[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-8609?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16721587#comment-16721587
]
Simon Willnauer commented on LUCENE-8609:
-
[~mikemccand] [~jpountz] [~dnhatn] I pushed new
Simon Willnauer created LUCENE-8609:
---
Summary: Allow getting consistent docstats from IndexWriter
Key: LUCENE-8609
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-8609
Project: Lucene - Core
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-8609?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16720279#comment-16720279
]
Simon Willnauer commented on LUCENE-8609:
-
one question here is if we should deprecate
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-8608?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Simon Willnauer resolved LUCENE-8608.
-
Resolution: Fixed
> Extract utility class to iterate over terms d
Simon Willnauer created LUCENE-8608:
---
Summary: Extract utility class to iterate over terms docs
Key: LUCENE-8608
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-8608
Project: Lucene - Core
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-8600?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16718992#comment-16718992
]
Simon Willnauer commented on LUCENE-8600:
-
to be honest I am not very much concerned about
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-8602?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Simon Willnauer resolved LUCENE-8602.
-
Resolution: Fixed
> Share TermsEnum if possible while applying DV upda
Simon Willnauer created LUCENE-8602:
---
Summary: Share TermsEnum if possible while applying DV updates
Key: LUCENE-8602
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-8602
Project: Lucene - Core
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-8599?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Simon Willnauer resolved LUCENE-8599.
-
Resolution: Fixed
> Use sparse bitset to store docs in SingleValueDocValuesFieldUpda
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-8598?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Simon Willnauer resolved LUCENE-8598.
-
Resolution: Fixed
> Improve field updates packed val
Simon Willnauer created LUCENE-8599:
---
Summary: Use sparse bitset to store docs in
SingleValueDocValuesFieldUpdates
Key: LUCENE-8599
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-8599
Project
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-8598?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16714051#comment-16714051
]
Simon Willnauer commented on LUCENE-8598:
-
I ran a benchmark to update 1 values on a single
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-8598?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16714051#comment-16714051
]
Simon Willnauer edited comment on LUCENE-8598 at 12/9/18 6:28 PM:
--
I
Simon Willnauer created LUCENE-8598:
---
Summary: Improve field updates packed values
Key: LUCENE-8598
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-8598
Project: Lucene - Core
Issue Type
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-8598?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Simon Willnauer updated LUCENE-8598:
Description:
DocValuesFieldUpdats are using compact settings for packet ints that causes
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-8592?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Simon Willnauer updated LUCENE-8592:
Affects Version/s: master (8.0)
7.5
Priority: Blocker
Nick, nobody wants to be the one asking for a respin but I think this
bug here [1] is pretty terrible and we should do another round once
it's resolved and backported. @jim / @mike what do you think?
[1] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-8592
On Fri, Dec 7, 2018 at 5:29 PM Nicholas
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-8592?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16712870#comment-16712870
]
Simon Willnauer commented on LUCENE-8592:
-
the patch looks good to me. Yet, I am not 100% on top
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-8595?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Simon Willnauer resolved LUCENE-8595.
-
Resolution: Fixed
Fix Version/s: 7.7
master (8.0
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-8595?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16712005#comment-16712005
]
Simon Willnauer commented on LUCENE-8595:
-
[~jpountz] I think the patch is not enough. I
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-8595?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16711968#comment-16711968
]
Simon Willnauer commented on LUCENE-8595:
-
++ to the patch. This makes sense. would be great
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-8594?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Simon Willnauer resolved LUCENE-8594.
-
Resolution: Fixed
Fix Version/s: master (8.0)
> DV update are broken for upda
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-8594?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Simon Willnauer updated LUCENE-8594:
Affects Version/s: (was: 7.7)
> DV update are broken for updates on new fi
Simon Willnauer created LUCENE-8594:
---
Summary: DV update are broken for updates on new field
Key: LUCENE-8594
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-8594
Project: Lucene - Core
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-8594?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Simon Willnauer updated LUCENE-8594:
Issue Type: Bug (was: Improvement)
> DV update are broken for updates on new fi
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-8593?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Simon Willnauer resolved LUCENE-8593.
