That's similar to a suggestion Stefan made in another email:
The only alternative would be [...] running a
dynamic server on a dedicated VM. The later would
be easier to negotiate for a top level project.
Though, his response seems to imply that it would need to stay hosted on
Apache
So, from what I'm told by the site-dev guys, the first commit of docs would be
a pain in the ass - becuase there are so many files. But as long as you are
rarely updating docs, making other changes to your site should be quick. That
has not been my experience in the past - but this time if it
My understanding is that ASF cares about what is hosted at ASF more
than they care about what isn't hosted at ASF... So you're free to do
whatever you like externally, hence the GitHub mirrors and NuGet and
what not.
Regarding readthedocs -- it uses Sphinx/ReStructured Text...So we'd
have to
I guess it wouldn't be terribly difficult to do, we would have to convert
all of the shfbproj to whatever doxygen uses. I do think it's a little
weird to use the python-style of documentation in a .NET project however.
I personally have never been a fan of python documentation in general
simply
My thought was just we should host our documentation externally and
RTD that was the first thing that came to mind.. You're right that
tool chain is kind of unfortunate.
Another option would be to use GitHub pages and just build our HTMl on
the build server then push to GitHub to update it. Then
Took all day, but Joe was there babysitting and correcting things for us.
Basically there is a bug in svn 1.6.17 that the CMS is based on, which is
making our commits a pain at the moment. Once that gets upgraded it should be
relatively smooth sailing. It won't help us though if we want still
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-3760?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Shai Erera reopened LUCENE-3760:
Sorry guys for not following the issue more closely. We use
IndexReader.getCommitUserData in many
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-3760?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13208278#comment-13208278
]
Uwe Schindler commented on LUCENE-3760:
---
You don't need to open IR:
- use the
Hi,
We decided to leave this method in IR also in 4.0, as this is one of the
most often used methods (almost every example code contains it) and users
may get confused when it is not there.
There are more examples of deprecated methods in 4.0, it's done on a
case-by-case basis. Especially,
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-3760?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13208283#comment-13208283
]
Uwe Schindler commented on LUCENE-3760:
---
By the way: Why is the return value of
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-3088?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13208281#comment-13208281
]
Sami Siren commented on SOLR-3088:
--
Yeah, this can be resolved.
create
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-3760?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13208283#comment-13208283
]
Uwe Schindler edited comment on LUCENE-3760 at 2/15/12 9:04 AM:
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-3768?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13208287#comment-13208287
]
Sami Siren commented on LUCENE-3768:
The latest patch seems to work fine here.
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-3760?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13208298#comment-13208298
]
Shai Erera commented on LUCENE-3760:
The method that you proposes is not very
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-3760?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13208311#comment-13208311
]
Uwe Schindler commented on LUCENE-3760:
---
But we can change that in 4.0?
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-3760?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13208312#comment-13208312
]
Uwe Schindler commented on LUCENE-3760:
---
bq. The method that you proposes is not
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-3760?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13208317#comment-13208317
]
Shai Erera commented on LUCENE-3760:
bq. But we can change that in 4.0?
Yes, in 4.0,
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-3762?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Dawid Weiss reopened LUCENE-3762:
-
Reopening -- method names in reproduction report.
Upgrade JUnit to 4.10, refactor
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-3760?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13208324#comment-13208324
]
Robert Muir commented on LUCENE-3760:
-
I don't think we should: I don't understand
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-3762?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13208322#comment-13208322
]
Dawid Weiss commented on LUCENE-3762:
-
Good catch, Steve -- yes, I might have
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-3760?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13208335#comment-13208335
]
Shai Erera commented on LUCENE-3760:
You mean if IndexReader.getCommitUserData() is
hey guys, I am working on different rewrite methods etc. and the fact
that getEnum is protected drives me nuts. I always have to put stuff
into the o.a.l.search package if I want to access this method and even
further this only works if I am loaded by the same classloader so if
somebody wants to
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-3762?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Dawid Weiss resolved LUCENE-3762.
