rewrite solr build system
-
Key: SOLR-2452
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-2452
Project: Solr
Issue Type: Task
Components: Build
Reporter: Robert Muir
Fix For: 3.2,
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-2452?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=1301#comment-1301
]
Robert Muir commented on SOLR-2452:
---
I brought my previous patch up to date and committed
Hello,
Does solr support secure enterprise search?
That's to say, person can only visit to the concerns of the information within
their authorities.
If I wanna meet the goal, what can I do?
Thanks for your help.
2011-04-01
Best wishes
Zhenpeng Fang
方 振鹏
Dept. Software Engineering
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2959?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13014472#comment-13014472
]
David Mark Nemeskey commented on LUCENE-2959:
-
Robert,
As for the problems
Build: https://hudson.apache.org/hudson/job/Lucene-Solr-tests-only-3.x/6591/
1 tests failed.
REGRESSION:
org.apache.lucene.index.TestIndexWriterMergePolicy.testMaxBufferedDocsChange
Error Message:
null
Stack Trace:
junit.framework.AssertionFailedError:
at
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-2378?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Dawid Weiss updated SOLR-2378:
--
Description:
Implement a subclass of Lookup based on finite state automata/ transducers
(Lucene FST
You should really be asking this on the user list
solr-u...@lucene.apache.org.
Solr does not provide any security features - you would be
expected to implement security within your application that you
put in front of Solr.
LucidWorks Enterprise (a commercial package based upon Solr) does
offer
The user list solr-u...@lucene.apache.org. may be the best place to ask. But
if I understand well there is multiple questions in your request:
- one is related to secure access and I would suggest using HTTPS
- user login and for this I suggest to use a portal that manage user logins
(out of SOLR
Mike, can you remember what ordering is required for
add(CharSequence)? I see it requires INPUT_TYPE.BYTE4
assert fst.getInputType() == FST.INPUT_TYPE.BYTE4;
but this would imply the order of full unicode codepoints on the
input? Is this what String comparators do by default (I doubt, but
wanted
On Fri, Apr 1, 2011 at 7:58 AM, Dawid Weiss dawid.we...@gmail.com wrote:
Mike, can you remember what ordering is required for
add(CharSequence)? I see it requires INPUT_TYPE.BYTE4
assert fst.getInputType() == FST.INPUT_TYPE.BYTE4;
but this would imply the order of full unicode codepoints on
(sorry not mike, but) you are right, String.compareTo() compares in
He, he, thanks Robert. We have these anti-child-abuse commercials on
tv right now you never know who's on the other side... how
appropriate for this situation.
utf-16 order by default. this is not consistent with the order the
I committed fix -- this was in the backwards tests...
Mike
http://blog.mikemccandless.com
On Fri, Apr 1, 2011 at 6:35 AM, Apache Hudson Server
hud...@hudson.apache.org wrote:
Build: https://hudson.apache.org/hudson/job/Lucene-Solr-tests-only-3.x/6591/
1 tests failed.
REGRESSION:
On Fri, Apr 1, 2011 at 8:25 AM, Dawid Weiss
dawid.we...@cs.put.poznan.pl wrote:
Yes, this is what I also figured out. The unicode code point order is
also impl. in BytesRef.getUTF8SortedAsUnicodeComparator, correct? For
what I need I'll use raw utf8 byte order, it doesn't matter as long as
Hi
I noticed that 3.1.0's tag in svn is
http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/lucene/dev/tags/lucene_solr_3_1. Should it
not be http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/lucene/dev/tags/lucene_solr_3_1_0? At
least, that's what's specified under Publishing on ReleaseTodo wiki.
