[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-8565?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16909145#comment-16909145
]
Itamar Syn-Hershko commented on LUCENE-8565:
Heya - is this waiting for anything
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-8565?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16771783#comment-16771783
]
Itamar Syn-Hershko commented on LUCENE-8565:
I'm not sure what the Lucene versioning policy
Anyone?
--
Itamar Syn-Hershko
CTO, Founder
BigData Boutique <http://bigdataboutique.com/>
Elasticsearch Consulting Partner
Microsoft MVP | Lucene.NET PMC
http://code972.com | @synhershko <https://twitter.com/synhershko>
On Mon, Jan 14, 2019 at 10:19 AM Itamar Syn-Hershko
wrot
it in.
JIRA: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-8565
PR: https://github.com/apache/lucene-solr/pull/498
What do people think?
Cheers,
--
Itamar Syn-Hershko
CTO, Founder
BigData Boutique <http://bigdataboutique.com/>
Elasticsearch Consulting Partner
http://code972.com | @synh
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-8565?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Itamar Syn-Hershko updated LUCENE-8565:
---
Summary: SimpleQueryParser to support field filtering (aka Add field:text
operator
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-8565?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Itamar Syn-Hershko updated LUCENE-8565:
---
Description:
SimpleQueryParser lacks support for the `field:` operator for creating
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-8565?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16686301#comment-16686301
]
Itamar Syn-Hershko commented on LUCENE-8565:
PR submitted on github: [https://github.com
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-8565?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Itamar Syn-Hershko updated LUCENE-8565:
---
Description:
SimpleQueryString lacks support for the `field:` operator for creating
Itamar Syn-Hershko created LUCENE-8565:
--
Summary: SimpleQueryString to support field filtering (aka Add
field:text operator)
Key: LUCENE-8565
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-8565
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-6302?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=14338677#comment-14338677
]
Itamar Syn-Hershko commented on LUCENE-6302:
Sent a PR for the latter https
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-6302?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=14338563#comment-14338563
]
Itamar Syn-Hershko commented on LUCENE-6302:
I actually expected the main
Itamar Syn-Hershko created LUCENE-6302:
--
Summary: Adding Date Math support to Lucene Expressions module
Key: LUCENE-6302
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-6302
Project: Lucene
Thanks guys, we will mimic the current behavior and ignore the comment.
Mike I did promise to find bugs!
--
Itamar Syn-Hershko
http://code972.com | @synhershko https://twitter.com/synhershko
Freelance Developer Consultant
Lucene.NET committer and PMC member
On Wed, Feb 4, 2015 at 11:20 AM, Uwe
Rob, what is the intended behavior, and what is the reasoning behind it?
Doesn't this affect only attempts to open a non-existent index directory -
and whether or not there will be an empty folder left behind?
--
Itamar Syn-Hershko
http://code972.com | @synhershko https://twitter.com/synhershko
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-6103?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=14241214#comment-14241214
]
Itamar Syn-Hershko commented on LUCENE-6103:
Maybe out of scope
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-6103?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=14241306#comment-14241306
]
Itamar Syn-Hershko commented on LUCENE-6103:
Sent them a request. I'll buy
Itamar Syn-Hershko created LUCENE-6103:
--
Summary: StandardTokenizer doesn't tokenizer word:word
Key: LUCENE-6103
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-6103
Project: Lucene - Core
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-6103?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Itamar Syn-Hershko updated LUCENE-6103:
---
Summary: StandardTokenizer doesn't tokenize word:word (was:
StandardTokenizer
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-5997?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=14239697#comment-14239697
]
Itamar Syn-Hershko commented on LUCENE-5997:
Sounds good!
