+1 for Layout 01
Aaron Powell
Umbraco Core Team Member | FunnelWeb Team Member
http://www.aaron-powell.com | http://twitter.com/slace | Skype: aaron.l.powell
| MSN: aaz...@hotmail.com
-Original Message-
From: Digy [mailto:digyd...@gmail.com]
Sent: Saturday, 26 February 2011 10:42 PM
Think I've found an issue. The class
com.parc.goodstuff.simple.HelloWorldService extends
simple.http.load.BasicService, and my JCC (2.7) chokes on it thusly:
build/_PPD/com/parc/goodstuff/simple/HelloWorld/HelloWorldService.h: At global
scope:
On Sat, 26 Feb 2011, Bill Janssen wrote:
Think I've found an issue. The class
com.parc.goodstuff.simple.HelloWorldService extends
simple.http.load.BasicService, and my JCC (2.7) chokes on it thusly:
build/_PPD/com/parc/goodstuff/simple/HelloWorld/HelloWorldService.h: At global
scope:
On Sat, 26 Feb 2011, Andi Vajda wrote:
On Sat, 26 Feb 2011, Bill Janssen wrote:
Think I've found an issue. The class
com.parc.goodstuff.simple.HelloWorldService extends
simple.http.load.BasicService, and my JCC (2.7) chokes on it thusly:
I'm seeing a lot of errors of the form:
build/_GoodStuff/__wrap07__.cpp:57522: error: ‘class
com::parc::goodstuff::t_FooIterator’ has no member named ‘parameters’
Apparently relating to code like this:
if (!parseArgs(args, ))
{
OBJ_CALL(result = self-object.nextElement());
Andi Vajda va...@apache.org wrote:
On Sat, 26 Feb 2011, Bill Janssen wrote:
I'm seeing a lot of errors of the form:
build/_GoodStuff/__wrap07__.cpp:57522: error: ?class
com::parc::goodstuff::t_FooIterator? has no member named ?parameters?
Apparently relating to code like this:
On Feb 26, 2011, at 18:48, Bill Janssen jans...@parc.com wrote:
Andi Vajda va...@apache.org wrote:
On Sat, 26 Feb 2011, Bill Janssen wrote:
I'm seeing a lot of errors of the form:
build/_GoodStuff/__wrap07__.cpp:57522: error: ?class
com::parc::goodstuff::t_FooIterator? has no member
Build: https://hudson.apache.org/hudson/job/Lucene-Solr-tests-only-trunk/5336/
1 tests failed.
REGRESSION: org.apache.lucene.index.TestNRTThreads.testNRTThreads
Error Message:
null
Stack Trace:
junit.framework.AssertionFailedError:
at
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-2375?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Mark Miller updated SOLR-2375:
--
Affects Version/s: (was: 3.2)
(was: 4.0)
Fix Version/s: 4.0
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-2379?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12999800#comment-12999800
]
Yonik Seeley commented on SOLR-2379:
bq. ASIDE: And what about finally making the move
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-2379?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12999801#comment-12999801
]
Mark Miller commented on SOLR-2379:
---
That almost looks like it could be going away for
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-2379?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12999803#comment-12999803
]
Yonik Seeley commented on SOLR-2379:
Re-reading the link, I think you're right - it's
On Sat, Feb 26, 2011 at 8:43 AM, Simon Willnauer
simon.willna...@googlemail.com wrote:
I am running this now for a while with no failure :(
I haven't been able to reproduce this either.
-Yonik
http://lucidimagination.com
-
To
On Sat, Feb 26, 2011 at 12:30 PM, Michael McCandless
luc...@mikemccandless.com wrote:
Hmmm beast hit a failure, but, a different one from the build:
Maybe we should back this change out, until it can be stabilized on an
issue? I don't like an unstable trunk.
