While trying to set up a test for Contrib.IsolatedStorage, I'm running into an
issue I haven't been able to solve.
{System.TypeLoadException: Could not load type 'Lucene.Net.Documents.Document'
from assembly 'Lucene.Net, Version=2.9.4.2, Culture=neutral,
PublicKeyToken=null'.
at
I have - I wasn't sure how to fake IsolatedStorage and figured I'd just try and
get it running in a wp7 app with the emulator, then go back and start filling
in holes (like the test proj)
From: digyd...@gmail.com
To:
was it compiled against the wp7 version of silverlight? or .net full
framework?
On Sat, Jun 11, 2011 at 6:28 PM, Prescott Nasser geobmx...@hotmail.comwrote:
I have - I wasn't sure how to fake IsolatedStorage and figured I'd just try
and get it running in a wp7 app with the emulator, then go
Hmm, that's likely it. Do you know a fast way to compile Lucene.Net and the
IsolatedStorage to the silverlight framework? I could create new wp7 class
projects and import all the files, but surely there is another way?
Date: Sat, 11 Jun 2011
In the past people have used project linker. However there is something
newer that could be use which is the portable class library:
http://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/gg597391.aspx
Either way, unless someone knows an easier way (possibly changing the
project guids), you'll have to use a
If thats the case, I'd propose exploring the portable class library project
for the long run.
Its supposed to constrain you to the shared APIs that are available in the
target frameworks chosen. (xna/xbox, the full framework, silverlight,
windows mobile 7 silverlight).
Then it should allow you
I'll investigate it a bit. So far though there are issues with making lucene
wp7 compatible ATM. As I fix things more issues pop up.
Definitely something I'll look closely at though
Sent from my Windows Phone
-Original Message-
From: Michael Herndon
Sent: Saturday, June 11, 2011 6:30
-0 ... wouldn't that mean that users running *actual* 1.5 JVM installs
couldn't compile from source? I think it would be a bad idea to say that
our compile JVM requirements are differnet then our run JVM
requirements. I'd be more in favor of requireing 1.6 then having a weird
build where
On Sat, Jun 11, 2011 at 8:04 AM, Dawid Weiss
dawid.we...@cs.put.poznan.pl wrote:
-0 ... wouldn't that mean that users running *actual* 1.5 JVM installs
couldn't compile from source? I think it would be a bad idea to say that
our compile JVM requirements are differnet then our run JVM
just want to mention there is Android *duck* and they have 1.5 compat :)
Yup, I still count them in as would-be happy with lucene 1.5 binary folks :)
Dawid
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org
For
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-3174?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
David Mark Nemeskey updated LUCENE-3174:
Attachment: LUCENE-3174.patch
Made Similarity.Stats static.
However, passing
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-3191?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13047877#comment-13047877
]
Michael McCandless commented on LUCENE-3191:
Thanks Uwe; I'll fix that.
Add
Hi
I wrote a TwoPhaseCommit interface which declares the methods necessary
to implement a 2-phase commit algorithm:
* prepareCommit()
* commit()
* rollback()
The prepare/commit ones have variants that take a (MapString,String
commitData) following the ones we have in IndexWriter.
I also wrote
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-2400?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Uwe Schindler updated SOLR-2400:
Attachment: SOLR-2400.patch
Here a new patch with test case for the positionHistory. It also adds
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-3174?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13047889#comment-13047889
]
Robert Muir commented on LUCENE-3174:
-
{quote}
However, passing Stats to the methods
This sounds great!
Mike McCandless
http://blog.mikemccandless.com
On Sat, Jun 11, 2011 at 7:28 AM, Shai Erera ser...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi
I wrote a TwoPhaseCommit interface which declares the methods necessary
to implement a 2-phase commit algorithm:
* prepareCommit()
* commit()
*
SortField.INT / SortField.FLOAT inconsistency with DocValues
Key: LUCENE-3192
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-3192
Project: Lucene - Java
Issue Type: Wish
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-3192?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Uwe Schindler reassigned LUCENE-3192:
-
Assignee: Simon Willnauer
SortField.INT / SortField.FLOAT inconsistency with DocValues
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-3192?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13047890#comment-13047890
]
Uwe Schindler commented on LUCENE-3192:
---
This comment is not really related to this
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-3192?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13047892#comment-13047892
]
Uwe Schindler commented on LUCENE-3192:
---
One more bug: useIndexValues is not used
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-3192?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13047893#comment-13047893
]
Uwe Schindler commented on LUCENE-3192:
---
There is SortField.BYTES already there,
TwoPhaseCommit interface
Key: LUCENE-3193
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-3193
Project: Lucene - Java
Issue Type: New Feature
Components: core/index
Reporter: Shai Erera
Thanks Mike. Opened LUCENE-3193.
Shai
On Sat, Jun 11, 2011 at 3:00 PM, Michael McCandless
luc...@mikemccandless.com wrote:
This sounds great!
Mike McCandless
http://blog.mikemccandless.com
On Sat, Jun 11, 2011 at 7:28 AM, Shai Erera ser...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi
I wrote a
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-3193?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Shai Erera updated LUCENE-3193:
---
Attachment: LUCENE-3193.patch
Patch introduces:
* TwoPhaseCommit interface
* TPCTool (inner to TPC
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-3193?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13047896#comment-13047896
]
Shai Erera edited comment on LUCENE-3193 at 6/11/11 12:56 PM:
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-1972?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Adrien Grand updated SOLR-1972:
---
Attachment: SOLR-1972.patch
This patches adds rolling statistics (same as non-rolling statistics,
On Sat, Jun 11, 2011 at 2:00 PM, Michael McCandless
luc...@mikemccandless.com wrote:
This sounds great!