StandardFilter
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-5723?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=14239728#comment-14239728
]
Itamar Syn-Hershko commented on LUCENE-5723:
Reported as https://java.net
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-6103?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=14239784#comment-14239784
]
Itamar Syn-Hershko commented on LUCENE-6103:
Yes, I figured it will be down
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-6103?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=14240090#comment-14240090
]
Itamar Syn-Hershko commented on LUCENE-6103:
Good stuff, thanks Steve. I'm
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-6103?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=14240133#comment-14240133
]
Itamar Syn-Hershko commented on LUCENE-6103:
Ok so I did some homework
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-6103?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=14240392#comment-14240392
]
Itamar Syn-Hershko commented on LUCENE-6103:
0. You mean it implements UAX#29
layer or
otherwise. I'll be happy to take this on but every approach I'm looking at
currently has some significant flaws.
Cheers,
[1] http://sourceforge.net/p/jflex/mailman/jflex-users/?viewmonth=201411
--
Itamar Syn-Hershko
http://code972.com | @synhershko https://twitter.com/synhershko
Itamar Syn-Hershko created LUCENE-5997:
--
Summary: StandardFilter redundant
Key: LUCENE-5997
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-5997
Project: Lucene - Core
Issue Type: Bug
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-4601?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=14035885#comment-14035885
]
Itamar Syn-Hershko commented on LUCENE-4601:
May not be directly related
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2841?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=14035978#comment-14035978
]
Itamar Syn-Hershko commented on LUCENE-2841:
Can anyone review and comment
Itamar Syn-Hershko created LUCENE-5723:
--
Summary: Performance improvements for FastCharStream
Key: LUCENE-5723
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-5723
Project: Lucene - Core
This makes sense, thanks Rob
--
Itamar Syn-Hershko
http://code972.com | @synhershko https://twitter.com/synhershko
Freelance Developer Consultant
Author of RavenDB in Action http://manning.com/synhershko/
On Sun, Mar 2, 2014 at 3:54 PM, Robert Muir rcm...@gmail.com wrote:
I use it too, its
withdrawn (
http://www.unicode.org/reports/tr30/).
I'm not up-to-date with the greatest and latest in the Unicode world so I'm
not sure why it was withdrawn, but given the delicacy of term normalization
I suppose this worth revisiting?
Thanks,
--
Itamar Syn-Hershko
http://code972.com
Itamar Syn-Hershko created LUCENE-5358:
--
Summary: Code cleanup on KStemmer
Key: LUCENE-5358
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-5358
Project: Lucene - Core
Issue Type
Itamar Syn-Hershko created LUCENE-5011:
--
Summary: MemoryIndex and FVH don't play along with multi-value
fields
Key: LUCENE-5011
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-5011
Project
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-5011?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13662950#comment-13662950
]
Itamar Syn-Hershko commented on LUCENE-5011:
The actual test case we have now
Itamar Syn-Hershko created LUCENE-4673:
--
Summary: TermQuery.toString() doesn't play nicely with whitespace
Key: LUCENE-4673
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-4673
Project: Lucene
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-4673?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13548874#comment-13548874
]
Itamar Syn-Hershko commented on LUCENE-4673:
I figured as much, yet we would
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2841?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13539310#comment-13539310
]
Itamar Syn-Hershko commented on LUCENE-2841:
Attached is a patch to fix
In the past git had bad tooling, that is not the case today. I've been
using git also without github screens - and while they definitely add a
lot, it is still ten times more usable than SVN.
As I told the Lucene.NET mailing list, you should all watch the following
video and give git a few days
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-4208?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13451430#comment-13451430
]
Itamar Syn-Hershko commented on LUCENE-4208:
What's the status
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-4186?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13447037#comment-13447037
]
Itamar Syn-Hershko commented on LUCENE-4186:
distErrPct makes sense to me
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-4342?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13445807#comment-13445807
]
Itamar Syn-Hershko commented on LUCENE-4342:
I can confirm this is fixed now
Itamar Syn-Hershko created LUCENE-4342:
--
Summary: Issues with prefix tree's Distance Error Percentage
Key: LUCENE-4342
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-4342
Project: Lucene
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-4342?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Itamar Syn-Hershko updated LUCENE-4342:
---
Attachment: unnamed.patch
A failing test
Issues with prefix
This will probably require releasing the core again as well as a new RC...
