I am pleased to announce the availability of the Apache PyLucene 2.9.4 and
3.0.3 releases.
Apache PyLucene, a subproject of Apache Lucene, is a Python extension for
accessing Java Lucene. Its goal is to allow you to use Lucene's text
indexing and searching capabilities from Python. It is API
Build: https://hudson.apache.org/hudson/job/Solr-trunk/1344/
All tests passed
Build Log (for compile errors):
[...truncated 20199 lines...]
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org
For additional commands,
Hi
I find it very annoying that I need to set true/false on these methods
whenever I want to control compound files creation. Is it really necessary
to allow writing doc stores in non compound files vs. the other index files
in a compound file? Does somebody know if this feature is used
Incoming LUCENE-2814 drops setUseCompoundDocStore()
On Thu, Dec 16, 2010 at 12:04, Shai Erera ser...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi
I find it very annoying that I need to set true/false on these methods
whenever I want to control compound files creation. Is it really necessary
to allow writing doc
hi Michael,
lucene 4 has so much changes that I don't know how to index and
search with specified codec. could you please give me some code
snipplets that using PFor codec so I can trace the codes.
in you blog
http://chbits.blogspot.com/2010/08/lucene-performance-with-pfordelta-codec.html
Ok perfect !
Shai
On Thu, Dec 16, 2010 at 11:23 AM, Earwin Burrfoot ear...@gmail.com wrote:
Incoming LUCENE-2814 drops setUseCompoundDocStore()
On Thu, Dec 16, 2010 at 12:04, Shai Erera ser...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi
I find it very annoying that I need to set true/false on these methods
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-1993?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Maxim Valyanskiy updated SOLR-1993:
---
Attachment: SOLR-1993-1.4.patch
Patch for Solr 1.4 branch
SolrJ binary update erro when
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-1993?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12972036#action_12972036
]
Maxim Valyanskiy commented on SOLR-1993:
I ported this patch to 1.4 branch and test
On the bulkpostings branch you can do something like this:
CodecProvider cp = new CodecProvider();
cp.register(new PatchedFrameOfRefCodec());
cp.setDefaultFieldCodec(PatchedFrameOfRef);
Then whenever you create an IW or IR, use the advanced method that
accepts a CodecProvider. Then the
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2815?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12972057#action_12972057
]
Michael McCandless commented on LUCENE-2815:
Ugh, nice finds Yonik! We should
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2814?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Earwin Burrfoot updated LUCENE-2814:
Attachment: LUCENE-2814.patch
First iteration.
Passes all tests except TestNRTThreads.
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-2259?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Robert Muir updated SOLR-2259:
--
Attachment: SOLR-2259part2.patch
here is a patch for branch_3x for part 2.
it warns if you are missing
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-2288?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Robert Muir updated SOLR-2288:
--
Attachment: SOLR-2288_namedlist.patch
Hi Hoss Man, thanks for starting this issue.
I looked at your
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2815?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12972096#action_12972096
]
Yonik Seeley commented on LUCENE-2815:
--
bq. but I wonder whether we really should?
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-2288?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12972107#action_12972107
]
Hoss Man commented on SOLR-2288:
Robert: as mentioned, i'm trying to keep a narrow focus on
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-2288?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12972108#action_12972108
]
Robert Muir commented on SOLR-2288:
---
bq. Robert: as mentioned, i'm trying to keep a narrow
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-2288?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12972114#action_12972114
]
Hoss Man commented on SOLR-2288:
bq. just the implementation is different.
fair enough -- i
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-2288?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12972116#action_12972116
]
Ryan McKinley commented on SOLR-2288:
-
For compiler warnings... without chaning the API,
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2723?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12972119#action_12972119
]
Yonik Seeley commented on LUCENE-2723:
--
I tested the optimized index with mike's
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-2288?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12972121#action_12972121
]
Robert Muir commented on SOLR-2288:
---
Separately, i just want to say the following about
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2694?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Simon Willnauer updated LUCENE-2694:
Attachment: LUCENE-2694.patch
Attaching current state - all test pass for me and
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2694?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12972127#action_12972127
]
Robert Muir commented on LUCENE-2694:
-
We shouldn't lose the clone() optimization in
The example docs we distribute have a bunch of stores that have the exact
same location. That lead to some head scratching about why changing the
distance in the example queries seemed to make no difference in the number
of returned results then all of a sudden it reduced the number of hits
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-2259?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12972150#action_12972150
]
Robert Muir commented on SOLR-2259:
---
I committed part 2 in revision 1050064.
