[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENENET-357?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12859414#action_12859414
]
Digy commented on LUCENENET-357:
{quote}
Btw: Should I be using this version (2.9)
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENENET-357?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12859480#action_12859480
]
Frank West commented on LUCENENET-357:
--
I've checked a couple of times for anything
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENENET-357?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12859505#action_12859505
]
Frank West commented on LUCENENET-357:
--
Absolutely agree re: divergence - good
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENENET-357?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12859521#action_12859521
]
Digy commented on LUCENENET-357:
Sorry Frank,
It is not that easy just to say use cache
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENENET-357?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Robert Jordan updated LUCENENET-357:
Attachment: WeakKey.diff
Diggi, the patch fixes the issue by wrapping a WeakReference
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENENET-357?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12859532#action_12859532
]
Robert Jordan commented on LUCENENET-357:
-
DIGY, of course. Sorry for that :)
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MAHOUT-316?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Sean Owen resolved MAHOUT-316.
--
Assignee: Sean Owen
Resolution: Fixed
Good idea, I made this happen.
CardinalityException and
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MAHOUT-379?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Sean Owen updated MAHOUT-379:
-
Status: Resolved (was: Patch Available)
Fix Version/s: 0.4
(was: 0.3)
Today is the day :)
On Tue, Apr 13, 2010 at 5:16 AM, Benson Margulies bimargul...@gmail.comwrote:
Here's a practical matter:
svn layout.
starting at the root we get, I propose:
- sandboxes
- mahout(/trunk,tag,branches)
- collections(/trunk/tag/branches)
sandboxes gives us a
On Apr 21, 2010, at 5:28 AM, Robin Anil wrote:
Today is the day :)
Assuming it passes... (which it should.) We'll have some heavy lifting to do
for a few days/weeks before any practical part of it is noticeable, just so
people have reasonable expectations.
Anyone up for a website
I can help out in the redesign. Is there a CMS approved by apache security,
something which will get patched automatically?
Robin
On Wed, Apr 21, 2010 at 3:34 PM, Grant Ingersoll gsing...@apache.orgwrote:
On Apr 21, 2010, at 5:28 AM, Robin Anil wrote:
Today is the day :)
Assuming it
Confluence?
On Wed, Apr 21, 2010 at 7:10 AM, Robin Anil robin.a...@gmail.com wrote:
I can help out in the redesign. Is there a CMS approved by apache security,
something which will get patched automatically?
Robin
On Wed, Apr 21, 2010 at 3:34 PM, Grant Ingersoll gsing...@apache.org
On Apr 21, 2010, at 7:55 AM, Benson Margulies wrote:
Confluence?
Yeah, that's pretty much it. I'm thinking we have a static front page and then
backed by some pages on Confluence. Check out what http://ofbiz.apache.org.
-Grant
On Wed, Apr 21, 2010 at 7:10 AM, Robin Anil
Yup, same scheme at CXF.
On Wed, Apr 21, 2010 at 8:31 AM, Grant Ingersoll gsing...@apache.orgwrote:
On Apr 21, 2010, at 7:55 AM, Benson Margulies wrote:
Confluence?
Yeah, that's pretty much it. I'm thinking we have a static front page and
then backed by some pages on Confluence. Check
The Board has approved Mahout, Tika, and Nutch moving to be top level status.
Congrats! Now begins the fun part of changing mailing lists, domains, etc.
-Grant
Yeay team!
On 4/21/10 1:09 PM, Grant Ingersoll wrote:
The Board has approved Mahout, Tika, and Nutch moving to be top level status.
Congrats! Now begins the fun part of changing mailing lists, domains, etc.
-Grant
Contratulations everyone!
On Wed, Apr 21, 2010 at 4:42 PM, Jeff Eastman
j...@windwardsolutions.com wrote:
Yeay team!
urm.. Congratulations :-D
On Wed, Apr 21, 2010 at 5:00 PM, Drew Farris drew.far...@gmail.com wrote:
Contratulations everyone!
On Wed, Apr 21, 2010 at 6:04 AM, Grant Ingersoll gsing...@apache.org wrote:
Assuming it passes... (which it should.) We'll have some heavy lifting to
do for a few days/weeks before any practical part of it is noticeable, just
so people have reasonable expectations.