The spatial module was updated, still doing some integration tests, will
send more updates soon
On Tue, Aug 21, 2012 at 1:14 AM, synhers...@apache.org wrote:
Author: synhershko
Date: Mon Aug 20 22:14:01 2012
New
.
On Tue, Aug 21, 2012 at 1:19 AM, Itamar Syn-Hershko ita...@code972.com
wrote:
This will probably require releasing the core again as well as a new
RC...
The spatial module was updated, still doing some integration tests, will
send more updates soon
On Tue, Aug 21, 2012 at 1:14 AM
Nowadays git works just great for Windows, and it's much easier to work
with than Hg
On Wed, Aug 1, 2012 at 9:41 PM, Zachary Gramana zgram...@feature23.comwrote:
On Aug 1, 2012, at 12:51 PM, Itamar Syn-Hershko wrote:
And for heaven's sake, can we move to git when graduating?
Given
that they are
willing to post somewhere, I would be glad to use it.
- Zack
On Jul 27, 2012, at 12:00 PM, Itamar Syn-Hershko wrote:
The cleanup consists mainly of going file by file with ReSharper and
trying
to get them as green as possible. Making a lot of fields readonly,
removing
unused
and see where it landed. It's probably a good idea for us
to build rules though.
- Zack
On Jul 27, 2012, at 12:00 PM, Itamar Syn-Hershko wrote:
The cleanup consists mainly of going file by file with ReSharper and
trying
to get them as green as possible. Making a lot of fields readonly
Yes, with the due release. I, for once, always mistake one for another.
On Wed, Aug 1, 2012 at 4:09 AM, Prescott Nasser geobmx...@hotmail.comwrote:
There are two packages Lucene packages on nuget that are depreciated. With
some updates nuget made a while ago, we have the ability to remove
be ready as it is.
I am eager to start working on porting 3.6.
Thanks,
Christopher
On Wed, Aug 1, 2012 at 9:14 AM, Itamar Syn-Hershko ita...@code972.com
wrote:
I still have plenty to go on, but on a second thought we could do
that
work
just the same when we work
forward with the project.
Thoughts either way on this?
On Wed, Aug 1, 2012 at 9:31 AM, Itamar Syn-Hershko ita...@code972.com
wrote:
I agree
What about the spatial stuff? you guys want to wait for it?
On Wed, Aug 1, 2012 at 7:19 PM, Christopher Currens
currens.ch...@gmail.com
1, 2012 at 9:31 AM, Itamar Syn-Hershko ita...@code972.com
wrote:
I agree
What about the spatial stuff? you guys want to wait for it?
On Wed, Aug 1, 2012 at 7:19 PM, Christopher Currens
currens.ch...@gmail.com
wrote:
I think that while it would be nice to get it done
way, I think we just might be ready as it is.
I am eager to start working on porting 3.6.
Thanks,
Christopher
On Wed, Aug 1, 2012 at 9:14 AM, Itamar Syn-Hershko ita...@code972.com
wrote:
I still have plenty to go on, but on a second thought we could do that
work
just the same when
done.
Thanks,
Christopher
On Fri, Jul 27, 2012 at 9:00 AM, Itamar Syn-Hershko ita...@code972.com
wrote:
The cleanup consists mainly of going file by file with ReSharper and
trying
to get them as green as possible. Making a lot of fields readonly,
removing
unused vars and stuff like
.
On 2012-07-08 20:44, Itamar Syn-Hershko wrote:
What's the status on the failing tests we had?
On Sun, Jul 8, 2012 at 9:02 PM, Prescott Nasser
geobmx...@hotmail.com
wrote:
Three issues left that I see
What's the status on the failing tests we had?