Also, the common-build.xml under
On Fri, Apr 1, 2011 at 8:29 AM, Robert Muir rcm...@gmail.com wrote:
sorry, since you were talking about the charsequence api to builder, i
assumed for a second you were working with chars/Strings, and forgot
about how this is confusingly mixed with, yet distinct from, the whole
BYTE1/BYTE4
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2573?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13014538#comment-13014538
]
Simon Willnauer commented on LUCENE-2573:
-
bq. Thanks, Simon, for running the
On Fri, Apr 1, 2011 at 8:31 AM, Shai Erera ser...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi
I noticed that 3.1.0's tag in svn is
http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/lucene/dev/tags/lucene_solr_3_1. Should it
not be http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/lucene/dev/tags/lucene_solr_3_1_0? At
least, that's what's specified
On Fri, Apr 1, 2011 at 8:42 AM, Robert Muir rcm...@gmail.com wrote:
On Fri, Apr 1, 2011 at 8:31 AM, Shai Erera ser...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi
I noticed that 3.1.0's tag in svn is
http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/lucene/dev/tags/lucene_solr_3_1. Should it
not be
On Apr 1, 2011, at 8:31 AM, Shai Erera wrote:
Hi
I noticed that 3.1.0's tag in svn is
http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/lucene/dev/tags/lucene_solr_3_1. Should it
not be http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/lucene/dev/tags/lucene_solr_3_1_0? At
least, that's what's specified under Publishing
The branch is ok -- 3_1 branch is intended for 3.1.x future releases indeed.
If we can commit to releasing 3.2 instead of 3.1.1 in case only bug fixes
are present, then I'm ok with it. We'd also need to commit, in general, to
release more often. So if we decide to release say every 3 months, then
sorry, since you were talking about the charsequence api to builder, i
assumed for a second you were working with chars/Strings, and forgot
about how this is confusingly mixed with, yet distinct from, the whole
BYTE1/BYTE4 selection in builder :)
I am working with strings because that's what
On Fri, Apr 1, 2011 at 8:49 AM, Shai Erera ser...@gmail.com wrote:
The branch is ok -- 3_1 branch is intended for 3.1.x future releases indeed.
If we can commit to releasing 3.2 instead of 3.1.1 in case only bug fixes
are present, then I'm ok with it. We'd also need to commit, in general, to
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2959?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13014547#comment-13014547
]
Robert Muir commented on LUCENE-2959:
-
{quote}
One thing that is not clear for me is
Hi Shai,
On 4/1/2011 at 8:32 AM, Shai Erera wrote:
Also, the common-build.xml under the tag and the downloaded sources
specifies version to be 3.1-SNAPSHOT. On the ReleaseTodo I found
this: ... and the default version in lucene/common-build.xml on
the branch to X.Y (remove the -SNAPSHOT
Dear Lucene.NET Developers,
This email was sent by an automated system on behalf of the Apache Incubator
PMC.
It is an initial reminder to give you plenty of time to prepare your quarterly
board report.
The board meeting is scheduled for Wed, 20 April 2011, 10 am Pacific. The
report
for your
On Fri, Apr 1, 2011 at 9:22 AM, Jan Høydahl jan@cominvent.com wrote:
Testing the new Solr 3.1 release under Windows XP and Java 1.6.0_23
When trying to post example\exampledocs\gb18030-example.xml using post.jar I
get this error:
% java -jar post.jar gb18030-example.xml
jar
On Fri, Apr 1, 2011 at 10:00 AM, Yonik Seeley
yo...@lucidimagination.com wrote:
On Fri, Apr 1, 2011 at 9:22 AM, Jan Høydahl jan@cominvent.com wrote:
Testing the new Solr 3.1 release under Windows XP and Java 1.6.0_23
When trying to post example\exampledocs\gb18030-example.xml using
On Fri, Apr 1, 2011 at 9:22 AM, Jan Høydahl jan@cominvent.com wrote:
Testing the new Solr 3.1 release under Windows XP and Java 1.6.0_23
When trying to post example\exampledocs\gb18030-example.xml using
post.jar I get this error:
% java -jar post.jar gb18030-example.xml
jar
On Fri, Apr 1, 2011 at 10:07 AM, Robert Muir rcm...@gmail.com wrote:
On Fri, Apr 1, 2011 at 10:00 AM, Yonik Seeley
yo...@lucidimagination.com wrote:
On Fri, Apr 1, 2011 at 9:22 AM, Jan Høydahl jan@cominvent.com wrote:
Testing the new Solr 3.1 release under Windows XP and Java 1.6.0_23
Build: https://hudson.apache.org/hudson/job/Lucene-Solr-Maven-trunk/76/
No tests ran.