-
Resolution: Fixed
Upgrade JUnit to 4.10, refactor state-machine of detecting
On 15.02.2012 11:22, dwe...@apache.org wrote:
Author: dweiss
Date: Wed Feb 15 10:22:12 2012
New Revision: 1244424
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1244424view=rev
Log:
LUCENE-3762: follow-up fix of -Dtestname, tests added.
Added:
Separate getting Directory from IndexReader from its concrete subclasses
Key: LUCENE-3788
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-3788
Project: Lucene - Java
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-3788?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Andrzej Bialecki updated LUCENE-3788:
--
Attachment: LUCENE-3788.patch
Initial patch. Following this we may need to change the
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-3788?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13208351#comment-13208351
]
Uwe Schindler commented on LUCENE-3788:
---
Hi Andrzej,
maybe you misunderstood the
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-3788?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13208355#comment-13208355
]
Uwe Schindler commented on LUCENE-3788:
---
Additionally, DirectoryReader is exactly
---
*Regards,*
*Vishal Raj*
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-3788?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13208355#comment-13208355
]
Uwe Schindler edited comment on LUCENE-3788 at 2/15/12 10:53 AM:
On Wed, Feb 15, 2012 at 5:18 AM, Simon Willnauer
simon.willna...@googlemail.com wrote:
hey guys, I am working on different rewrite methods etc. and the fact
that getEnum is protected drives me nuts. I always have to put stuff
into the o.a.l.search package if I want to access this method and
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-3788?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13208359#comment-13208359
]
Uwe Schindler commented on LUCENE-3788:
---
See also LUCENE-3734 for the complete
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-3768?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Robert Muir reassigned LUCENE-3768:
---
Assignee: Robert Muir
Typo in some of the .alg files: ForcMerge instead of ForceMerge
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-3768?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13208372#comment-13208372
]
Robert Muir commented on LUCENE-3768:
-
Thanks Sami, (especially for the test, too)
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-3788?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13208355#comment-13208355
]
Uwe Schindler edited comment on LUCENE-3788 at 2/15/12 11:16 AM:
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-3788?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13208374#comment-13208374
]
Andrzej Bialecki commented on LUCENE-3788:
---
Hi Uwe,
bq. It would be good if
Thanks Uwe.
Can't it be removed from trunk and mentioned in MIGRATE.txt? Does this mean
that 4.0 will be released with those deprecated methods?
Shai
On Wed, Feb 15, 2012 at 11:02 AM, Uwe Schindler u...@thetaphi.de wrote:
Hi,
** **
We decided to leave this method in IR also in 4.0, as
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-3788?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13208351#comment-13208351
]
Uwe Schindler edited comment on LUCENE-3788 at 2/15/12 11:21 AM:
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-3788?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13208381#comment-13208381
]
Uwe Schindler commented on LUCENE-3788:
---
I did not want to complain, it was just
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-3760?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13208382#comment-13208382
]
Robert Muir commented on LUCENE-3760:
-
{quote}
You mean if
Hi Shai,
I think in some cases its good for us to add deprecated APIs to trunk
rather than completely breaking users.
We can look at these as 'migration paths' for the user...
Here is a good example of one i specifically requested (Mike
implemented, thanks!):
It makes sense to me, but it also means that 4.0 will go out with
deprecated API that will exist until 5.0 is out.
I only raised it to learn if this was done by mistake, or there is some
logic behind it. I guess that for me, reading MIGRATE will be enough, but I
cannot speak for others.
I don't
Thanks a lot for the kind words and the warm welcome!
My background is from FAST (now Microsoft) and I've been working on the ESP
search engine for about five years at FAST's RD headquarters in Norway. I
relocated to FAST's Japan office in 2005 and I've been helping selling and
delivering
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-3760?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13208389#comment-13208389
]
Shai Erera commented on LUCENE-3760:
bq. I mean in the full picture of the
On Wed, Feb 15, 2012 at 6:36 AM, Shai Erera ser...@gmail.com wrote:
It makes sense to me, but it also means that 4.0 will go out with deprecated
API that will exist until 5.0 is out.