On Sun, Jul 8, 2012 at 9:02 PM, Prescott Nasser geobmx...@hotmail.comwrote:
Three issues left that I see:
Fixing the build output, I did some work, but I'm good on this, we can
move the rest of work to 3.6
+1 for graduation
I still think graduation should be in sync with the 3.0.3 release and a
press release on work towards 3.6 and 4.0 releases.
On Sun, Jul 8, 2012 at 8:44 PM, Prescott Nasser geobmx...@hotmail.comwrote:
Hey All,
This is the first step for graduation for the Apache Lucene.Net
Why 3.5 and not 3.6?
In my opinion we should skip all versions in between 3.0.3 and 3.6, and
just port 3.6 after we released 3.0.3. Lucene 4 will probably be released
by the time we are done, and then we could move on to porting it.
On Sat, Jun 23, 2012 at 9:35 AM, pnas...@apache.org wrote:
To add to this - Lucene 4x is still being worked on in the Java front. We
rather put efforts on porting v3.6 and start on v4 once there is an
official Java release
Thanks for your efforts!
On Wed, Jun 20, 2012 at 6:19 PM, Prescott Nasser geobmx...@hotmail.comwrote:
How much are you trying to
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENENET-495?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13393629#comment-13393629
]
Itamar Syn-Hershko commented on LUCENENET-495:
--
1. IMO
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENENET-495?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13393633#comment-13393633
]
Itamar Syn-Hershko commented on LUCENENET-495:
--
Makes sense
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENENET-495?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13393363#comment-13393363
]
Itamar Syn-Hershko commented on LUCENENET-495:
--
+1
Take a look
+1 for releasing after graduation, then
With some careful PR and our sponsorship offer, we can get the project
flying
There's still some work to do anyway
On Fri, Jun 15, 2012 at 1:59 PM, Stefan Bodewig bode...@apache.org wrote:
On 2012-06-14, Christopher Currens wrote:
I've gone back and
Where do we stand with this?
I want to push to a 3.0.3 release, what items are still pending?
Itamar.
IMHO, whatever brings more attention to the project, and I'm not sure
graduation is what this project needs right now. In the end it's just
semantics.
I'd focus those efforts on getting more work done and having more frequent
releases. Hence our proposition to sponsor dev, which still stands.
On
Ok, and is the code in 100% compliance with the 3.0.3 Java code?
I'll be spending some time on fixing the index corruption issue, and it is
probably best for Chris to wrap up the work he has started
Anyone else on board to close some tickets?
On Thu, Jun 14, 2012 at 6:19 PM, Prescott Nasser
is empty. Add
it in, and I get 755 files in the index after it crashes.
Thanks,
Christopher
On Wed, Jun 13, 2012 at 6:13 PM, Itamar Syn-Hershko ita...@code972.com
wrote:
Yes, reproduced in first try. See attached program - I referenced it to
current trunk.
On Thu, Jun 14, 2012 at 3
Sorry, misread your question
This can be easily done with xUnit, using Theories.
On Thu, Jun 14, 2012 at 9:26 PM, Itamar Syn-Hershko ita...@code972.comwrote:
Something like:
Thread.CurrentThread.CurrentCulture = cultureInfo;
Thread.CurrentThread.CurrentUICulture = cultureInfo;
And setting
is definitely expected, but
it's not expected to see segments_N files unless you pass
autoCommit=true.
Mike McCandless
http://blog.mikemccandless.com
On Thu, Jun 14, 2012 at 8:14 PM, Itamar Syn-Hershko ita...@code972.com
wrote:
Not what I'm seeing. I actually see a lot of segments created
is empty. Add
it in, and I get 755 files in the index after it crashes.
Thanks,
Christopher
On Wed, Jun 13, 2012 at 6:13 PM, Itamar Syn-Hershko ita...@code972.com
wrote:
Yes, reproduced in first try. See attached program - I referenced it to
current trunk.
On Thu, Jun 14, 2012 at 3
index, add a bunch of docs, and things crash
before you have a chance to commit, then there is no index (not even a
0 doc one) in that directory.
