Issue with Atomic update on boolean fields

2022-08-29 Thread Rahul Goswami
Hello, I submitted the below JIRA after discussing the issue on the user list. https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-16360 I have tried the fix locally and it's working as per expectations. I would like to contribute it as well. Since this will be my first time contributing to the open

Re: Lucene (unexpected ) fsync on existing segments

2021-03-27 Thread Rahul Goswami
Hello, Opened the below JIRA for this issue. I will work on this and try to submit a patch. [LUCENE-9889] Lucene (unexpected ) fsync on existing segments - ASF JIRA (apache.org) <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-9889> Thanks, Rahul On Fri, Mar 26, 2021 at 9:56 AM Rahul Goswami

Re: Lucene (unexpected ) fsync on existing segments

2021-03-26 Thread Rahul Goswami
up when using MMapDirectory) sounds different > from the "Lucene fsyncs files that it doesn't need to" bug, right? > > Mike McCandless > > http://blog.mikemccandless.com > > > On Mon, Mar 15, 2021 at 4:28 PM Rahul Goswami > wrote: > >> Uwe, >>

Re: Lucene (unexpected ) fsync on existing segments

2021-03-15 Thread Rahul Goswami
gt; Please read the blog post: > https://blog.thetaphi.de/2012/07/use-lucenes-mmapdirectory-on-64bit.html > > Uwe > > Am March 15, 2021 7:43:29 PM UTC schrieb Rahul Goswami < > rahul196...@gmail.com>: >> >> Mike, >> Yes I am using a 64 bit JVM on Windo

Re: Lucene (unexpected ) fsync on existing segments

2021-03-15 Thread Rahul Goswami
avior should be the same. > > Mike McCandless > > http://blog.mikemccandless.com > > > On Fri, Mar 12, 2021 at 1:46 PM Rahul Goswami > wrote: > >> Thanks Michael. For your question...yes I am running Solr on Windows and >> running it with SimpleFSDirectoryFactory (primar

Re: Lucene (unexpected ) fsync on existing segments

2021-03-12 Thread Rahul Goswami
awesome if you were able to >> create such a thing. >> >> On Fri, Mar 12, 2021 at 9:00 AM Michael Sokolov >> wrote: >> > >> > Yes, please go ahead and open an issue. TBH I'm not sure why this is >> > happening - there may be a good reason?? But l

Re: Lucene (unexpected ) fsync on existing segments

2021-03-11 Thread Rahul Goswami
gt; On Thu, Mar 11, 2021 at 2:52 PM Rahul Goswami > wrote: > > > > Thanks Michael. I thought since this discussion is closer to the code > than most discussions on the solr-users list, it seemed like a more > appropriate forum. Will be mindful going forward. > > On y

Re: Lucene (unexpected ) fsync on existing segments

2021-03-11 Thread Rahul Goswami
in > IndexWriter.startCommit and SegmentInfos.files. Caveat: (1) I'm > looking at this code for the first time, and (2) things may have been > different in 7.7.2? Sorry I don't know for sure, but are you sure that > your backup process is not attempting to copy one of the new files? > >

Re: Lucene (unexpected ) fsync on existing segments

2021-03-11 Thread Rahul Goswami
Hello, Just wanted to follow up one more time to see if this is the right form for my question? Or is this suitable for some other mailing list? Best, Rahul On Sat, Mar 6, 2021 at 3:57 PM Rahul Goswami wrote: > Hello everyone, > Following up on my question in case anyone has any idea. Wh

Re: Lucene (unexpected ) fsync on existing segments

2021-03-06 Thread Rahul Goswami
segment files in a saved commit point DOES have an effect, it might render the backed up index in a corrupt state. Thanks, Rahul On Fri, Mar 5, 2021 at 3:04 PM Rahul Goswami wrote: > Hello, > We have a process which backs up the index (Solr 7.7.2) on a schedule. The > way we do it is we f

Lucene (unexpected ) fsync on existing segments

2021-03-05 Thread Rahul Goswami
Hello, We have a process which backs up the index (Solr 7.7.2) on a schedule. The way we do it is we first save a commit point on the index and then using Solr's /replication handler, get the list of files in that generation. After the backup completes, we release the commit point (Please note

Re: SOLR: Why do we have a CHANGES.txt/md to maintain?

2020-12-02 Thread Rahul Goswami
Couldn't help pitching in here and making a humble request. The CHANGES.txt has been of immense help for us for determining the right upgrade version for our production deployments. So CHANGES.txt or no CHANGES.txt, I hope we'll retain a mechanism to clearly be able to track the changes in

[jira] [Commented] (SOLR-12550) ConcurrentUpdateSolrClient doesn't respect timeouts for commits and optimize

2019-06-24 Thread Rahul Goswami (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-12550?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16870859#comment-16870859 ] Rahul Goswami commented on SOLR-12550: -- As discussed on the Solr user list, I found this issue

[jira] [Updated] (SOLR-13217) collapse parser with /export request handler throws NPE

2019-02-04 Thread Rahul Goswami (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-13217?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Rahul Goswami updated SOLR-13217: - Description: A NullPointerException is thrown when trying to use the /export handler

[jira] [Updated] (SOLR-13217) collapse parser with /export request handler throws NPE

2019-02-04 Thread Rahul Goswami (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-13217?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Rahul Goswami updated SOLR-13217: - Description: A NullPointerException is thrown when trying to use the /export handler

[jira] [Created] (SOLR-13217) collapse parser with /export request handler throws NPE

2019-02-04 Thread Rahul Goswami (JIRA)
Rahul Goswami created SOLR-13217: Summary: collapse parser with /export request handler throws NPE Key: SOLR-13217 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-13217 Project: Solr Issue

[jira] [Comment Edited] (SOLR-8291) NPE calling export handler when useFilterForSortedQuery=true

2019-01-17 Thread Rahul Goswami (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-8291?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16744483#comment-16744483 ] Rahul Goswami edited comment on SOLR-8291 at 1/17/19 9:44 PM: -- Facing

[jira] [Comment Edited] (SOLR-8291) NPE calling export handler when useFilterForSortedQuery=true

2019-01-17 Thread Rahul Goswami (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-8291?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16744483#comment-16744483 ] Rahul Goswami edited comment on SOLR-8291 at 1/17/19 9:42 PM: -- Facing

[jira] [Comment Edited] (SOLR-8291) NPE calling export handler when useFilterForSortedQuery=true

2019-01-17 Thread Rahul Goswami (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-8291?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16744483#comment-16744483 ] Rahul Goswami edited comment on SOLR-8291 at 1/17/19 9:36 PM: -- Facing

[jira] [Commented] (SOLR-8291) NPE calling export handler when useFilterForSortedQuery=true

2019-01-16 Thread Rahul Goswami (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-8291?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16744483#comment-16744483 ] Rahul Goswami commented on SOLR-8291: - Facing the same issue on 7.2.1 while using /export handler