+1
Mike McCandless
http://blog.mikemccandless.com
On Sat, Jun 11, 2011 at 7:28 AM, Shai Erera ser...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi
I wrote a TwoPhaseCommit interface which declares the methods
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-2586?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13047899#comment-13047899
]
Mark Miller commented on SOLR-2586:
---
bq. Since this example setup isn't a real
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-3188?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13047900#comment-13047900
]
Steven Rowe commented on LUCENE-3188:
-
Mike McCandless reviewed for me; see [the IRC
SolrCloud should allow for partial results should a shard be unavailable
Key: SOLR-2587
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-2587
Project: Solr
Issue Type:
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-2337?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13047911#comment-13047911
]
Martijn van Groningen commented on SOLR-2337:
-
Hi Bill, I think we can just get
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-2586?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13047915#comment-13047915
]
David Smiley commented on SOLR-2586:
If people actually run it in place in a production
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-2564?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Martijn van Groningen updated SOLR-2564:
Attachment: SOLR-2564.patch
Added updated patch.
* The caching behaviour is now
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-2564?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13047918#comment-13047918
]
Martijn van Groningen commented on SOLR-2564:
-
bq. it looks like we should hold
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-2587?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Mark Miller updated SOLR-2587:
--
Affects Version/s: (was: 3.2)
Fix Version/s: 4.0
SolrCloud should allow for partial
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-3174?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13047928#comment-13047928
]
David Mark Nemeskey commented on LUCENE-3174:
-
bq. I would disagree in this
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-2337?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13047929#comment-13047929
]
Bill Bell commented on SOLR-2337:
-
Having matches is very useful. I am good with that.
I
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-2337?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13047931#comment-13047931
]
Martijn van Groningen commented on SOLR-2337:
-
bq. I assume the matches would
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-2337?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13047931#comment-13047931
]
Martijn van Groningen edited comment on SOLR-2337 at 6/11/11 4:01 PM:
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-2586?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13047933#comment-13047933
]
Yonik Seeley commented on SOLR-2586:
bq. If people actually run it in place in a
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-3174?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13047941#comment-13047941
]
Robert Muir commented on LUCENE-3174:
-
Right, but there are some serious
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2793?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Varun Thacker updated LUCENE-2793:
--
Attachment: LUCENE-2793.patch
I hope this time I haven't messed up the making the patch. I
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-2045?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13047948#comment-13047948
]
Alexey Serba commented on SOLR-2045:
I encountered the same problem with Derby
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-2400?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Uwe Schindler resolved SOLR-2400.
-
Resolution: Fixed
Fix Version/s: 4.0
3.3
Committed trunk revision:
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-2045?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13047948#comment-13047948
]
Alexey Serba edited comment on SOLR-2045 at 6/11/11 4:57 PM:
-
I
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-2399?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13047950#comment-13047950
]
Uwe Schindler commented on SOLR-2399:
-
SOLR-2400 is now solved, we can now upgrade the
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-2399?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13047952#comment-13047952
]
Uwe Schindler commented on SOLR-2399:
-
The GUI contains some security relevant problems
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-3174?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13047954#comment-13047954
]
David Mark Nemeskey commented on LUCENE-3174:
-
Ok, let's go with
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2793?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13047970#comment-13047970
]
Simon Willnauer commented on LUCENE-2793:
-
hi varun,
looks good, some quick
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-3174?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Robert Muir updated LUCENE-3174:
Attachment: LUCENE-3174_normalize_boost.patch
{quote}
make BooleanWeight friends independent of
remove pdf files from website
-
Key: LUCENE-3194
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-3194
Project: Lucene - Java
Issue Type: Task
Components: general/website
Reporter: Robert
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-3194?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13047985#comment-13047985
]
Mark Miller commented on LUCENE-3194:
-
+1 - I will handsomely reward anyone that
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-3194?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13047988#comment-13047988
]
Robert Muir commented on LUCENE-3194:
-
OK, I will nuke them and see if someone cashes
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-3194?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Robert Muir resolved LUCENE-3194.
-
Resolution: Fixed
remove pdf files from website
-
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-2535?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13047999#comment-13047999
]
Peter Wolanin commented on SOLR-2535:
-
Quick test works - patched the 3.2 source and
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-2535?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13048002#comment-13048002
]
Steven Rowe commented on SOLR-2535:
---
bq. I'm trying to attach it, but jira is throwing a
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-3188?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Steven Rowe updated LUCENE-3188:
Attachment: LUCENE-3188.patch
Attachment with above-described changes.
I plan on committing
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-3188?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Steven Rowe resolved LUCENE-3188.
-
Resolution: Fixed
Committed:
- r1134823: branch_3x
- r1134829: trunk
Thanks Ivan!
The class
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-1972?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13048192#comment-13048192
]
Shawn Heisey commented on SOLR-1972:
Thank you, Adrien! I tried to apply this to Solr
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-3193?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13048216#comment-13048216
]
Shai Erera commented on LUCENE-3193:
This is basically ready for commit. I'd
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-2586?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13048220#comment-13048220
]
David Smiley commented on SOLR-2586:
Well I respectfully disagree with you Yonik. I
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-2586?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13048221#comment-13048221
]
David Smiley commented on SOLR-2586:
So that my build.xml recommended change is not
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-2586?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13048223#comment-13048223
]
Robert Muir commented on SOLR-2586:
---
{quote}
If it's some arcane encoding issue that is
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1768?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13048249#comment-13048249
]
Adriano Crestani commented on LUCENE-1768:
--
Hi Vinicius,
Assuming you are using
64 matches
Mail list logo
