You could likely delete Ralph's dormant comments on tickets that
aren't too old as they might still be relevant.
On Thu, 10 Sep 2020 at 10:02, Apache wrote:
>
> It is good that you are letting others know your plans. As the only formal
> Log4Net committer you are free to do whatever works for
It is good that you are letting others know your plans. As the only formal
Log4Net committer you are free to do whatever works for you. Hopefully that
won’t remain the case forever.
Ralph
> On Sep 10, 2020, at 2:17 AM, Davyd McColl wrote:
>
> Hi all
>
> I'd like to start (at some point)
My +1
Dominic, if you are going to vote you need to do it formally.
Ralph
> On Sep 10, 2020, at 12:57 AM, Dominik Psenner wrote:
>
> Knowing that those changes are intentional I am confident that the next
> release is better than the last. This is reason enough to move on. If
> something
I'll have time to review the release over the weekend. I'm going on
PTO starting this weekend, too, so I'll likely be doing stuff here a
few random days over the next couple weeks, too.
On Thu, 10 Sep 2020 at 02:57, Dominik Psenner wrote:
>
> Knowing that those changes are intentional I am
Hi all
I'd like to start (at some point) clearing up JIRA a bit and getting on top of
associated pull requests (for example, the one for a REST appender,
https://issues.apache.org/jira/projects/LOG4NET/issues/LOG4NET-644) and I'd
appreciate any guidance on the accepted methods. To clarify, if
Knowing that those changes are intentional I am confident that the next
release is better than the last. This is reason enough to move on. If
something breaks we can still address those issues with another future
release.
--
Sent from my phone. Typos are a kind gift to anyone who happens to find
Hi Dominik
I have had a long look over the changes (both via the PR and locally, as I
contributed to help with some infra changes) and I'm happy -- there's been a
lot of clean-up and simplification and in addition, tests are now run against
all targets -- so that's a good thing. Some of these
Hi
Sorry to not have responded earlier. Time is short and the days are busy. I
looked at the diff and found several suspicious changes. Several hundred
ifdefs have been removed/replaced along with tests. Therefore I have a bad
feeling about those changes without further careful checking. I
Hi
Sorry to be a bother, but I haven't heard anything back on this apart from
Dominik's inquiry into netstandard 1.3 support. I'd really like to get this out
as:
a) it contains the CVE fix that has been asked about so much
b) it solves some issues affecting netstandard users
Thanks
-d
On
Hi all
I realise that I'm causing a bit of a headache by sending mails from my work
account. I'm trying to be more vigilant when sending from my mail client, but
perhaps I need to find a better way, because I just managed to send again from
that account this morning, and I understand that may
10 matches
Mail list logo
