Would like to be able to use a SimpleSpanFragmenter for extrcting whole
sentances
--
Key: LUCENENET-463
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENENET-463
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-3000?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13179338#comment-13179338
]
Ahmet Arslan commented on SOLR-3000:
I think this is duplicate of
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-3000?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Santiago M. Mola resolved SOLR-3000.
Resolution: Duplicate
Right. Thank you Ahmet.
Add support for
ClassCastException, wrong signature definition of QueryResponse.getExplainMap()
- String,String given, but is String, Map
-
Key: SOLR-3002
Query syntax description not precise enough about boolean operators (AND, OR)
-
Key: LUCENE-3674
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-3674
Project: Lucene - Java
Document QueryParser's boolean precedence ignorance
---
Key: LUCENE-3675
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-3675
Project: Lucene - Java
Issue Type: Bug
Components:
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-3001?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13179400#comment-13179400
]
Rafał Kuć commented on SOLR-3001:
-
Mark, I've tried the newest solrcloud branch and I'm
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-3674?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13179401#comment-13179401
]
Uwe Schindler commented on LUCENE-3674:
---
Where is the difference to the previous
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-3675?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13179403#comment-13179403
]
Uwe Schindler commented on LUCENE-3675:
---
Where is the difference to the previous
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-3674?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13179405#comment-13179405
]
Michael Osipov commented on LUCENE-3674:
There is actually one. I made two
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-3674?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13179405#comment-13179405
]
Michael Osipov edited comment on LUCENE-3674 at 1/4/12 10:40 AM:
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-2804?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13179424#comment-13179424
]
Mikhail Khludnev commented on SOLR-2804:
@Hoss
bq. creates new UpdateProcessor
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-3672?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13179480#comment-13179480
]
Michael McCandless commented on LUCENE-3672:
+1 to nuking version, and fixing
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-3628?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Simon Willnauer reassigned LUCENE-3628:
---
Assignee: Simon Willnauer
Cut Norms over to IndexDocValues
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-3672?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13179503#comment-13179503
]
Yonik Seeley commented on LUCENE-3672:
--
Generation isn't as good as version for
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-3628?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Simon Willnauer updated LUCENE-3628:
Attachment: LUCENE-3628.patch
Here is a first patch to cut over norms to DocValues.
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-3668?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Michael McCandless reassigned LUCENE-3668:
--
Assignee: Michael McCandless
offsets issues with multiword synonyms
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-3668?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Michael McCandless updated LUCENE-3668:
---
Attachment: LUCENE-3668.patch
Patch; I think it's ready.
I fixed the syn filter to
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-3672?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13179507#comment-13179507
]
Yonik Seeley commented on LUCENE-3672:
--
Since bumping version and generation on
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-3628?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Simon Willnauer updated LUCENE-3628:
Lucene Fields: New,Patch Available (was: New)
Summary: Cut Norms over to
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-3628?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13179533#comment-13179533
]
Robert Muir commented on LUCENE-3628:
-
thanks for working on this!
at a glance I
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-3628?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13179541#comment-13179541
]
Uwe Schindler commented on LUCENE-3628:
---
Hi I did not yet understand the patch
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-3628?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13179543#comment-13179543
]
Uwe Schindler commented on LUCENE-3628:
---
BTW: I like IOUtils.deleteFiles *g*,
This looks cool!
I ran this a few times:
ant test-core -Dtests.seed=0:0:0 -Dtests.cpus=20
-Dtests.directory=RAMDirectory -Dtests.codec=Lucene40
I fixed seed RAMDir to reduce variance...
[junit4] Slave 16: 0.29 .. 24.65 = 24.36s
[junit4] Slave 17: 0.36 .. 30.62 =
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-3628?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13179554#comment-13179554
]
Michael McCandless commented on LUCENE-3628:
Simon are you using svn 1.7...?
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-3628?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Simon Willnauer updated LUCENE-3628:
Attachment: LUCENE-3628.patch
here is another patch removing unused imports of Lucene3x
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-2993?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13179566#comment-13179566
]
Okke Klein commented on SOLR-2993:
--
If I had to choose I would pick this feature, but I
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-3628?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Simon Willnauer updated LUCENE-3628:
Attachment: LUCENE-3628.patch
new patch with svn diff --show-copies-as-adds
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-3628?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13179593#comment-13179593
]
Uwe Schindler commented on LUCENE-3628:
---
Hi,
much more readable, thanks!