I only raised it to learn if this was done by mistake, or there is some
logic behind it. I guess that for me,
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-3731?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13208393#comment-13208393
]
Tommaso Teofili commented on LUCENE-3731:
-
Ok, I noticed this was due to an issue
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-3760?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13208395#comment-13208395
]
Shai Erera commented on LUCENE-3760:
You also made that comment:
bq. If someone has
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-3760?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13208396#comment-13208396
]
Robert Muir commented on LUCENE-3760:
-
{quote}
It does load the norms and deleted
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-3760?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13208397#comment-13208397
]
Uwe Schindler commented on LUCENE-3760:
---
bq. I can still use them in 3.x, but won't
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-3760?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13208400#comment-13208400
]
Shai Erera commented on LUCENE-3760:
You're right Uwe, I can do that. But it's still
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-3788?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13208407#comment-13208407
]
Andrzej Bialecki commented on LUCENE-3788:
---
Cool. I really appreciate your
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-3760?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13208408#comment-13208408
]
Uwe Schindler commented on LUCENE-3760:
---
In that case, SegmentInfos is public, so
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-3788?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13208414#comment-13208414
]
Uwe Schindler commented on LUCENE-3788:
---
Thanks,
by the way, I would be glad to see
Build: https://builds.apache.org/job/Lucene-Solr-tests-only-trunk-java7/1736/
1 tests failed.
FAILED:
org.apache.lucene.analysis.uima.UIMATypeAwareAnalyzerTest.testRandomStrings
Error Message:
java.lang.AssertionError: Some threads threw uncaught exceptions!
Stack Trace:
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-3788?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Uwe Schindler closed LUCENE-3788.
-
Resolution: Won't Fix
Assignee: Uwe Schindler
Separate getting Directory from
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-2708?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13208416#comment-13208416
]
Erik commented on SOLR-2708:
This patch would solve my current problem.
I just checked out the
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-2708?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13208418#comment-13208418
]
Chris Male commented on SOLR-2708:
--
I really need to come back to this and simplify it
New binary request/response format using Avro
-
Key: SOLR-3135
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-3135
Project: Solr
Issue Type: New Feature
Components: Response Writers,
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-2708?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13208439#comment-13208439
]
Erik commented on SOLR-2708:
I want to define externally how a @Field annotated attribute is
Build: https://builds.apache.org/job/Lucene-Solr-Maven-3.x/393/
No tests ran.
Build Log (for compile errors):
[...truncated 33624 lines...]
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org
For additional commands,
On Wed, Feb 15, 2012 at 11:55 AM, Robert Muir rcm...@gmail.com wrote:
On Wed, Feb 15, 2012 at 5:18 AM, Simon Willnauer
simon.willna...@googlemail.com wrote:
hey guys, I am working on different rewrite methods etc. and the fact
that getEnum is protected drives me nuts. I always have to put
This might have been caused by my commit, but see my previous email...
its bad that checkouts in lucene appear to be 'broken' in eclipse,
becuase the ant common-build 'xml' is invalid (i dont understand how
this was depending on 'javadocs' task before)
On Wed, Feb 15, 2012 at 8:12 AM, Apache
Hi Simon,
I had the same issue with a customer, too (for a custom RewriteMethod). I used
reflection to call the method :-)
I agree with you, the bug is the following:
getEnum() is protected so it is intended to be called *only* by subclasses
(that’s the idea behind protected methods). They are
On Wed, Feb 15, 2012 at 8:21 AM, Uwe Schindler u...@thetaphi.de wrote:
Another cleaner fix would be to add a protected final method to RewriteMethod
that calls this method from MTQ. So anything subclassing RewriteMethod can
get the enum from inside the RewriteMethod class which is the correct
On Wed, Feb 15, 2012 at 8:21 AM, Uwe Schindler u...@thetaphi.de wrote:
Another cleaner fix would be to add a protected final method to
RewriteMethod that calls this method from MTQ. So anything subclassing
RewriteMethod can get the enum from inside the RewriteMethod class which
is the
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-3731?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13208460#comment-13208460
]
Tommaso Teofili commented on LUCENE-3731:
-
fix for the issues reported by Steven
Expose FilteredTermsEnum from MTQ
--
Key: LUCENE-3789
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-3789
Project: Lucene - Java
Issue Type: Improvement
Components: core/search
Affects
Build: https://builds.apache.org/job/Lucene-Solr-tests-only-trunk-java7/1737/
2 tests failed.
