
wrote:
+1
--
Matt Sicker
> On Dec 23, 2021, at 15:41, Dominik Psenner wrote:
>
> +1
>
> --
> Sent from my phone. Typos are a kind gift to anyone who happens to find
> them.
>
> On Thu, Dec 23, 2021, 22:38 Ralph Goers
+1
I wrote a simple HelloWorld app with 2.3.1 running on jdk1.6.0_45 to
further verfiy LOG4J2-3198. These commands ran successfully too:
mvn clean install
mvn site -DskipTests
mvn apache-rat:check -DskipTests
Apache Maven 3.8.4 (9b656c72d54e5bacbed989b64718c159fe39b537)
Maven home:
Vladimir, wouldn't a more efficient approach be to offer support to
Logging Services then have them make a release to address the recent CVE
while still maintaining 1.2.17 compatibility? I don't get the sense
folks are against fixing things. Re-starting the entire EOL'ed Log4j1
engine with a
+1
mvn clean install
mvn apache-rat:check
Apache Maven 3.8.4 (9b656c72d54e5bacbed989b64718c159fe39b537)
Maven home: C:\projects\apache-maven-3.8.4
Java version: 1.8.0_181, vendor: Oracle Corporation, runtime: C:\Program
Files\Java\jdk1.8.0_181\jre
Default locale: en_US, platform encoding:
Severity: moderate (CVSS: 3.7 AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:L)
Description:
It was found that the fix to address CVE-2021-44228 in Apache Log4j 2.15.0 was
incomplete in certain non-default configurations. This could allows attackers
with control over Thread Context Map (MDC) input data
I saw the vote has already been closed on log4j-2.16.0-rc1, +1 from me
for completeness. No cassandra errors with rat:check this time:
mvn clean install -t toolchains-sample-win.xml
mvn revapi:check -pl log4j-api
mvn apache-rat:check
Apache Maven 3.8.4
+1 for Log4j 2.15.1-rc1, I accidently replied to the wrong thread earlier.
mvn clean install -t toolchains-sample-win.xmlmvn apache-rat:checkmvn
revapi:check -pl log4j-api
Apache Maven 3.8.4 (9b656c72d54e5bacbed989b64718c159fe39b537)Maven home:
C:\projects\apache-maven-3.8.4Java version:
+1
mvn clean install -t toolchains-sample-win.xml
mvn apache-rat:checkmvn revapi:check -pl log4j-api
Apache Maven 3.8.4 (9b656c72d54e5bacbed989b64718c159fe39b537)Maven home:
C:\projects\apache-maven-3.8.4Java version: 1.8.0_181, vendor: Oracle
Corporation, runtime: C:\Program
Same results for rc2 vs rc1: Cassandra test not deleting a .toDelete file.
Everything else was fine:
+1
Building
- mvn clean install
- mvn apache-rat:check
- mvn revapi:check -pl log4j-api
Apache Maven 3.8.4 (9b656c72d54e5bacbed989b64718c159fe39b537)Maven home:
I built with Java 8 because that's the default JDK on this Windows 10 box.
Based on https://logging.apache.org/log4j/2.x/build.html I understand why Java
9 is needed. Why are Java 7 and Java 11 JDKs required to build? It took a few
minutes to find a JDK 7 installer. I had to add a new
at constructing a `MapMessage` and passing it to
`Logger#log()` is not very convenient. That I agree with. But then let's
improve the `Logger` API instead.