Just one
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-3628?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13179593#comment-13179593
]
Uwe Schindler edited comment on LUCENE-3628 at 1/4/12 4:14 PM:
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-3628?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13179637#comment-13179637
]
Simon Willnauer commented on LUCENE-3628:
-
bq. Just one question: The
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-3002?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13179714#comment-13179714
]
Mark Miller commented on SOLR-3002:
---
please post a stack trace
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-3002?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13179721#comment-13179721
]
Yonik Seeley commented on SOLR-3002:
Perhaps this is due to the structured explain
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-2999?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13179799#comment-13179799
]
Simon Willnauer commented on SOLR-2999:
---
I am not sure if this is easily fixable.
Thanks Mike. Answers/ comments in-line below
[junit4] Slave 16: 0.29 .. 24.65 = 24.36s
[junit4] Slave 17: 0.36 .. 30.62 = 30.26s
[junit4] Slave 18: 0.44 .. 30.84 = 30.41s
[junit4] Slave 19: 0.50 .. 28.65 = 28.15s
[junit4] Execution time
DIH Rollback on failure doesn't revert last_index_time in dataimport.properties
---
Key: SOLR-3003
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-3003
Project: Solr
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-2804?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13179941#comment-13179941
]
Antony Stubbs commented on SOLR-2804:
-
Seems this causes SOLR-3003 :/
@Mikhail, what
Trying again... hopefully this time NOT hitting this nasty Chrome bug:
http://code.google.com/p/chromium/issues/detail?id=102407
On Wed, Jan 4, 2012 at 5:11 PM, Dawid Weiss
dawid.we...@cs.put.poznan.pl wrote:
I forgot how nasty your beast computer is... 20 slaves?! Remind me how many
actual
Maybe... 3rd time's the charm...? (This time from Opera).
On Wed, Jan 4, 2012 at 5:11 PM, Dawid Weiss
dawid.we...@cs.put.poznan.pl wrote:
I forgot how nasty your beast computer is... 20 slaves?! Remind me how
many actual (real) cores do you have?
Beast has two 6-core CPUs (x5680 xeons), so
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-995?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13180013#comment-13180013
]
Ingo Renner commented on LUCENE-995:
would it be possible to back port this to 3.x?
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-2999?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13180075#comment-13180075
]
Jan Høydahl commented on SOLR-2999:
---
Mostly agree to this. Another thing is that the
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-2999?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13180101#comment-13180101
]
Hoss Man commented on SOLR-2999:
bq. as there is less need in general to call optimize
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-2999?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13180119#comment-13180119
]
Hoss Man commented on SOLR-2999:
I forgot to mention...
FWIW: the SpellCheckerListener
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-3001?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13180120#comment-13180120
]
Mark Miller commented on SOLR-3001:
---
Thanks for the verification Rafal - I'll dig into
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-3001?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Mark Miller updated SOLR-3001:
--
Fix Version/s: 4.0
Documents droping when using DistributedUpdateProcessor
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-3001?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Mark Miller reassigned SOLR-3001:
-
Assignee: Mark Miller
Documents droping when using DistributedUpdateProcessor
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-2999?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13180130#comment-13180130
]
Robert Muir commented on SOLR-2999:
---
One thing I would mention is that it seems the
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-1931?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Erick Erickson updated SOLR-1931:
-
Attachment: SOLR-1931-trunk.patch
SOLR-1931-3x.patch
Final patches attached. All
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-3001?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13180209#comment-13180209
]
Mark Miller commented on SOLR-3001:
---
I've committed a fix to the solrcloud branch.
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-3001?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13180213#comment-13180213
]
Mark Miller commented on SOLR-3001:
---
bq. Btw. The fact is the indexing is much, much
With the Python runner I see these run times on just lucene core tests:
2 cpus: 72.2 sec 5 cpus: 35.0 sec 10 cpus: 28.1 sec 15 cpus:
26.2 sec 20 cpus: 26.0 sec 25 cpus: 27.5 sec
I would say this is aligned with my intuition -- after you exceed the
physical number of cores things don't
15 cpus:
[junit4] Slave 0: 0.29 .. 5.16 = 4.87s
...
[junit4] Slave 3: 0.29 .. 24.20 = 23.92s
[junit4] Slave 4: 0.26 .. 27.00 = 26.74s
This is weird -- such discrepancy shouldn't happen after it has some
initial timings unless there was a really skewed
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-1843?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Hoss Man resolved SOLR-1843.
Resolution: Fixed
backported to 3x - r1227440
JMX name collision when running multiple
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-3002?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13180238#comment-13180238
]
Torsten Krah commented on SOLR-3002:
@Mark - Trace already there, its only a one liner
54 matches
Mail list logo