Mike McCandless
http://blog.mikemccandless.com
On Thu, Jun 14, 2012 at 1:41 PM, Itamar Syn-Hershko ita...@code972.com
wrote:
I'm quite certain
is definitely expected, but
it's not expected to see segments_N files unless you pass
autoCommit=true.
Mike McCandless
http://blog.mikemccandless.com
On Thu, Jun 14, 2012 at 8:14 PM, Itamar Syn-Hershko ita...@code972.com
wrote:
Not what I'm seeing. I actually see a lot of segments created
files on commit)? Those are very important for
an index to be intact after OS/JVM crash or power loss.
More responses below:
On Tue, Jun 12, 2012 at 8:20 PM, Itamar Syn-Hershko ita...@code972.com
wrote:
I'm a Lucene.Net committer, and there is a chance we have a bug in our
Hi Java devs,
I'm a Lucene.Net committer, and there is a chance we have a bug in our
FSDirectory implementation that causes indexes to get corrupted when
indexing is cut while the IW is still open. As it roots from some
retroactive fixes you made, I'd appreciate your feedback.
Correct me if I'm
Mike,
On Wed, Jun 13, 2012 at 7:31 PM, Michael McCandless
luc...@mikemccandless.com wrote:
Hi Itamar,
One quick question: does Lucene.Net include the fixes done for
LUCENE-1044 (to fsync files on commit)? Those are very important for
an index to be intact after OS/JVM crash or power loss.
files on commit)? Those are very important for
an index to be intact after OS/JVM crash or power loss.
More responses below:
On Tue, Jun 12, 2012 at 8:20 PM, Itamar Syn-Hershko ita...@code972.com
wrote:
I'm a Lucene.Net committer, and there is a chance we have a bug in our
Yes, reproduced in first try. See attached program - I referenced it to
current trunk.
On Thu, Jun 14, 2012 at 3:54 AM, Itamar Syn-Hershko ita...@code972.comwrote:
Christopher,
I used the IndexBuilder app from here
https://github.com/synhershko/Talks/tree/master/LuceneNeatThings
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENENET-438?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13293983#comment-13293983
]
Itamar Syn-Hershko commented on LUCENENET-438:
--
This should be made
Hi devs,
We are looking to sponsor porting work, to help with keeping up the pace of
development and help Lucene.Net be closer to Java Lucene. Unfortunately the
amount of work I can put on this is very limited, and being up to speed
with Lucene is important to us, hence the idea to offer
Yes, seems like all of them. Will look into it.
On Sat, Jun 2, 2012 at 9:25 PM, Stefan Bodewig bode...@apache.org wrote:
On 2012-06-02, Itamar Syn-Hershko wrote:
I'm using git-svn, with auto-crlf set to true
I'm not familiar enough with git-svn. auto-crlf will cover the git side
but I
I was finally able to get git and svn talk to one another, and pushed my
recent changes into trunk.
The new Spatial contrib is bearing the non-standard version of 2.9.9, on
purpose. It also contains Spatial4n in a binary form, mimicking the way it
works in Java Lucene.
The few tests that present
Welcome!
On Thu, May 24, 2012 at 9:40 PM, Digy digyd...@gmail.com wrote:
Welcome Simon
DIGY
-Original Message-
From: Prescott Nasser [mailto:geobmx...@hotmail.com]
Sent: Thursday, May 24, 2012 10:06 AM
To: lucene-net-dev@lucene.apache.org; lucene-net-u...@lucene.apache.org
Thanks guys
On Wed, May 23, 2012 at 1:14 AM, zoolette gaufre...@gmail.com wrote:
Welcome in Itamar !