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2881?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12999809#comment-12999809
]
Michael McCandless commented on LUCENE-2881:
One question: we seem to have
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-1942?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12999811#comment-12999811
]
Yonik Seeley commented on SOLR-1942:
Finally got around to reviewing this again - looks
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-2383?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Jan Høydahl updated SOLR-2383:
--
Attachment: SOLR-2383.patch
This last patch adds the following:
* Same generic treatment of facet.dates
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-2383?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Jan Høydahl updated SOLR-2383:
--
Description: Velocity (/browse) GUI has hardcoded price range facet and a
hardcoded manufacturedate_dt
Backport latest /browse improvements to branch_3x
-
Key: SOLR-2385
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-2385
Project: Solr
Issue Type: Improvement
Components: Response
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-2385?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Jan Høydahl updated SOLR-2385:
--
Attachment: SOLR-2385.patch
Attaching a working patch which is upgrading conf/velocity to equal as 4.0
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-1223?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12999820#comment-12999820
]
Frederik Kraus commented on SOLR-1223:
--
I'd rather see a new filterQuery type like ofq
Build: https://hudson.apache.org/hudson/job/Lucene-Solr-tests-only-trunk/5354/
1 tests failed.
REGRESSION:
org.apache.solr.uima.processor.UIMAUpdateRequestProcessorTest.testProcessing
Error Message:
org.apache.uima.analysis_engine.AnalysisEngineProcessException
Stack Trace:
Build: https://hudson.apache.org/hudson/job/Lucene-Solr-tests-only-trunk/5355/
1 tests failed.
FAILED:
org.apache.solr.uima.processor.UIMAUpdateRequestProcessorTest.testProcessing
Error Message:
org.apache.uima.analysis_engine.AnalysisEngineProcessException
Stack Trace:
WTF - you got that running that test with while(true)?
hmm... weird. Not sure if it is related to 2881 though
On Sat, Feb 26, 2011 at 6:30 PM, Michael McCandless
luc...@mikemccandless.com wrote:
Hmmm beast hit a failure, but, a different one from the build:
*** Thread: Lucene Merge Thread #1
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-1656?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Uwe Schindler reassigned SOLR-1656:
---
Assignee: Uwe Schindler
XInclude's are resolved relative CWD, not instance dir
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-1656?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Uwe Schindler updated SOLR-1656:
Fix Version/s: 4.0
3.1
XInclude's are resolved relative CWD, not instance dir
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-1656?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Uwe Schindler updated SOLR-1656:
Attachment: SOLR-1656.patch
Here is a new patch, redesigned:
- The resolver was moved into a util
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-1656?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Uwe Schindler updated SOLR-1656:
Attachment: SOLR-1656.patch
Sorry, last patch was outdated.
XInclude's are resolved relative CWD,
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-1656?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Uwe Schindler updated SOLR-1656:
Attachment: (was: SOLR-1656.patch)
XInclude's are resolved relative CWD, not instance dir
hey there,
a couple of days ago the trunk index format changed with LUCENE-2881
you should re-index any trunk indexes.
its likely if you open up old trunk indexes, you will get an
exception related to Read Past EOF.
Sorry for the delay!
simon
Build: https://hudson.apache.org/hudson/job/Lucene-Solr-tests-only-trunk/5357/
1 tests failed.
FAILED:
org.apache.solr.uima.processor.UIMAUpdateRequestProcessorTest.testProcessing
Error Message:
org.apache.uima.analysis_engine.AnalysisEngineProcessException
Stack Trace:
Build: https://hudson.apache.org/hudson/job/Lucene-Solr-tests-only-3.x/5344/
1 tests failed.
FAILED:
org.apache.solr.uima.processor.UIMAUpdateRequestProcessorTest.testProcessing
Error Message:
org.apache.uima.analysis_engine.AnalysisEngineProcessException
Stack Trace:
UIMA tests are unstable
---
Key: SOLR-2387
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-2387
Project: Solr
Issue Type: Bug
Reporter: Robert Muir
Fix For: 3.1
The UIMA tests fail frequently
Build: https://hudson.apache.org/hudson/job/Lucene-Solr-tests-only-trunk/5358/
1 tests failed.