-
Resolution: Fixed
> Specialize single value numeric DV upda
Simon Willnauer created LUCENE-8593:
---
Summary: Specialize single value numeric DV updates
Key: LUCENE-8593
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-8593
Project: Lucene - Core
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-8590?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16710326#comment-16710326
]
Simon Willnauer commented on LUCENE-8590:
-
copying this from the PullRequest for reference:
I
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-8590?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16710320#comment-16710320
]
Simon Willnauer commented on LUCENE-8590:
-
all reviews are done on the attached pull-request
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-8590?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Simon Willnauer resolved LUCENE-8590.
-
Resolution: Fixed
Assignee: Simon Willnauer
Fix Version/s: (was: 7.6
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-8590?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16709017#comment-16709017
]
Simon Willnauer commented on LUCENE-8590:
-
[~mikemccand] [~shaie] FYI
> Optimize DocVal
Simon Willnauer created LUCENE-8590:
---
Summary: Optimize DocValues update datastructures
Key: LUCENE-8590
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-8590
Project: Lucene - Core
Issue
folks,
I just want to ask if this is an issue or not but this branch is
associated with a blocker issue for 8.0. If it doesn't have an owner
or is actively worked on do we still consider it a blocker? I mean
don't get me wrong but if this is something that we don't dedicate
time and committer to
I don't know what the state of the tests is for solr. I'm also not on top
of your work so please correct me if I am wrong. You are saying you won't
have enough time for the feature in the near future but you want to merge
it still to master so others can chime in? I don't think this is an
approach
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-8569?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Simon Willnauer resolved LUCENE-8569.
-
Resolution: Fixed
Fix Version/s: 7.7
master (8.0)
> Ne
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-8571?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Simon Willnauer resolved LUCENE-8571.
-
Resolution: Fixed
Fix Version/s: 7.7
master (8.0)
> Do
Simon Willnauer created LUCENE-8571:
---
Summary: Don't block on FrozenBufferedUpdates#apply during
IW#processEvents
Key: LUCENE-8571
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-8571
Project
Simon Willnauer created LUCENE-8569:
---
Summary: Never count soft-deletes if reader has no hard-deletes
Key: LUCENE-8569
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-8569
Project: Lucene - Core
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-8558?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Simon Willnauer reassigned LUCENE-8558:
---
Resolution: Fixed
Assignee: Simon Willnauer
Fix Version/s
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-8558?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16677401#comment-16677401
]
Simon Willnauer commented on LUCENE-8558:
-
patch LGTM
> Adding NumericDocValuesFie
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-8558?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16675363#comment-16675363
]
Simon Willnauer commented on LUCENE-8558:
-
> +1, that's a nice improvement. Very stra
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-7075?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16655195#comment-16655195
]
Simon Willnauer commented on LUCENE-7075:
-
+1 to resolve
> Clean up LegacyNumericUtils us
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-8535?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Simon Willnauer resolved LUCENE-8535.
-
Resolution: Fixed
Fix Version/s: master (8.0)
> Should we drop supp
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-8535?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16654847#comment-16654847
]
Simon Willnauer commented on LUCENE-8535:
-
[~jim.ferenczi] I referenced a github PR
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-8535?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16654039#comment-16654039
]
Simon Willnauer commented on LUCENE-8535:
-
[~jtibshirani] thanks for providing context
Simon Willnauer created LUCENE-8535:
---
Summary: Should we drop support for highlighting block-join queris
Key: LUCENE-8535
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-8535
Project: Lucene
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-6572?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16653864#comment-16653864
]
Simon Willnauer commented on LUCENE-6572:
-
ok folks, think this particular issue is fixed. I
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-6572?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Simon Willnauer resolved LUCENE-6572.
-
Resolution: Fixed
Fix Version/s: master (8.0)
> Highlighter depends on analyz
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-6572?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16653283#comment-16653283
]
Simon Willnauer commented on LUCENE-6572:
-
seems like related to https://issues.apache.org/jira
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-6572?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16653281#comment-16653281
]
Simon Willnauer commented on LUCENE-6572:
-
> Another solution would be to remove the supp
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-6572?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16653188#comment-16653188
]
Simon Willnauer commented on LUCENE-6572:
-
> I also don't understand why it depends on join.