Build Log (for compile errors):
[...truncated 9507 lines...]
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org
For additional
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2959?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13014619#comment-13014619
]
David Mark Nemeskey commented on LUCENE-2959:
-
{quote}
I think you can decide
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-2061?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Steven Rowe updated SOLR-2061:
--
Attachment: SOLR-2061.patch
This patch includes a new Test Framework Javadoc link from the Solr
Ok, we can keep SNAPSHOT. I was just thinking it'll be nice if the tag
sets the right version, for convenience. It's not so hard to do.
BTW, I don't build the code, just run jar-src so I can attach the
source to the jars for debugging purposes. If we had packaged them
already (not that I propose
Hi Yonik,
I started my virtual box with fresh windows xp snapshot. Downloaded JDK
1.6.0_24 and Solr 3.1.0. Started solr and then java -jar post.jar *.xml -
success.
You should before we start to fix something that's not an issue ask this
person which JDK exactly he uses and where he downloaded
Shai, the source jars are available from the maven central repo, e.g.:
http://repo2.maven.org/maven2/org/apache/lucene/lucene-core/3.1.0/lucene-core-3.1.0-sources.jar
-Original Message-
From: Shai Erera [mailto:ser...@gmail.com]
Sent: Friday, April 01, 2011 11:12 AM
To:
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-3003?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13014703#comment-13014703
]
Yonik Seeley commented on LUCENE-3003:
--
bq. Attached: 32-bit results
Ah, bummer.
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-2052?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
tylerw updated SOLR-2052:
-
Attachment: SOLR-2052-4.patch
Updated patch that applies cleanly against trunk and works with groups/field
Thanks !
Shai
On Friday, April 1, 2011, Steven A Rowe sar...@syr.edu wrote:
Shai, the source jars are available from the maven central repo, e.g.:
http://repo2.maven.org/maven2/org/apache/lucene/lucene-core/3.1.0/lucene-core-3.1.0-sources.jar
-Original Message-
From: Shai Erera
Yeah, have noticed this shortly ago, too.
-
Uwe Schindler
H.-H.-Meier-Allee 63, D-28213 Bremen
http://www.thetaphi.de
eMail: u...@thetaphi.de
-Original Message-
From: Shai Erera [mailto:ser...@gmail.com]
Sent: Friday, April 01, 2011 5:57 PM
To: dev@lucene.apache.org
Subject:
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-3003?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13014723#comment-13014723
]
Michael McCandless commented on LUCENE-3003:
bq. It is inefficient - but I
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2573?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13014724#comment-13014724
]
Michael Busch commented on LUCENE-2573:
---
Awesome speedup! Finally all this work
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1076?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Michael McCandless updated LUCENE-1076:
---
Attachment: LUCENE-1076.patch
Phew, this patch almost fell below the event horizon
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-3006?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Steven Rowe updated LUCENE-3006:
Attachment: LUCENE-3006-modules-javadoc-warning-cleanup.patch
Patch annihilating modules/ javadoc
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-3006?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13014767#comment-13014767
]
Steven Rowe commented on LUCENE-3006:
-
bq. Patch annihilating modules/ javadoc
This build failed because of javadocs warnings under modules/. I committed
fixes under LUCENE-3006.
I guess the nightly Ant Lucene trunk build doesn't build modules/ javadocs?
Steve
-Original Message-
From: Apache Hudson Server [mailto:hud...@hudson.apache.org]
Sent: Friday, April
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-2061?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Steven Rowe resolved SOLR-2061.
---
Resolution: Fixed
Committed:
- trunk: r1087722, r1087723, r1087834
- branch_3x: r1087833
Generate
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-2061?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13014773#comment-13014773
]
Steven Rowe edited comment on SOLR-2061 at 4/1/11 6:02 PM:
---
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-2061?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13014773#comment-13014773
]
Steven Rowe edited comment on SOLR-2061 at 4/1/11 6:04 PM:
---
Build: https://hudson.apache.org/hudson/job/Lucene-Solr-tests-only-trunk/6613/
1 tests failed.
