I sent an email to the db4o team to see what they think. When I get a
response back from them we should have more answers. At that point it
will either be a no on their end or we will have specific items to
discuss.
Scott
On Friday, March 25, 2011, Stefan Bodewig bode...@apache.org wrote:
On
On Fri, Mar 25, 2011 at 2:33 PM, Yonik Seeley
yo...@lucidimagination.com wrote:
Currently, supplying a filter to IndexSearcher.search() assumes that
it's cheaper to run than the main query.
Wait, where do we assume that?
After a match, we always skip on the filter first.
Well, we next() on
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-236?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13011603#comment-13011603
]
Grant Ingersoll commented on SOLR-236:
--
Keep in mind an alternative approach that
I ran into a few kinks w/ signing artifacts (it wasn't finding the maven
artifacts) in Solr and am fixing them. Once that goes through, I will upload
an RC
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org
For
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2990?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Uwe Schindler resolved LUCENE-2990.
---
Resolution: Fixed
Lucene Fields: [New, Patch Available] (was: [New])
Renamed local
When 3.1 is released, update backwards tests in 3.x branch
--
Key: LUCENE-2994
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2994
Project: Lucene - Java
Issue Type: Task
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2994?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Uwe Schindler updated LUCENE-2994:
--
Affects Version/s: 3.2
Fix Version/s: 3.2
When 3.1 is released, update backwards
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2994?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13011610#comment-13011610
]
Uwe Schindler commented on LUCENE-2994:
---
We have to also clone the 3.1
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-2155?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13011613#comment-13011613
]
Robert Muir commented on SOLR-2155:
---
I don't really think things like this (queries etc)
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-2155?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13011615#comment-13011615
]
Grant Ingersoll commented on SOLR-2155:
---
Yeah, I agree. I haven't looked at the
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-2155?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13011616#comment-13011616
]
Robert Muir commented on SOLR-2155:
---
well what would the deprecation have suggested as an
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-2155?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13011619#comment-13011619
]
Chris Male commented on SOLR-2155:
--
In LUCENE-2599 I deprecated the spatial contrib. The
Not really related to this issue, so moving to dev@...
On Mar 26, 2011, at 7:52 AM, Robert Muir (JIRA) wrote:
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-2155?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13011616#comment-13011616
]
Robert
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-1298?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Yonik Seeley reassigned SOLR-1298:
--
Assignee: Yonik Seeley (was: Grant Ingersoll)
FunctionQuery results as pseudo-fields
On Sat, Mar 26, 2011 at 7:32 AM, Robert Muir (JIRA) j...@apache.org wrote:
I don't really think things like this (queries etc) should go into just Solr
I disagree strongly with the sentiment that queries don't belong in Solr.
Everything developed in/for lucene need not be exported to Solr
On Mar 26, 2011, at 8:24 AM, Robert Muir wrote:
On Sat, Mar 26, 2011 at 8:06 AM, Grant Ingersoll gsing...@apache.org wrote:
Not really related to this issue, so moving to dev@...
On Mar 26, 2011, at 7:52 AM, Robert Muir (JIRA) wrote:
[
On Mar 26, 2011, at 9:48 AM, Yonik Seeley wrote:
On Sat, Mar 26, 2011 at 7:32 AM, Robert Muir (JIRA) j...@apache.org wrote:
I don't really think things like this (queries etc) should go into just Solr
I disagree strongly with the sentiment that queries don't belong in Solr.
Everything
On Sat, Mar 26, 2011 at 9:57 AM, Grant Ingersoll gsing...@apache.org wrote:
On Mar 26, 2011, at 9:48 AM, Yonik Seeley wrote:
On Sat, Mar 26, 2011 at 7:32 AM, Robert Muir (JIRA) j...@apache.org wrote:
I don't really think things like this (queries etc) should go into just Solr
I disagree
On Sat, Mar 26, 2011 at 9:48 AM, Yonik Seeley
yo...@lucidimagination.com wrote:
On Sat, Mar 26, 2011 at 7:32 AM, Robert Muir (JIRA) j...@apache.org wrote:
I don't really think things like this (queries etc) should go into just Solr
I disagree strongly with the sentiment that queries don't
I started on tier support, but dropped it when I realized it was broken
beyond repair.
I did no know one could break code beyond repair
Nicolas
On Sat, Mar 26, 2011 at 10:05 AM, Robert Muir rcm...@gmail.com wrote:
On Sat, Mar 26, 2011 at 9:48 AM, Yonik Seeley
yo...@lucidimagination.com wrote:
On Sat, Mar 26, 2011 at 7:32 AM, Robert Muir (JIRA) j...@apache.org wrote:
I don't really think things like this (queries etc) should go into
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-2396?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Robert Muir reassigned SOLR-2396:
-
Assignee: Robert Muir
add [ICU]CollationField
---
Key:
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-2396?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13011646#comment-13011646
]
Robert Muir commented on SOLR-2396:
---
I'd like to commit this in a few days if no one
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-2155?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13011653#comment-13011653
]
David Smiley commented on SOLR-2155:
I plan to finish a couple improvements to this
FYI, I'm working on revamping lucene spatial in general
https://lucene-spatial-playground.googlecode.com/svn/trunk/
http://code.google.com/p/lucene-spatial-playground/
These are just sketch APIs for now, but i hope to get them cleaned up
and contributed soon.