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-6572?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16653176#comment-16653176
]
Simon Willnauer commented on LUCENE-6572:
-
I attached an updated patch for this to remove
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-6572?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Simon Willnauer updated LUCENE-6572:
Attachment: LUCENE-6572.patch
> Highlighter depends on analyzers-com
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-6572?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Simon Willnauer updated LUCENE-6572:
Attachment: LUCENE-8317.patch
> Highlighter depends on analyzers-com
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-6572?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Simon Willnauer updated LUCENE-6572:
Attachment: (was: LUCENE-8317.patch)
> Highlighter depends on analyzers-com
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-6572?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Simon Willnauer reassigned LUCENE-6572:
---
Assignee: Simon Willnauer
> Highlighter depends on analyzers-com
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-8484?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16620291#comment-16620291
]
Simon Willnauer commented on LUCENE-8484:
-
[~dnhatn] LGTM
> Drop fully deleted rea
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-8503?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Simon Willnauer resolved LUCENE-8503.
-
Resolution: Fixed
Fix Version/s: (was: 7.6)
7.5
LUCENE-8502 is in and backported
On Mon, Sep 17, 2018 at 2:14 PM jim ferenczi wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Andrzej, there is another issue in the queue (LUCENE-8502) so I'll wait
> one more day to build the first RC., please backport the fix for the JMX
> beans. Cassandra, I backported the Tika version
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-8503?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16617332#comment-16617332
]
Simon Willnauer commented on LUCENE-8503:
-
I have to revert my statement. I was under
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-8503?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16617309#comment-16617309
]
Simon Willnauer commented on LUCENE-8503:
-
The reality is that unwrapping happens all over
Simon Willnauer created LUCENE-8503:
---
Summary: Simplify unwrapping Filter*Reader
Key: LUCENE-8503
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-8503
Project: Lucene - Core
Issue Type
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-8502?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Simon Willnauer resolved LUCENE-8502.
-
Resolution: Fixed
Fix Version/s: (was: 7.5)
7.6
Simon Willnauer created LUCENE-8502:
---
Summary: Allow access to delegate in FilterCodecReader
Key: LUCENE-8502
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-8502
Project: Lucene - Core
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-8342?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Simon Willnauer resolved LUCENE-8342.
-
Resolution: Fixed
Fix Version/s: master (8.0)
7.5
> Can
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-8484?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Simon Willnauer updated LUCENE-8484:
Summary: Drop fully deleted reader in SubReaderWrapper (was: Allow
SubReaderWrapper
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-8484?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Simon Willnauer updated LUCENE-8484:
Description:
Today we can only wrap readers in SubReaderWrapper but never filter them out
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-8484?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16603087#comment-16603087
]
Simon Willnauer commented on LUCENE-8484:
-
{quote}What happens when a segment gets removed
Simon Willnauer created LUCENE-8484:
---
Summary: Allow SubReaderWrapper to filter out entire readers
Key: LUCENE-8484
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-8484
Project: Lucene - Core
++
> On 31. Aug 2018, at 17:55, David Smiley (JIRA) wrote:
>
>
>[
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-8267?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16598935#comment-16598935
> ]
>
> David Smiley commented on LUCENE-8267:
>
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-8267?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16597436#comment-16597436
]
Simon Willnauer commented on LUCENE-8267:
-
I personally don't think we should put FST50
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-8267?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16597151#comment-16597151
]
Simon Willnauer commented on LUCENE-8267:
-
+1 to use defaults as well.
> Remove memory cod
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-8471?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16596429#comment-16596429
]
Simon Willnauer commented on LUCENE-8471:
-
+1 LGTM
> Expose the number of bytes currently be
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-8458?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16588453#comment-16588453
]
Simon Willnauer commented on LUCENE-8458:
-
LGTM thanks for the extra iteration!