REGRESSION:
org.apache.lucene.analysis.uima.UIMABaseAnalyzerTest.testRandomStrings
Error Message:
java.lang.AssertionError: Some threads threw uncaught exceptions!
Stack Trace:
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-3768?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Robert Muir resolved LUCENE-3768.
-
Resolution: Fixed
Fix Version/s: 4.0
3.6
Thanks Sami, upon
benchmark cannot parse highlight-vs-vector-highlight.alg, but only on 3.x?!
---
Key: LUCENE-3790
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-3790
Project: Lucene - Java
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-3768?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13208523#comment-13208523
]
Robert Muir commented on LUCENE-3768:
-
I opened LUCENE-3790 for the followup bug
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-3790?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13208525#comment-13208525
]
Shai Erera commented on LUCENE-3790:
This is the reason --
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-3790?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13208532#comment-13208532
]
Robert Muir commented on LUCENE-3790:
-
Thanks Shai! I tested this locally and the
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-3790?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Shai Erera resolved LUCENE-3790.
Resolution: Fixed
Assignee: Shai Erera
Committed the fix in rev 1244532.
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-3754?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13208544#comment-13208544
]
Steven Rowe commented on LUCENE-3754:
-
Committed to trunk.
Backporting to branch_3x
Robert,
This was definitely caused by your commit.
Eclipse is wrong: common-build.xml is not a stand-alone Ant file, and
everywhere it is imported, javadocs is defined.
Please revert. (You have been dismissive in the past about catering to IDE
quirks, Robert, so I'm hopeful that you'll
On Wed, Feb 15, 2012 at 10:44 AM, Steven A Rowe sar...@syr.edu wrote:
Robert,
This was definitely caused by your commit.
Eclipse is wrong: common-build.xml is not a stand-alone Ant file, and
everywhere it is imported, javadocs is defined.
No, eclipse is definitely correct. depending on a
Build: https://builds.apache.org/job/Lucene-Solr-Maven-trunk/389/
No tests ran.
Build Log (for compile errors):
[...truncated 10872 lines...]
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org
For additional
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-3778?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13208550#comment-13208550
]
Michael McCandless commented on LUCENE-3778:
This sounds like a good idea!
I agree!
-
Uwe Schindler
H.-H.-Meier-Allee 63, D-28213 Bremen
http://www.thetaphi.de
eMail: u...@thetaphi.de
-Original Message-
From: Robert Muir [mailto:rcm...@gmail.com]
Sent: Wednesday, February 15, 2012 4:51 PM
To: dev@lucene.apache.org
Subject: Re: [JENKINS-MAVEN]
Build: https://builds.apache.org/job/Lucene-Solr-tests-only-trunk-java7/1738/
2 tests failed.
FAILED: org.apache.lucene.analysis.uima.UIMABaseAnalyzerTest.testRandomStrings
Error Message:
java.lang.AssertionError: Some threads threw uncaught exceptions!
Stack Trace:
java.lang.RuntimeException:
The Buildbot has detected a new failure on builder lucene.net-site-staging
while building ASF Buildbot.
Full details are available at:
http://ci.apache.org/builders/lucene.net-site-staging/builds/117
Buildbot URL: http://ci.apache.org/
Buildslave for this Build: bb-cms-slave
Build Reason:
The Buildbot has detected a restored build on builder lucene.net-site-staging
while building ASF Buildbot.