The proposal will be for 3 packages
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-2155?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13011661#comment-13011661
]
Ryan McKinley commented on SOLR-2155:
-
Congratulations on the new baby!
Thinking about
On Sat, Mar 26, 2011 at 11:12 AM, Robert Muir rcm...@gmail.com wrote:
On Sat, Mar 26, 2011 at 11:03 AM, Yonik Seeley
yo...@lucidimagination.com wrote:
On Sat, Mar 26, 2011 at 9:48 AM, Yonik Seeley
yo...@lucidimagination.com wrote:
On Sat, Mar 26, 2011 at 7:32 AM, Robert Muir (JIRA)
No, the question is: what justification is there for adding spatial
support to solr-only, leaving lucene with a broken contrib module,
versus adding it where it belongs and exposing it to solr?
There need not be any linkage to lucene to improve a Solr feature.
If you disagree, we should
On Sat, Mar 26, 2011 at 2:17 PM, Ryan McKinley ryan...@gmail.com wrote:
No, the question is: what justification is there for adding spatial
support to solr-only, leaving lucene with a broken contrib module,
versus adding it where it belongs and exposing it to solr?
There need not be any
On Sat, Mar 26, 2011 at 2:17 PM, Ryan McKinley ryan...@gmail.com wrote:
No, the question is: what justification is there for adding spatial
support to solr-only, leaving lucene with a broken contrib module,
versus adding it where it belongs and exposing it to solr?
There need not be any
Yes, if you are going to use the Data Import Handler, I would say that is the
route to go. You might also look at using an abstraction like Gora instead of
having a dependency directly on HBase.
On Mar 25, 2011, at 4:32 PM, Sterk, Paul (Contractor) wrote:
Hi,
I have a requirement to use
Thanks for the tips. I'm going through the code and javadocs right now, I will
let you know when I have any doubts.
I'm not sure to which part of Lucene I'm intending to right a proposal yet, but
search/query and query parsing sounds interesting.
On Fri, Mar 25, 2011 at 7:15 PM, Adriano
factor out a shared spellchecking module
Key: LUCENE-2995
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2995
Project: Lucene - Java
Issue Type: Task
Reporter: Robert Muir
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2995?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Robert Muir updated LUCENE-2995:
Attachment: LUCENE-2995.patch
Just a quick shot at this (all tests pass).
Really any serious
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-2382?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13011700#comment-13011700
]
Lance Norskog commented on SOLR-2382:
-
Have you tested this under threading?
DIH
Hi,
It really should say: Added Geospatial Support, as it was non-existent in
Solr before.
Most of the work for adding in spatial in Solr consisted of improving
things in Solr to make it easy to leverage the one spatial feature we really
added: distance based functions and parsing support.
On Sun, Mar 27, 2011 at 7:30 AM, Yonik Seeley yo...@lucidimagination.comwrote:
On Sat, Mar 26, 2011 at 2:17 PM, Ryan McKinley ryan...@gmail.com wrote:
No, the question is: what justification is there for adding spatial
support to solr-only, leaving lucene with a broken contrib module,
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2995?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13011711#comment-13011711
]
Chris Male commented on LUCENE-2995:
+1
factor out a shared spellchecking module
Artifacts are at http://people.apache.org/~gsingers/staging_area/rc3/. Please
vote as you see appropriate. Vote closes on March 29th.
I've also updated the Release To Do for both Lucene and Solr and it is
hopefully a lot easier now to produce the artifacts as more of it is automated
Proposed Release Announcement (edits welcome). Also note we can have ASF
Marketing put out a press release if we want.
snip
March 2011, Lucene 3.1 available
The Lucene PMC is pleased to announce the release of Apache Lucene 3.1 and
Apache Solr 3.1.
This release contains numerous bug fixes,
On Mar 26, 2011, at 9:03 PM, Chris Male wrote:
Hi,
It really should say: Added Geospatial Support, as it was non-existent in
Solr before.
Most of the work for adding in spatial in Solr consisted of improving things
in Solr to make it easy to leverage the one spatial feature we really
a couple quick suggestions inline:
On Sat, Mar 26, 2011 at 10:07 PM, Grant Ingersoll gsing...@apache.org wrote:
Proposed Release Announcement (edits welcome). Also note we can have ASF
Marketing put out a press release if we want.
snip
March 2011, Lucene 3.1 available
The Lucene PMC is
Build: https://hudson.apache.org/hudson/job/Lucene-trunk/1511/
1 tests failed.
FAILED: org.apache.lucene.index.TestNRTThreads.testNRTThreads
Error Message:
Some threads threw uncaught exceptions!
Stack Trace:
junit.framework.AssertionFailedError: Some threads threw uncaught exceptions!
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2979?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13011721#comment-13011721
]
Adriano Crestani commented on LUCENE-2979:
--
Hi Phillip,
I like your idea,
Maybe I am too close to this issue and not looking at global
implications like you are
SOLR-2155 seems fairly close to good to go. There are a couple open
issues that David Smiley has been asking for input on.
I would recommend we answer those questions, and commit it. Then we
can look at
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-2382?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13011730#comment-13011730
]
James Dyer commented on SOLR-2382:
--
There is a multi-threaded unit test in
46 matches
Mail list logo
