[jira] [Commented] (LUCENE-5202) LookaheadTokenFilter consumes an extra token in nextToken

2013-09-08 Thread Michael McCandless (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-5202?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13761246#comment-13761246 ] Michael McCandless commented on LUCENE-5202: Oh, sorry, I see; I indeed

[jira] [Commented] (LUCENE-5202) LookaheadTokenFilter consumes an extra token in nextToken

2013-09-08 Thread Benson Margulies (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-5202?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13761254#comment-13761254 ] Benson Margulies commented on LUCENE-5202: -- Yes, that's what I have and it

[jira] [Commented] (SOLR-5201) UIMAUpdateRequestProcessor should reuse the AnalysisEngine

2013-09-08 Thread Tommaso Teofili (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-5201?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13761259#comment-13761259 ] Tommaso Teofili commented on SOLR-5201: --- ok good, thanks. I'll merge it to branch_4x

[jira] [Commented] (SOLR-5201) UIMAUpdateRequestProcessor should reuse the AnalysisEngine

2013-09-08 Thread ASF subversion and git services (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-5201?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13761260#comment-13761260 ] ASF subversion and git services commented on SOLR-5201: --- Commit

[JENKINS] Lucene-Solr-NightlyTests-trunk - Build # 374 - Failure

2013-09-08 Thread Apache Jenkins Server
Build: https://builds.apache.org/job/Lucene-Solr-NightlyTests-trunk/374/ 1 tests failed. REGRESSION: org.apache.lucene.index.Test2BPostings.test Error Message: GC overhead limit exceeded Stack Trace: java.lang.OutOfMemoryError: GC overhead limit exceeded at

[jira] [Commented] (LUCENE-5202) LookaheadTokenFilter consumes an extra token in nextToken

2013-09-08 Thread Michael McCandless (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-5202?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13761264#comment-13761264 ] Michael McCandless commented on LUCENE-5202: bq. There's a call to peekToken

[jira] [Commented] (LUCENE-5202) LookaheadTokenFilter consumes an extra token in nextToken

2013-09-08 Thread Benson Margulies (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-5202?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13761475#comment-13761475 ] Benson Margulies commented on LUCENE-5202: -- OK, I see. So I'll leave it to you

copy/paste typo in solr.cloud.Overseer.getShardNames exception

2013-09-08 Thread Jack Krupansky
In org.apache.solr.cloud.Overseer.getShardNames of branch_4x, the second exception message is an exact copy of the first, but probably should be something like “shards param must specify at least one shard”: static void getShardNames(ListString shardNames, String shards) { if(shards ==null)

[jira] [Commented] (SOLR-4816) Add document routing to CloudSolrServer

2013-09-08 Thread Jack Krupansky (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-4816?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13761489#comment-13761489 ] Jack Krupansky commented on SOLR-4816: -- I was surprised to see that this high priority

[jira] [Commented] (SOLR-5217) CachedSqlEntity fails with stored procedure

2013-09-08 Thread Hardik Upadhyay (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-5217?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13761503#comment-13761503 ] Hardik Upadhyay commented on SOLR-5217: --- Yes,over the iteration on parent entity,

[jira] [Commented] (SOLR-5217) CachedSqlEntity fails with stored procedure

2013-09-08 Thread Hardik Upadhyay (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-5217?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13761505#comment-13761505 ] Hardik Upadhyay commented on SOLR-5217: --- CachedSqlEntityProcessor should take in

A reference to a commercial algorithm in comments - is this all right?

2013-09-08 Thread Dawid Weiss
As part of a recent commit I cleaned up the comments surrounding the clustering extension in the Solr example. As part of this I added comments concerning configuration of clustering algorithms in the Carrot2 framework, but also a helpers that refer to our commercial clustering algorithm Lingo3G.

Re: A reference to a commercial algorithm in comments - is this all right?

2013-09-08 Thread Simon Willnauer
I don't think it's an issue - if it helps users to conclude how to get it I think it's actually an improvement! simon On Sun, Sep 8, 2013 at 8:50 PM, Dawid Weiss dawid.we...@cs.put.poznan.pl wrote: As part of a recent commit I cleaned up the comments surrounding the clustering extension in the

Re: A reference to a commercial algorithm in comments - is this all right?