> Carry-o
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-8458?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16587559#comment-16587559
]
Simon Willnauer commented on LUCENE-8458:
-
[~dnhatn] sorry for coming back to this again. I
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-8458?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16587511#comment-16587511
]
Simon Willnauer commented on LUCENE-8458:
-
LGTM
> Carry-over hard-deletes after merge
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-8458?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16586470#comment-16586470
]
Simon Willnauer commented on LUCENE-8458:
-
{quote} 2. If you pass a reader containing hard
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-8458?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16586093#comment-16586093
]
Simon Willnauer commented on LUCENE-8458:
-
here are some comments:
* Instead
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-8458?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16585550#comment-16585550
]
Simon Willnauer commented on LUCENE-8458:
-
Good catch! I do like the change to use SegmentReader
Simon Willnauer created LUCENE-8425:
---
Summary: Expose hard live docs on SegmentReader level
Key: LUCENE-8425
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-8425
Project: Lucene - Core
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-8414?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16553314#comment-16553314
]
Simon Willnauer commented on LUCENE-8414:
-
+1
> CI fails TestIndexWri
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-8414?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16552944#comment-16552944
]
Simon Willnauer commented on LUCENE-8414:
-
patch looks good to me. I do wonder if we, now
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-8384?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16532843#comment-16532843
]
Simon Willnauer edited comment on LUCENE-8384 at 7/4/18 2:52 PM:
-
here
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-8381?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16532819#comment-16532819
]
Simon Willnauer commented on LUCENE-8381:
-
+1 LGTM
> IW counts hard-deletes as soft-dele
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-8381?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16532387#comment-16532387
]
Simon Willnauer commented on LUCENE-8381:
-
I think we should go with the inline patch
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-8381?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16531876#comment-16531876
]
Simon Willnauer commented on LUCENE-8381:
-
[~dnhatn] I hacked together something that I think
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-8381?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Simon Willnauer updated LUCENE-8381:
Attachment: LUCENE-8381.patch
> PendingSoftDeletes#onNewReader should adjust soft-del
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-8381?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16531864#comment-16531864
]
Simon Willnauer commented on LUCENE-8381:
-
[~dnhatn] I do think we have an issue that we might
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-8381?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16531534#comment-16531534
]
Simon Willnauer commented on LUCENE-8381:
-
Nhat good catch. I think we need to adjust the counts
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-8381?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Simon Willnauer reassigned LUCENE-8381:
---
Assignee: Simon Willnauer
> PendingSoftDeletes#onNewReader should adjust s
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-8365?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Simon Willnauer resolved LUCENE-8365.
-
Resolution: Fixed
Fix Version/s: 7.5
master (8.0
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-8365?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16518207#comment-16518207
]
Simon Willnauer commented on LUCENE-8365:
-
fix looks good. I will run tests and pull
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-8365?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Simon Willnauer reassigned LUCENE-8365:
---
Assignee: Simon Willnauer
> ArrayIndexOutOfBoundsException in UnifiedHighligh
> On Tue, Jun 19, 2018 at 7:29 AM, Steve Rowe wrote:
>> Hi Simon,
>>
>> Have you seen the late-February thread “Test failures are out of control….”?
>> :
>> https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/b783a9d7c22f518b07355e8e4f2c6f56020a7c32f36a58a86d51a3b7@%3Cdev.lucene.apache.org%
ok. Some of your questions are answered
> there.
>
> --
> Steve
> www.lucidworks.com
>
>> On Jun 19, 2018, at 9:41 AM, Simon Willnauer
>> wrote:
>>
>> Thanks folks, I appreciate you are sharing some thoughts about this. My
>> biggest issue is th
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-8358?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16513847#comment-16513847
]
Simon Willnauer commented on LUCENE-8358:
-
commit bot might be behind so I'm adding
this issue is fixed
On Fri, Jun 15, 2018 at 10:54 AM, Simon Willnauer
wrote:
> our CI found a failure, I opened a blocker and attached a patch:
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-8358
>
> On Fri, Jun 15, 2018 at 9:15 AM, Simon Willnauer
> wrote:
>> +1 for a
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-8358?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16513575#comment-16513575
]
Simon Willnauer commented on LUCENE-8358:
-
[~jpountz] I think I fixed it now. it was broken
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-8358?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Simon Willnauer updated LUCENE-8358:
Attachment: LUCENE-8358.patch
> Asserting trips when IW tries to free ram by writing
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-8358?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16513563#comment-16513563
]
Simon Willnauer commented on LUCENE-8358:
-
[~jpountz] I attached a new patch
> Asserting tr
101 - 200 of 4317 matches
Mail list logo