On Tue, Sep 21, 2021 at 3:24 AM Ron Grabowski
wrote:
> Any thoughts if the concept of a message template would add value to JSON
> Template
Ughh, second badly formatting email. Need to research that some more
On Monday, September 20, 2021, 09:24:45 PM EDT, Ron Grabowski
wrote:
Any thoughts if the concept of a message template would add value to JSON
Template Layout? Heavily inspired by Serilog:
https://ikeptwalking.com
Any thoughts if the concept of a message template would add value to JSON
Template Layout? Heavily inspired by Serilog:
Follow-up to "Formatting the date is expensive. The process of actually
formatting a value is reasonable". Is this still an issue from LOG4J2-930:
%m %ex%n: 1,755,573 msg/sec%d %m %ex%n: 1,194,184 msg/sec
If so, isn't date rendering essentially a sequence we can generate ahead of
time similar
Yes, this is the intent of LOG4J2-2986:
"stackTrace": {
"stringified": true, "truncatedStringSuffix": ">",
"truncationPointStrings": ["at javax.servlet.http.HttpServlet.service"]}
That snippet from the PR doesn't seem to match your documentation grammar
"truncationPointStrings" vs
Why can't you use the default, ExclusiveLock? log4net automatically manages
writing messages from different threads in the same process. InterProcessLock
is for a specific use case where more than one process is trying to write to
the same file. In that case writing to multiple files and
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LOG4NET-342?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13679984#comment-13679984
]
Ron Grabowski commented on LOG4NET-342:
---
The IsEnabled's come in handy when you
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LOG4NET-373?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13621533#comment-13621533
]
Ron Grabowski commented on LOG4NET-373:
---
That sounds odd. How many characters
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LOG4NET-345?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13397229#comment-13397229
]
Ron Grabowski commented on LOG4NET-345:
---
Did you try Google or stackoverflow.com
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LOG4NET-344?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13288947#comment-13288947
]
Ron Grabowski commented on LOG4NET-344:
---
When I posted a link
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LOG4NET-344?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13287014#comment-13287014
]
Ron Grabowski commented on LOG4NET-344:
---
I recommend using this:
https
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LOG4NET-342?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13285164#comment-13285164
]
Ron Grabowski commented on LOG4NET-342:
---
Not too difficult to stop your app from
Maybe OpenFile isn't the best place to look for error. If you want access to a
logging event so you can send it somewhere else if writing to the appender
fails you'll probably need to check that the previous write was successful
higher up in the chain in one of the DoAppend methods. I'll keep
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LOG4NET-148?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Ron Grabowski reassigned LOG4NET-148:
-
Assignee: Ron Grabowski
ThreadContext uses LocalDataStore to store ThreadSpecific
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LOG4NET-332?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Ron Grabowski closed LOG4NET-332.
-
Resolution: Won't Fix
This isn't a bug in log4net. You need to write your own appender
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LOG4NET-332?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Ron Grabowski closed LOG4NET-332.
-
Resolution: Duplicate
See LOG4NET-1
I'm looking for the ability to set up
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LOG4NET-331?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13251223#comment-13251223
]
Ron Grabowski commented on LOG4NET-331:
---
At first glance it looks like it pattern
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LOG4NET-266?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13251229#comment-13251229
]
Ron Grabowski commented on LOG4NET-266:
---
Catching ObjectDisposedException
The converter is trying to protect itself...the base class checks to make sure
HttpContext.Current is not null then a check against Request is made:
// AspNetRequestPatternConverter
protected override void Convert(TextWriter writer, LoggingEvent loggingEvent,
HttpContext httpContext)
{
if
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LOG4NET-327?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13238068#comment-13238068
]
Ron Grabowski commented on LOG4NET-327:
---
Why do you think that? The break means
Does anyone know who owns the log4net nuget package?
http://nuget.org/packages/log4net
http://blog.cincura.net/232619-log4net-back-alive-on-nuget/
We're the 6th most populate package on nuget! Can someone explain what it would
take to get the nuget package files into our svn repository?