Improve
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2815?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Michael McCandless updated LUCENE-2815:
---
Fix Version/s: 4.0
MultiFields not thread safe
---
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2814?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12972173#action_12972173
]
Michael McCandless commented on LUCENE-2814:
OK I dug here... the reason why
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2611?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12972176#action_12972176
]
David Smiley commented on LUCENE-2611:
--
It turns out that IntelliJ was rewriting my
I don't think they are all the same, at least not in trunk. I believe there
are a few near San Fran, some near Buffalo, MN (my hometown ;-) ), and some in
Oklahoma. You can see this when you hit the /browse url.
On Dec 16, 2010, at 11:32 AM, Erick Erickson wrote:
The example docs we
On Thu, Dec 16, 2010 at 11:32 AM, Erick Erickson
erickerick...@gmail.com wrote:
The example docs we distribute have a bunch of stores that have the exact
same location. That lead to some head scratching about why changing the
distance in the example queries seemed to make no difference in the
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1410?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
hao yan updated LUCENE-1410:
Attachment: LUCENE-1410.patch
This patch is to add codec support for PForDelta compression algorithms.
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2814?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12972227#action_12972227
]
Michael Busch commented on LUCENE-2814:
---
The shared doc stores are actually already
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2815?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12972258#action_12972258
]
Yonik Seeley commented on LUCENE-2815:
--
bq. It looks like MultiReaderBits also has
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2814?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12972275#action_12972275
]
Michael Busch commented on LUCENE-2814:
---
Well I need to merge with the recent
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2815?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12972281#action_12972281
]
Yonik Seeley commented on LUCENE-2815:
--
I was going to fix InstantiatedIndex, but
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2814?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12972286#action_12972286
]
Michael McCandless commented on LUCENE-2814:
I think taking things one step at
Grant:
Yep, there were fewer than I remembered, but still half a dozen or so ...
but I remember way more than that (somehow 16 comes to mind)... so obviously
some gnome has been in there already... Not all of the ones I remember were
the same at all, but enough were that it was puzzling.
Erik:
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2814?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12972288#action_12972288
]
Michael Busch commented on LUCENE-2814:
---
bq. I think taking things one step at a
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2814?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12972298#action_12972298
]
Earwin Burrfoot commented on LUCENE-2814:
-
So, what's the plan?
stop writing
On Sun, 12 Dec 2010, Andi Vajda wrote:
A patch that improves the finding of jni.h on Mac OS X was integrated.
It made it worth blocking this release and preparing new release artifacts.
No one voted on the [Take 2] artifacts and I hope this is not inconveniencing
anyone.
I also hope that
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2814?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12972302#action_12972302
]
Michael Busch commented on LUCENE-2814:
---
bq. So, what's the plan?
I can't really
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2814?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12972316#action_12972316
]
Earwin Burrfoot commented on LUCENE-2814:
-
Instead of you pulling out docstore
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2815?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Yonik Seeley updated LUCENE-2815:
-
Attachment: LUCENE-2815.patch
Here's a patch that uses a ConcurrentHashMap for the Terms cache,
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2814?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Earwin Burrfoot updated LUCENE-2814:
Attachment: LUCENE-2814.patch
Patch updated to trunk, no nocommits, no *.closeDocStore(),
Build: https://hudson.apache.org/hudson/job/Lucene-trunk/1397/
All tests passed
Build Log (for compile errors):
[...truncated 18399 lines...]
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org
For additional
44 matches
Mail list logo
