+1 (non-binding)
SUCCESS! [0:57:17.821452]
On Tue, Sep 27, 2022 at 3:32 PM Michael McCandless <
luc...@mikemccandless.com> wrote:
> +1, smoke tester:
>
> SUCCESS! [0:26:01.696388]
>
>
> Mike McCandless
>
> http://blog.mikemccandless.com
>
>
> On Tue, Sep 27, 2022 at 3:45 PM Anshum Gupta
>
+1, smoke tester:
SUCCESS! [0:26:01.696388]
Mike McCandless
http://blog.mikemccandless.com
On Tue, Sep 27, 2022 at 3:45 PM Anshum Gupta wrote:
> +1 (binding)
>
> Smoketester is happy!
> SUCCESS! [0:54:06.589484]
>
> On Tue, Sep 27, 2022 at 6:15 AM Michael Sokolov
> wrote:
>
>> Please vote
+1 (binding)
Smoketester is happy!
SUCCESS! [0:54:06.589484]
On Tue, Sep 27, 2022 at 6:15 AM Michael Sokolov wrote:
> Please vote for release candidate 3 for Lucene 9.4.0
>
> The artifacts can be downloaded from:
>
>
Again: delete the gradle.properties, start gradlew and be happy. No need to
install JDK 19 or set any env var. It just works™.
Eclipse IDE will also work fine (it will hide the classes). Idea is under
investigation. In worst case disable compilation of the problematic
core/src/java19 folder in
the 'gradlew -q javaToolChains' command is useful to see which JVMs
gradle knows about.
On Tue, Sep 27, 2022 at 3:34 PM Uwe Schindler wrote:
>
> You just need to recreate Gradle properties, e.g. by deleting the old file.
>
> If you do not change anything Gradle will just work. On first build it
You just need to recreate Gradle properties, e.g. by deleting the old file.
If you do not change anything Gradle will just work. On first build it will
autoprovision JDK 19 like any other dependency into the Gradle cache like Maven
artifacts and use it to compile the java 19 specific classes.
> If you do not want Gradle to auto-provision the Java 19 for compilation
of those Preview classes, pass environment variable
JAVA19_HOME=/path/to/jdk19 to your build!
That seems inverted; maybe I misunderstand? If say we're working locally
without Java 19 and don't want to bother it during dev,
+1 SUCCESS! [1:13:37.634770]
On Tue, Sep 27, 2022 at 6:44 PM Uwe Schindler wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Policeman Jenkins checked the release candidate 3 (RC3) for me (
> https://jenkins.thetaphi.de/job/Lucene-Release-Tester/22/console):
>
> SUCCESS! [1:42:45.782213]
> Finished: SUCCESS
>
> I also checked
Hi,
Policeman Jenkins checked the release candidate 3 (RC3) for me
(https://jenkins.thetaphi.de/job/Lucene-Release-Tester/22/console):
SUCCESS! [1:42:45.782213]
Finished: SUCCESS
I also checked Luke downloaded from the binary JAR and tested Java 19
support:
* When starting Luke with Java
+1
Smoketester works for me again without hassles, thanks Uwe.
I tested both java 11 and java 17.
SUCCESS! [2:49:13.336252]
P.S. It would be nice option in the future to be able to test other
versions that we have MR-jar'd code for (e.g. 19 in this case).
On Tue, Sep 27, 2022 at 9:15 AM
Thank you Mike, sorry for all the extra work!
On Tue, Sep 27, 2022 at 3:14 PM Michael Sokolov wrote:
> OK, well I am glad we were able to fix quickly.
>
> This vote is failed; I've re-spun RC3 and will start a new vote thread
>
> On Tue, Sep 27, 2022 at 5:52 AM Uwe Schindler wrote:
> >
> > Hi,
Please vote for release candidate 3 for Lucene 9.4.0
The artifacts can be downloaded from:
https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/lucene/lucene-9.4.0-RC3-rev-d2e22e18c6c92b6a6ba0bbc26d78b5e82832f956
You can run the smoke tester directly with this command:
python3 -u
OK, well I am glad we were able to fix quickly.
This vote is failed; I've re-spun RC3 and will start a new vote thread
On Tue, Sep 27, 2022 at 5:52 AM Uwe Schindler wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> I also added the small build system changes and the localSettings fix for
> Smoketester to make Robert happy
Hi,
I also added the small build system changes and the localSettings fix
for Smoketester to make Robert happy with validating release :-)
Uwe
Am 27.09.2022 um 10:59 schrieb Ignacio Vera:
I pushed a fix to all relevant branches:
https://github.com/apache/lucene/pull/11825
On Tue, Sep
I pushed a fix to all relevant branches:
https://github.com/apache/lucene/pull/11825
On Tue, Sep 27, 2022 at 10:44 AM Anshum Gupta
wrote:
> Thanks Ignacio for noticing and reporting that. I agree with Uwe, it makes
> sense to cancel this vote and get the fix in.
>
> Thank you for being
Thanks Ignacio for noticing and reporting that. I agree with Uwe, it makes
sense to cancel this vote and get the fix in.
Thank you for being patient, Mike :)
On Tue, Sep 27, 2022 at 1:20 AM Uwe Schindler wrote:
> Hi,
>
> that's too bad! As not many have ran smoke tester, I think it may be a
>
Hi,
that's too bad! As not many have ran smoke tester, I think it may be a
good idea to now stop the release.
If we respin, I will backport some small build system fixes like support
for Eclipse and Smoketester bootup (regarding MR-JAR) also to the 9.4
branch. But that's not urgent.
Uwe
Hi,
I just noticed an important regression on polygon queries using the
LatLonPoint field, see https://github.com/apache/lucene/issues/11824.
It feels like an important regression so it might be worth a respinning.
Sorry about that.
On Mon, Sep 26, 2022 at 10:30 PM Anshum Gupta
wrote:
> +1
18 matches
Mail list logo