Anyone know why there are extended chars in most of the log4net ndoc files? For
example this page has empty-blocks in IE9 and triangle-question-marks in
Firefox:
http://logging.apache.org/log4net/release/sdk/log4net.Appender.BufferingAppenderSkeleton.Evaluator.html
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LOG4NET-87?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13177748#comment-13177748
]
Ron Grabowski commented on LOG4NET-87:
--
Have you tried fixing the fields before
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LOG4NET-320?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13177548#comment-13177548
]
Ron Grabowski commented on LOG4NET-320:
---
It looks like your patch only works
+1
From: Stefan Bodewig bode...@apache.org
To: log4net-dev@logging.apache.org; log4net-u...@logging.apache.org
Sent: Tuesday, September 20, 2011 12:41 PM
Subject: Dropping Support for .NET CF 1.0 and SSCLI 1.0 in log4net 1.2.11
Hi all,
sorry for the cross-post
Project: Log4net
Issue Type: Wish
Components: Core
Affects Versions: 1.2.10
Reporter: Ron Grabowski
Assignee: Ron Grabowski
Priority: Minor
Fix For: 1.2.11
It would be nice if there were built-in Pattern Converters to support
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LOG4NET-235?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13104037#comment-13104037
]
Ron Grabowski commented on LOG4NET-235:
---
I don't think having one aspnet pattern
The signature changes from void to ICollection shouldn't break anything. Now
the configurators return a list of configuration messages. I suppose it should
return an array of a certain type instead of just ICollection. Maybe something
like ConfigurationMessage[] or LogLog[]. I lean more
I don't have any hard numbers but the last time I played around with
MinimalLock it was very very slow. I view InterProcessLock as an intermediary
between exclusive and minimal locking.
From: Dominik Psenner dpsen...@gmail.com
To: 'Log4NET Dev'
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LOG4NET-164?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13104050#comment-13104050
]
Ron Grabowski commented on LOG4NET-164:
---
I like the name InterProcessLock
using
Can you share a config snippet showing how to use the RemotingAppender like
you've described?
What happens when one of the apps goes down? I envision the InterProcessLock as
a locking model used between two low/medium chatty apps that want to write to
the same file that may or may not be
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LOG4NET-235?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13103300#comment-13103300
]
Ron Grabowski commented on LOG4NET-235:
---
I checked the 5 AspNet classes just now
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LOG4NET-151?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13101362#comment-13101362
]
Ron Grabowski commented on LOG4NET-151:
---
A further optimization might be to allow
New key? I think I Nicko sent me the current assembly keya long time ago.
People always complain when keys change
From: Stefan Bodewig bode...@apache.org
To: log4net-dev@logging.apache.org
Sent: Thursday, September 8, 2011 12:26 AM
Subject: Distribution Formats
Is your .NET 4 support just in the NAnt scripts? It's probably safe to replace
the VS2008 solution file with a VS2010 version.
From: Stefan Bodewig bode...@apache.org
To: log4net-dev@logging.apache.org
Sent: Saturday, August 20, 2011 6:14 AM
Subject: State of
I still use log4net every day across several large projects and check the
mailing lists several times a week. All my stuff is still on 3.5 still so I
haven't been hit by any of the 4.0 issues. I don't know how much a new release
targeting just 1.1, 2.0, and 3.5 would benefit people right
Ummm, what does TabbedOutput look like?
From: mc_line mc_line_...@yahoo.com.mx
To: log4net-dev@logging.apache.org
Sent: Monday, May 30, 2011 1:18 PM
Subject: System.FormatException: Index (zero based) must be greater than or
equal to zero
Hi I keep getting
https://github.com/lorenzomelato/rhino-commons/blob/master/Rhino.Commons/Logging/AsyncBulkInsertAppender.cs
- Original Message -
From: anjansingh mailan...@hotmail.com
To: log4net-dev@logging.apache.org
Cc:
Sent: Monday, April 11, 2011 5:09 AM
Subject: RE: Log4net Asynchronous Logging
10 programs writing to the same file? That's a lot. RollingFileAppender isn't
process-safe.
From: kinnar (JIRA) j...@apache.org
To: log4net-dev@logging.apache.org
Sent: Friday, February 18, 2011 9:45 AM
Subject: [jira] Created: (LOG4NET-285) Issue with rolling
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LOG4NET-279?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12936004#action_12936004
]
Ron Grabowski commented on LOG4NET-279:
---
log4net.LogManager.Shutdown
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LOG4NET-278?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12936005#action_12936005
]
Ron Grabowski commented on LOG4NET-278:
---
The issue
I just read that nant has a new release candidate out that supports .NET 4.0.
Someone may want to try running that against the code base as that's how the
final releases are built.