2013-09-08 Thread Dawid Weiss
I think less configuration there is an improvement :) The problem seems to be that carrot.algorithm can be any clustering component that plugs into the Carrot2 framework -- including our commercial algorithm (I don't think there's anything else besides that). We suck at brand differentiation and

[jira] [Commented] (LUCENE-5123) invert the codec postings API

2013-09-08 Thread Michael McCandless (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-5123?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13761540#comment-13761540 ] Michael McCandless commented on LUCENE-5123: {quote} 1. move write() from

[jira] [Commented] (LUCENE-5202) LookaheadTokenFilter consumes an extra token in nextToken

2013-09-08 Thread Michael McCandless (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-5202?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13761544#comment-13761544 ] Michael McCandless commented on LUCENE-5202: OK I'll commit this fix ...

[jira] [Commented] (LUCENE-5202) LookaheadTokenFilter consumes an extra token in nextToken

2013-09-08 Thread Benson Margulies (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-5202?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13761545#comment-13761545 ] Benson Margulies commented on LUCENE-5202: -- Well, it only took me about 10

[jira] [Commented] (SOLR-4816) Add document routing to CloudSolrServer

2013-09-08 Thread Mark Miller (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-4816?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13761550#comment-13761550 ] Mark Miller commented on SOLR-4816: --- bq. this high priority ... Jira ... is still listed

Re: A reference to a commercial algorithm in comments - is this all right?

2013-09-08 Thread Mark Miller
I see no problem with it. - Mark On Sun, Sep 8, 2013 at 2:50 PM, Dawid Weiss dawid.we...@cs.put.poznan.plwrote: As part of a recent commit I cleaned up the comments surrounding the clustering extension in the Solr example. As part of this I added comments concerning configuration of

[jira] [Created] (SOLR-5221) CloudSolrServer should default to 15 seconds for the zk client timeout, just like Solr core does.

2013-09-08 Thread Mark Miller (JIRA)
Mark Miller created SOLR-5221: - Summary: CloudSolrServer should default to 15 seconds for the zk client timeout, just like Solr core does. Key: SOLR-5221 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-5221

[jira] [Commented] (SOLR-5221) CloudSolrServer should default to 15 seconds for the zk client timeout, just like Solr core does.

2013-09-08 Thread Mark Miller (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-5221?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13761592#comment-13761592 ] Mark Miller commented on SOLR-5221: --- It currently defaults to 10 - the old core default.

[jira] [Commented] (SOLR-4465) Configurable Collectors

2013-09-08 Thread Kranti Parisa (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-4465?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13761604#comment-13761604 ] Kranti Parisa commented on SOLR-4465: - Does any of those tickets support configurable

[jira] [Assigned] (SOLR-5215) Deadlock in Solr Cloud ConnectionManager

2013-09-08 Thread Mark Miller (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-5215?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Mark Miller reassigned SOLR-5215: - Assignee: Mark Miller Deadlock in Solr Cloud ConnectionManager

[jira] [Updated] (SOLR-5215) Deadlock in Solr Cloud ConnectionManager

2013-09-08 Thread Mark Miller (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-5215?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Mark Miller updated SOLR-5215: -- Fix Version/s: 5.0 4.5 Deadlock in Solr Cloud ConnectionManager

[jira] [Comment Edited] (SOLR-4465) Configurable Collectors

2013-09-08 Thread Kranti Parisa (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-4465?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13761604#comment-13761604 ] Kranti Parisa edited comment on SOLR-4465 at 9/9/13 4:27 AM: -

[jira] [Comment Edited] (SOLR-4465) Configurable Collectors

2013-09-08 Thread Kranti Parisa (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-4465?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13761604#comment-13761604 ] Kranti Parisa edited comment on SOLR-4465 at 9/9/13 4:30 AM: -

[jira] [Commented] (SOLR-5006) CREATESHARD command for 'implicit' shards

2013-09-08 Thread Jack Krupansky (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-5006?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13761620#comment-13761620 ] Jack Krupansky commented on SOLR-5006: -- The OverseerCollectionProcessor#createShard

[jira] [Commented] (SOLR-5006) CREATESHARD command for 'implicit' shards

2013-09-08 Thread Noble Paul (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-5006?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13761623#comment-13761623 ] Noble Paul commented on SOLR-5006: -- Yes, It's an omission. Thanks for pointing it out

[jira] [Commented] (SOLR-5006) CREATESHARD command for 'implicit' shards

2013-09-08 Thread Noble Paul (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-5006?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13761625#comment-13761625 ] Noble Paul commented on SOLR-5006: -- Let's open a separate issue for the ref guide