My bad, when the fix I backported contains JDK17 API and so it can't build
in 9x, I just pushed the fix for it, sorry!
On Fri, Dec 30, 2022 at 5:01 PM Policeman Jenkins Server <
jenk...@thetaphi.de> wrote:
> Build: https://jenkins.thetaphi.de/job/Lucene-9.x-Windows/1677/
> Java: 64bit/jdk-18 -XX:
Hi Patrick,
This is an interesting question, and from what I understood, I see
correctness problems in what you're trying to implement. Let me make sure I
understand correctly...
So indexer-1 created segments 1,2,3,4 and indexer-2 created segments 1',
2', 3', 4' independently (they just have the
Ah, it does indeed. Thank you for the quick fix Patrick!
Cheers,
-Greg
On Fri, Dec 30, 2022 at 10:01 AM Patrick Zhai wrote:
> Seems related to the commit just pushed? I put a quick fix:
> https://github.com/apache/lucene/pull/12049
>
> On Fri, Dec 30, 2022 at 9:35 AM Policeman Jenkins Server <
Hi Robert, got it, thanks!
Hi Uwe, yes we do have a way to detect whether the segment is created by
node A or B even if they share the same name, however, lucene does not
allow such situation (same name but generated by different writer) when
calling `openIfChanged` to try to incrementally load th
Seems related to the commit just pushed? I put a quick fix:
https://github.com/apache/lucene/pull/12049
On Fri, Dec 30, 2022 at 9:35 AM Policeman Jenkins Server <
jenk...@thetaphi.de> wrote:
> Build: https://jenkins.thetaphi.de/job/Lucene-main-Linux/39124/
> Java: 64bit/jdk-17.0.3 -XX:+UseCompres
OK, great! Thanks Marc. I plan on merging the PR today.
Cheers,
-Greg
On Thu, Dec 29, 2022 at 3:23 PM Marc D'Mello wrote:
> Hi Greg,
>
> I'm also OK merging as is since this is a new feature and doesn't affect
> any of the current functionality. I also think there are no glaring issues
> with t
On 3203/12/01 19:23:01 Doug Cutting wrote:
> I don't think this value actually find its way into the results. Rather
> it causes PhraseScorer.score() to exit, as this value is always greater
> than the value of 'end' passed into that method.
>
> Doug
>
> Simon Cozens wrote:
>
> > Plucene is nearly