- Original Message
From: Dominik Psenner dpsen...@gmail.com
To: Log4NET Dev
years ago...
before any major refactor is done to require .net 2.0 can a new
release be made, there is a lot of stuff in trunk that would heal some
pain.
cheers.
On Mon, May 3, 2010 at 1:57 PM, Ron Grabowski rongrabow...@yahoo.com wrote:
Its not dead. I read the mailing list every day
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LOG4NET-248?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Ron Grabowski resolved LOG4NET-248.
---
Resolution: Invalid
Doesn't sound like the problem is with log4net if it works correctly
You should be able to build both from their respective trunks then reference
your build where appropriate?
From: Preet Sangha preet.san...@aderant.com
To: log4net-dev@logging.apache.org log4net-dev@logging.apache.org
Sent: Sun, December 13, 2009 5:28:09 PM
Hi Eike, I received your email. The best thing to do is comment, vote, or write
patches for these items for the 1.2.11 release:
https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/IssueNavigator.jspa?reset=truemode=hidesorter/order=DESCsorter/field=priorityresolution=-1pid=10690fixfor=12310980
If you think
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LOG4NET-154?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Ron Grabowski reassigned LOG4NET-154:
-
Assignee: Ron Grabowski
Add a StackTracePatternConverter to display method calls
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LOG4NET-225?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Ron Grabowski resolved LOG4NET-225.
---
Resolution: Invalid
Don't log while logging within the same LoggerRepository
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LOG4NET-235?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12778669#action_12778669
]
Ron Grabowski commented on LOG4NET-235:
---
Can you think of a better way to expose
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LOG4NET-201?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12767646#action_12767646
]
Ron Grabowski commented on LOG4NET-201:
---
Here's a ~50 line
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LOG4NET-225?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12767201#action_12767201
]
Ron Grabowski commented on LOG4NET-225:
---
DRIN, the problem is that you shouldn't
,
Omer Mor (omer@gmail.com)
On Fri, Aug 7, 2009 at 12:44 PM, Omer Mor omer@gmail.com wrote:
I prefer debugging the situation live.
Is it so hard to re-compile 1.2.10 with pdb? It's just a matter of a slight
tweak in the project settings.
On Fri, Aug 7, 2009 at 6:12 AM, Ron Grabowski
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LOG4NET-225?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12742149#action_12742149
]
Ron Grabowski commented on LOG4NET-225:
---
Sounds like you have a general logging
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LOG4NET-27?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12716776#action_12716776
]
Ron Grabowski commented on LOG4NET-27:
--
Thanks for the patch! Is there anyway you can
I replaced the string.IsNullOrEmpty call with Length != 0 in
StackTracePatternConverter.cs
- Original Message
From: carn...@apache.org carn...@apache.org
To: log4net-dev@logging.apache.org
Sent: Sunday, May 31, 2009 3:55:29 AM
Subject: [g...@vmgump]: Project logging-log4net (in module
: Other
Affects Versions: 1.2.11
Reporter: Ron Grabowski
Priority: Minor
Fix For: 1.2.11
There isn't a standard way of passing in more than just a single value into
pattern converters:
%logger{2}
Create a simple parser that can split out the Option string
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LOG4NET-200?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Ron Grabowski resolved LOG4NET-200.
---
Resolution: Cannot Reproduce
There hasn't been any additional comments on this item since 2
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LOG4NET-192?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Ron Grabowski resolved LOG4NET-192.
---
Resolution: Cannot Reproduce
There hasn't been any additional posts on this item
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LOG4NET-207?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Ron Grabowski resolved LOG4NET-207.
---
Resolution: Invalid
This is a Visual Studio warning...not an error preventing your program
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LOG4NET-136?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12712760#action_12712760
]
Ron Grabowski commented on LOG4NET-136:
---
My implementation attempts to convert
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LOG4NET-136?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Ron Grabowski updated LOG4NET-136:
--
Attachment: ConsoleApplication3-GenericPrettyPrinter.zip
Sample code to convert
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LOG4NET-136?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12712577#action_12712577
]
Ron Grabowski commented on LOG4NET-136:
---
I'm still surprised that I couldn't find
This should be fixed. I forgot to commit the StackTracePatternConverter.cs file.