FAILED:
org.apache.solr.uima.processor.UIMAUpdateRequestProcessorTest.testProcessing
Error Message:
org.apache.uima.analysis_engine.AnalysisEngineProcessException
Stack Trace:
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2881?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12999848#comment-12999848
]
Michael Busch commented on LUCENE-2881:
---
bq. One question: we seem to have lost
Well, after LUCENE-2881 assigning the same fieldNumber to the same
fieldName across segments is best effort - not guaranteed anymore. It
looks like in most cases it works fine, just very rarely we get
different field numbers. I don't see how we can improve the best
effort, because I don't
Build: https://hudson.apache.org/hudson/job/Lucene-Solr-tests-only-trunk/5359/
1 tests failed.
FAILED:
org.apache.solr.uima.processor.UIMAUpdateRequestProcessorTest.testProcessing
Error Message:
org.apache.uima.analysis_engine.AnalysisEngineProcessException
Stack Trace:
Build: https://hudson.apache.org/hudson/job/Lucene-Solr-tests-only-3.x/5346/
1 tests failed.
REGRESSION:
org.apache.solr.uima.processor.UIMAUpdateRequestProcessorTest.testProcessing
Error Message:
org.apache.uima.analysis_engine.AnalysisEngineProcessException
Stack Trace:
Build: https://hudson.apache.org/hudson/job/Lucene-Solr-tests-only-trunk/5360/
1 tests failed.
FAILED:
org.apache.solr.uima.processor.UIMAUpdateRequestProcessorTest.testProcessing
Error Message:
org.apache.uima.analysis_engine.AnalysisEngineProcessException
Stack Trace:
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-1656?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Uwe Schindler updated SOLR-1656:
Attachment: (was: SOLR-1656.patch)
XInclude's are resolved relative CWD, not instance dir
Build: https://hudson.apache.org/hudson/job/Lucene-Solr-tests-only-3.x/5347/
1 tests failed.
FAILED:
org.apache.solr.uima.processor.UIMAUpdateRequestProcessorTest.testProcessing
Error Message:
org.apache.uima.analysis_engine.AnalysisEngineProcessException
Stack Trace:
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-2387?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Tommaso Teofili updated SOLR-2387:
--
Attachment: SOLR2387.patch
Hello Robert,
this is due to an issue on the alchemy remote service
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-2385?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Jan Høydahl updated SOLR-2385:
--
Affects Version/s: 3.1
Backport latest /browse improvements to branch_3x
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-2385?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Jan Høydahl updated SOLR-2385:
--
Attachment: SOLR-2385.patch
This new patch is in svn format.
I think this makes a really good
Highlighter should try and use maxDocCharsToAnalyze in
WeightedSpanTermExtractor when adding a new field to MemoryIndex
---
Key: LUCENE-2939
URL:
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2939?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Mark Miller updated LUCENE-2939:
Attachment: LUCENE-2939.patch
I'm a little rusty on the new tokenstream api, but here is a little
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2939?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12999863#comment-12999863
]
Mark Miller commented on LUCENE-2939:
-
hmmm...didn't quite get it right yet I
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2939?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12999866#comment-12999866
]
Mark Miller commented on LUCENE-2939:
-
only seems to happen when maxDocCharsToAnalyze
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2939?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12999880#comment-12999880
]
Robert Muir commented on LUCENE-2939:
-
i don't know why you get this null pointer
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2939?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12999882#comment-12999882
]
Mark Miller commented on LUCENE-2939:
-
Because this is already a setting on the
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2939?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12999883#comment-12999883
]
Robert Muir commented on LUCENE-2939:
-
Maybe the setting is already there, but I
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2939?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12999884#comment-12999884
]
Mark Miller commented on LUCENE-2939:
-
Fair enough (this setting is well before my
52 matches
Mail list logo