2012/5/22 Prescott Nasser geobmx...@hotmail.com
Hey all,
I'd like to officially welcome Itamar as a new committer. I know the
community appreciates the work you've been doing with the
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENENET-483?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13280126#comment-13280126
]
Itamar Syn-Hershko commented on LUCENENET-483:
--
That's not the newest
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENENET-483?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13280266#comment-13280266
]
Itamar Syn-Hershko commented on LUCENENET-483:
--
This code isn't mine
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENENET-483?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13280552#comment-13280552
]
Itamar Syn-Hershko commented on LUCENENET-483:
--
Great.
I updated
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENENET-462?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13279642#comment-13279642
]
Itamar Syn-Hershko commented on LUCENENET-462:
--
This is now fixed
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENENET-483?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13279643#comment-13279643
]
Itamar Syn-Hershko commented on LUCENENET-483:
--
This should be fixed
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-3304?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13279609#comment-13279609
]
Itamar Syn-Hershko commented on SOLR-3304:
--
In continuation to the discussion
. As before, any help
will
be appreciated.
Itamar.
On Thu, Apr 26, 2012 at 6:45 PM, Itamar Syn-Hershko
ita...@code972.comwrote:
Hi again,
I completed the port of the external Spatial library, and now am
moving to
porting the Lucene integration.
The library
ICLA signed and sent
On Mon, Apr 30, 2012 at 11:27 AM, Stefan Bodewig bode...@apache.org wrote:
On 2012-04-28, Itamar Syn-Hershko wrote:
That mail from Stephan got lost in my inbox, so I never followed up on
that. I guess now would be a good chance to tie up all loose ends.
How do I do
No, but let me know what do I need to do.
On Sat, Apr 28, 2012 at 1:20 AM, Prescott Nasser geobmx...@hotmail.comwrote:
Itamar, have you filed an ICLA? If so we are good to go on this, and I'll
put this in place of the current spatial code in contrib
From: geobmx...@hotmail.com
To:
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENENET-484?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13264399#comment-13264399
]
Itamar Syn-Hershko commented on LUCENENET-484:
--
That's probably a matter
Hi again,
I completed the port of the external Spatial library, and now am moving to
porting the Lucene integration.
The library, Spatial4n, is under ASL2 and can be found here
https://github.com/synhershko/Spatial4n
Anyone who can chip in and help port the tests, that would greatly help.
There
Hi again,
I completed the port of the external Spatial library, and now am moving to
porting the Lucene integration.
The library, Spatial4n, is under ASL2 and can be found here
https://github.com/synhershko/Spatial4n
Anyone who can chip in and help port the tests, that would greatly help.
There
to divide work between other committers, we can arrange that, and create
issues for it, that is, if the other committers don't object to this.
On Tue, Apr 24, 2012 at 1:45 PM, Itamar Syn-Hershko ita...@code972.com
wrote:
Thanks for your reply.
Aside from the original port which had many
If it is known to be stable for actual use, we RavenDB dev team will update
to it in a branch and provide feedback. A -Pre nuget package released for
every RC can definitely help here.
On Tue, Apr 24, 2012 at 5:25 PM, Michael Herndon
mhern...@wickedsoftware.net wrote:
Do you all think we're at
contrib bug fixing
From: ita...@code972.com
To: lucene-net-...@lucene.apache.org
One more thing - what's the deal with ChainedFilter? I can see a commit
by
DIGY on 7/7/2011 but it seems to have been removed since?
On Mon, Apr 23, 2012 at 11:06 AM, Itamar Syn-Hershko
ita
Thanks for your reply.
Aside from the original port which had many divergences from java, the
only other issue applied to spatial is LUCENENET-431, which would be easy
to include.
That is not correct. LUCENENET-431 was committed, but some fixed from Java
Lucene 3.0.3 are in as well. The
For starters - CartesianPolyFilterBuilder.GetBoxShape() is not an exact
port - do you remember why?
Anyway, if it was never fully ported as you say maybe I'll just go ahead
and complete that
For your reference, here are 2 failing tests which pass in Java Lucene (can
send the java file) -
1 - 100 of 156 matches
Mail list logo