What sort of things
The details are not clear at the moment. But, I am sure this will help
adoption of the mahout quickly.
Things to do. Parse JSON and make the SequenceFiles for use for clustering,
classification and recommendation.
Robin
I thought it would be a bit less confusing if the current toplevel moved
directly to REPO/mahout/mahout instead of moving to REPO/mahout.
On Wed, Apr 21, 2010 at 5:43 PM, Grant Ingersoll gsing...@apache.orgwrote:
On Apr 21, 2010, at 5:01 PM, Drew Farris wrote:
On Wed, Apr 21, 2010 at 6:04
Mahout Vectors and Clusters currently support JSON encodings for input
and output. What else is needed?
Jeff
On 4/21/10 4:18 PM, Robin Anil wrote:
The details are not clear at the moment. But, I am sure this will help
adoption of the mahout quickly.
Things to do. Parse JSON and make the
Probably worth starting another thread for this.
Mahout TLP to-do's:
Website design: Robin
SVN: Grant will take care can take care of the move when we are ready.
Mailing lists: JIRA's for INFRA
Jira/Confluence: the same as today. Can we mod the confluence theme to
match the website?
Implement of AVF algorithm
--
Key: MAHOUT-384
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MAHOUT-384
Project: Mahout
Issue Type: New Feature
Components: Collaborative Filtering
Reporter: tony cui
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MAHOUT-384?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
tony cui updated MAHOUT-384:
Attachment: mahout-384.patch
Implement of AVF algorithm
--
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MAHOUT-384?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12859654#action_12859654
]
tony cui commented on MAHOUT-384:
-
I just committed this patch which realize avf algorithm.
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MAHOUT-384?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12859655#action_12859655
]
tony cui commented on MAHOUT-384:
-
I mean, what am I supposed to do next?
Implement of
Basically support extraction of fields and vector. Here is my public info
graph.facebook.com/robin.anil. Here is coco cola graph.facebook.com/cocacola
http://graph.facebook.com/robin.anilRobin
On Thu, Apr 22, 2010 at 6:08 AM, Jeff Eastman j...@windwardsolutions.comwrote:
Mahout Vectors and
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/NUTCH-710?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12859286#action_12859286
]
Julien Nioche commented on NUTCH-710:
-
As suggested previously we could either treat
The Board has approved Mahout, Tika, and Nutch moving to be top level status.
Congrats! Now begins the fun part of changing mailing lists, domains, etc.
-Grant
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TIKA-242?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Aaron Kaplan updated TIKA-242:
--
Attachment: TikaConfig-patch
Here's a patch that implements this. It adds an optional boolean argument
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2405?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12859352#action_12859352
]
Michael McCandless commented on LUCENE-2405:
Grant was this really Won't Fix?
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2402?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12859377#action_12859377
]
Shai Erera commented on LUCENE-2402:
bq. I think we need to open up a new package
Add Document.set/getSourceID, as an optional hint to IndexWriter to improve
indexing performance
Key: LUCENE-2408
URL:
I like these separate levels, to characterize index compatibility.
As far as I know we've never had a level 3 major release :)
Mike
On Mon, Apr 19, 2010 at 4:28 AM, Doron Cohen cdor...@gmail.com wrote:
Late joining... could we agree on an intention to provide an index
migration tool when/if
Trying to summarize what we seem to be roughly converging to, here:
* Up front: consolidate all Solr core, Lucene core, contrib
analyzers into one place (contrib/analyzers). Don't use Version
in there; instead, the released JAR is versioned. The app picks
its required version
Yeah, sounds like we have the same things in mind here. In fact, this
is pretty similar to what we discussed a while ago on LUCENE-2026 I think.
SegmentWriter could be a higher level interface with more than one
implementation. E.g. there could be one SegmentWriter that supports
appending
I don't advocate to develop PI as an external entity to Lucene, you've
already done that ! :)
We should open up IW enough to develop PI efficiently, but I think we should
always allow some freedom and flexibility to using applications. If IW
simply created a Parallel DW, handle the merges on its
So basically, API-wise, the stable branch will remain like it is
today: API changes under deprecation path, bw breaks as long as they
are documented in CHANGES etc. Trunk will be allowed to change the API
as it sees fit (but still document the changes in CHANGES).
Index-format wise, we adopt
39 matches
Mail list logo