- Original Message
From: carn...@apache.org carn...@apache.org
To: log4net-dev@logging.apache.org
Sent: Sunday, May 24, 2009 7:49:41 PM
Subject: [g...@vmgump]: Project logging-log4net (in module
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LOG4NET-55?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12708299#action_12708299
]
Ron Grabowski commented on LOG4NET-55:
--
Don't you want to know when something that's
The following examples are only available in the log4net release download, not
on-line. To obtain the examples download one of the log4net releases.
- Original Message
From: Johan Compen joh...@gmail.com
To: log4net-dev@logging.apache.org
Sent: Tuesday, March 31, 2009 9:38:03 AM
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LOG4NET-20?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12683250#action_12683250
]
Ron Grabowski commented on LOG4NET-20:
--
How about this syntax?
appender name
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LOG4NET-186?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12682357#action_12682357
]
Ron Grabowski commented on LOG4NET-186:
---
I believe you're highlighting
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LOG4NET-180?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12682365#action_12682365
]
Ron Grabowski commented on LOG4NET-180:
---
It sounds like a server issue. Have you
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LOG4NET-193?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Ron Grabowski resolved LOG4NET-193.
---
Resolution: Fixed
Fixed in r754496. Made the two lists consistent.
Supported Frameworks
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LOG4NET-189?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Ron Grabowski resolved LOG4NET-189.
---
Resolution: Won't Fix
I haven't heard any additional discussions why we should change
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LOG4NET-188?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Ron Grabowski resolved LOG4NET-188.
---
Resolution: Cannot Reproduce
You mentioned the rolling works fine in one project
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LOG4NET-202?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12682055#action_12682055
]
Ron Grabowski commented on LOG4NET-202:
---
Have you tried using SqlDbType.Text
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LOG4NET-197?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12682063#action_12682063
]
Ron Grabowski commented on LOG4NET-197:
---
Here are my wget debug logs from a computer
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LOG4NET-196?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12682070#action_12682070
]
Ron Grabowski commented on LOG4NET-196:
---
Can you give a better example of what you
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LOG4NET-195?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Ron Grabowski resolved LOG4NET-195.
---
Resolution: Later
Thanks for the discussion. There will eventually be an async appender
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LOG4NET-194?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12682072#action_12682072
]
Ron Grabowski commented on LOG4NET-194:
---
How can I test this on a Windows XP, VS2005
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LOG4NET-146?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Ron Grabowski resolved LOG4NET-146.
---
Resolution: Cannot Reproduce
I took a look at DefaultRenderer and it looks like
Log4net doesn't have anything built-in to support that. One strategy might be
to keep the logger / at DEBUG and set the appender /'s threshold to WARN.
If the number of warnings overflows some allowable level, you could change that
appender /'s threshold to INFO for a certain amount of time
on this issue going
forward.
Jason
On 2/17/09, Ron Grabowski wrote:
The best place to put your code would be on a new JIRA ticket and make sure
to grant the ok to include into a ASF project.
I've been thinking about a feature like this but I wanted to get the
remaining tickets
The simplest solution is to use a logger per class instead of one shared logger.
- Original Message
From: rodchar rodc...@hotmail.com
To: log4net-dev@logging.apache.org
Sent: Friday, February 20, 2009 10:54:25 AM
Subject: log definition is in my pagebase
Hi all,
i have a pagebase
When you run your program as a normal user can you write to the EventLog
without using log4net?
- Original Message
From: rodchar rodc...@hotmail.com
To: log4net-dev@logging.apache.org
Sent: Wednesday, February 18, 2009 4:45:22 PM
Subject: log4net event logging appender
The best place to put your code would be on a new JIRA ticket and make sure to
grant the ok to include into a ASF project.
I've been thinking about a feature like this but I wanted to get the remaining
tickets for the next version closed out (before 4.0 comes out!!!). My original
plan was to
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LOG4NET-199?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12674086#action_12674086
]
Ron Grabowski commented on LOG4NET-199:
---
The current release of log4net has been out
1 - 100 of 350 matches
Mail list logo