FAILED: org.apache.lucene.index.TestIndexWriter.testIndexingThenDeleting
Error Message:
Java heap space
Stack Trace:
java.lang.OutOfMemoryError: Java heap space
at
Build: https://hudson.apache.org/hudson/job/Lucene-Solr-tests-only-trunk/6615/
1 tests failed.
REGRESSION: org.apache.solr.spelling.suggest.SuggesterTest.testBenchmark
Error Message:
Java heap space
Stack Trace:
java.lang.OutOfMemoryError: Java heap space
at
Build: https://hudson.apache.org/hudson/job/Lucene-Solr-tests-only-trunk/6616/
1 tests failed.
FAILED: org.apache.solr.spelling.suggest.SuggesterTest.testBenchmark
Error Message:
Java heap space
Stack Trace:
java.lang.OutOfMemoryError: Java heap space
at
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-2444?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Ryan McKinley updated SOLR-2444:
Summary: Update fl syntax to support: pseudo fields, AS, transformers, and
wildcards (was: support
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-2444?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13014838#comment-13014838
]
Ryan McKinley commented on SOLR-2444:
-
Just commited the changes -- yonik, i replaced
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-2155?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13014841#comment-13014841
]
David Smiley commented on SOLR-2155:
To anyone listening: I'll continue to support my
Build: https://hudson.apache.org/hudson/job/Lucene-Solr-tests-only-trunk/6619/
1 tests failed.
REGRESSION: org.apache.solr.spelling.suggest.SuggesterTest.testBenchmark
Error Message:
Java heap space
Stack Trace:
java.lang.OutOfMemoryError: Java heap space
at
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-2433?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Ryan McKinley resolved SOLR-2433.
-
Resolution: Fixed
Fix Version/s: 3.2
Assignee: Ryan McKinley
Make
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-332?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Ryan McKinley resolved SOLR-332.
Resolution: Fixed
made protected in SOLR-2433
Visibility of static int fields in FieldProperties
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-2155?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13014873#comment-13014873
]
Lance Norskog commented on SOLR-2155:
-
Excellent! Geo is a complex topic, too big for a
I'm confused ... this isn't a troubleshooting page, it's a request for
help diagnosing an error -- there's no tips/tricks/advice here, just
someone getting confused between solr.xml and tomcat context files.
shouldn't we just delete this?
: The Troubleshooting page has been changed by
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-2335?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Hoss Man updated SOLR-2335:
---
Description:
FunctionQParser has some simplistic assumptions about what types of field names
it will deal
Build: https://hudson.apache.org/hudson/job/Lucene-Solr-tests-only-trunk/6624/
1 tests failed.
REGRESSION: org.apache.solr.spelling.suggest.SuggesterTest.testBenchmark
Error Message:
Java heap space
Stack Trace:
java.lang.OutOfMemoryError: Java heap space
at
On Fri, Apr 1, 2011 at 8:55 PM, Chris Hostetter
hossman_luc...@fucit.org wrote:
I'm confused ... this isn't a troubleshooting page, it's a request for
help diagnosing an error -- there's no tips/tricks/advice here, just
someone getting confused between solr.xml and tomcat context files.
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-2335?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13014935#comment-13014935
]
Yonik Seeley commented on SOLR-2335:
oh, that's clever. I like it!
FunctionQParser
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-2335?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13014936#comment-13014936
]
Hoss Man commented on SOLR-2335:
the other thing this should make possible is sorting on
Build: https://hudson.apache.org/hudson/job/Lucene-Solr-tests-only-3.x/6613/
1 tests failed.
REGRESSION: org.apache.lucene.collation.TestCollationKeyAnalyzer.testThreadSafe
Error Message:
Java heap space
Stack Trace:
java.lang.OutOfMemoryError: Java heap space
at
Build: https://hudson.apache.org/hudson/job/Lucene-Solr-tests-only-trunk/6625/
1 tests failed.
FAILED: org.apache.solr.spelling.suggest.SuggesterTest.testBenchmark
Error Message:
Java heap space
Stack Trace:
java.lang.OutOfMemoryError: Java heap space
at
66 matches
Mail list logo