Full details are available at:
http://ci.apache.org/builders/lucene.net-site-staging/builds/119
Buildbot URL: http://ci.apache.org/
Buildslave for this Build: bb-cms-slave
Build Reason:
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-3760?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13208567#comment-13208567
]
Shai Erera commented on LUCENE-3760:
Yes, I know that I can write it. But it means
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-3731?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Robert Muir updated LUCENE-3731:
Attachment: LUCENE-3731_speed.patch
Hi Tommaso, I noticed some of the tests here are really
I think these are thread-safety problems related to using the same
analysis engine instance?
See prototype patch on
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-3731, this is also
causing some performance issues I think.
Currently I think because no CAS is reused, its just slow and the
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-2847?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
James Dyer resolved SOLR-2847.
--
Resolution: Fixed
Trunk: r1244553
Branch_3x: r124459
fix test bug in
FacetField and Count : Override equals() and hashCode()
---
Key: SOLR-3136
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-3136
Project: Solr
Issue Type: Improvement
Components:
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-2847?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13208587#comment-13208587
]
James Dyer edited comment on SOLR-2847 at 2/15/12 5:09 PM:
---
BOM indeed - thanks for the catch.
From: bode...@apache.org
To: lucene-net-...@incubator.apache.org
Date: Tue, 14 Feb 2012 11:02:24 +0100
Subject: Re: [Lucene.Net] Site / docs
On 2012-02-14, Prescott Nasser wrote:
I've been trying to use the upload a tar.gz file to add docs to the
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-3731?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13208609#comment-13208609
]
Robert Muir commented on LUCENE-3731:
-
Tommaso, I will make another prototype patch
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-3731?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Robert Muir updated LUCENE-3731:
Attachment: LUCENE-3731_speed.patch
updated patch:
* each tokenstream gets its own AnalysisEngine
I made some changes to the website in staging. Just a few things regarding
the blog list, a little bit of left padding and adding a recent news header
above it. I also changed the link style a little bit. Feel free to revert
any/all changes I've made. :)
Thanks,
Christopher
On Tue, Feb 14,
Build: https://builds.apache.org/job/Lucene-Solr-tests-only-trunk-java7/1739/
2 tests failed.
FAILED: org.apache.lucene.analysis.uima.UIMABaseAnalyzerTest.testRandomStrings
Error Message:
java.lang.AssertionError: Some threads threw uncaught exceptions!
Stack Trace:
java.lang.RuntimeException:
Ick, I'm in the middle of publishing and working with Joe @ site-dev. We've
totally f'd up svn. He's asked we stop doing things and he's going to fix it
and get back to us... At least we're active.. ;) ~P
Date: Wed, 15 Feb 2012 10:20:29 -0800
From: currens.ch...@gmail.com
To:
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-3731?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Robert Muir updated LUCENE-3731:
Attachment: LUCENE-3731_speed.patch
ok new patch, with more refactoring... no more nocommits :)
Erg. Was it related to the whole documentation thing? I'm pretty sure
it's frowned upon for our documentation to break SVN every time we do a
release, so we should probably figure out a solution for that. :P
Thanks,
Christopher
On Wed, Feb 15, 2012 at 10:28 AM, Prescott Nasser
Why not move docs to http://readthedocs.org/
On Wed, Feb 15, 2012 at 10:45 AM, Christopher Currens
currens.ch...@gmail.com wrote:
Erg. Was it related to the whole documentation thing? I'm pretty sure
it's frowned upon for our documentation to break SVN every time we do a
release, so we
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-3791?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13208711#comment-13208711
]
Uwe Schindler commented on LUCENE-3791:
---
Hey cool, how does that work? I only know
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-3791?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13208733#comment-13208733
]
Dawid Weiss commented on LUCENE-3791:
-
I really can't explain how it works other than
1 - 100 of 130 matches
Mail list logo
