On Apr 20, 2013, at 7:03 AM, Michael McCandless
wrote:
> On Sat, Apr 20, 2013 at 2:43 AM, Steve Rowe wrote:
>> I think another smoke test might be useful: compare the claimed svn revision
>> against the revision in the manifest of each archive to be released, e.g.
>> from the RC2 lucene-core-4
On Sat, Apr 20, 2013 at 2:43 AM, Steve Rowe wrote:
> On Apr 19, 2013, at 6:44 PM, Michael McCandless
> wrote:
>> On Fri, Apr 19, 2013 at 6:36 PM, Chris Hostetter
>> wrote:
>>>
>>> : OK I think a WARNING in smokeTester makes sense ...
>>> :
>>> : But as Hoss said ... figuring out the release bra
Cool, 'svnrevision -c' is recursive and provides a single result, unlike svn
info when run recursively.
On Apr 20, 2013, at 3:29 AM, "Uwe Schindler" wrote:
> "svnversion -c"
> Prints the last changed version after the ":", e.g. compare these outputs:
>
> C:\Users\Uwe Schindler\Projects\lucene\
3, D-28213 Bremen
http://www.thetaphi.de
eMail: u...@thetaphi.de
> -Original Message-
> From: Steve Rowe [mailto:sar...@gmail.com]
> Sent: Saturday, April 20, 2013 8:43 AM
> To: dev@lucene.apache.org
> Subject: Re: [VOTE] Lucene/Solr 4.3 RC1
>
> On Apr 19, 2013, at 6:44
to docs.
Uwe
-
Uwe Schindler
H.-H.-Meier-Allee 63, D-28213 Bremen
http://www.thetaphi.de
eMail: u...@thetaphi.de
> -Original Message-
> From: Steve Rowe [mailto:sar...@gmail.com]
> Sent: Saturday, April 20, 2013 9:11 AM
> To: dev@lucene.apache.org
> Subject: Re: [VO
On Apr 19, 2013, at 6:16 PM, Uwe Schindler wrote:
> I think, maybe Smoketester should compare the revision from the URL in the RC
> vote with the one recorded in the JAR files? Everything else makes no sense
> as the:
> a) The SVN server always replies with the latest committed version on the
>
On Apr 19, 2013, at 6:44 PM, Michael McCandless
wrote:
> On Fri, Apr 19, 2013 at 6:36 PM, Chris Hostetter
> wrote:
>>
>> : OK I think a WARNING in smokeTester makes sense ...
>> :
>> : But as Hoss said ... figuring out the release branch from smokeTester
>> : ... isn't easy. Hmm.
>>
>> At a c
On Fri, Apr 19, 2013 at 6:36 PM, Chris Hostetter
wrote:
>
> : OK I think a WARNING in smokeTester makes sense ...
> :
> : But as Hoss said ... figuring out the release branch from smokeTester
> : ... isn't easy. Hmm.
>
> At a certain point, too much automation is "too much". I already think
> th
: OK I think a WARNING in smokeTester makes sense ...
:
: But as Hoss said ... figuring out the release branch from smokeTester
: ... isn't easy. Hmm.
At a certain point, too much automation is "too much". I already think
the snoke tester is too complicated -- what tests the tester?
It's gre
On Fri, Apr 19, 2013 at 6:19 PM, Robert Muir wrote:
> keep in mind there may not be one in the URL.
>
> Its nice to smoke-test before uploading to your home directory.
> also its useful to run 'ant nightly-smoke' and run a smoke test, and if
> someone commits something while this is happening, its
On Fri, Apr 19, 2013 at 6:16 PM, Uwe Schindler wrote:
> I think, maybe Smoketester should compare the revision from the URL in the RC
> vote with the one recorded in the JAR files?
Hmmm OK ... though, buildAndPushRelease computed that URL from the svn
checkout it build the release from ... so no
: Hmm @hoss did you check this manually, I mean the revision?
ironically, i noticed because i initially tried running the 4x version of
the smoke tester again the RC, and it complained about the duplicated
changes sections. At which point i starting thinking that it was my fault
for using the
D-28213 Bremen
> http://www.thetaphi.de
> eMail: u...@thetaphi.de
>
>
> > -Original Message-
> > From: Michael McCandless [mailto:luc...@mikemccandless.com]
> > Sent: Saturday, April 20, 2013 12:12 AM
> > To: dev@lucene.apache.org; simon.willna...@gmail.com
On Fri, Apr 19, 2013 at 6:12 PM, Michael McCandless
wrote:
> On Fri, Apr 19, 2013 at 6:07 PM, Simon Willnauer
> wrote:
>> Hmm @hoss did you check this manually, I mean the revision?
>>
>> I think our smoketester should check the revision of the release branch and
>> the revision of the RC to make
12:12 AM
> To: dev@lucene.apache.org; simon.willna...@gmail.com
> Cc: Uwe Schindler
> Subject: Re: [VOTE] Lucene/Solr 4.3 RC1
>
> On Fri, Apr 19, 2013 at 6:07 PM, Simon Willnauer
> wrote:
> > Hmm @hoss did you check this manually, I mean the revision?
> >
>
On Fri, Apr 19, 2013 at 6:07 PM, Simon Willnauer
wrote:
> Hmm @hoss did you check this manually, I mean the revision?
>
> I think our smoketester should check the revision of the release branch and
> the revision of the RC to make sure this doesn't happen?
SmokeTester might be too anal? Like som
> -
> >
> > Uwe Schindler
> >
> > H.-H.-Meier-Allee 63, D-28213 Bremen
> >
> > http://www.thetaphi.de
> >
> > eMail: u...@thetaphi.de
> >
> >
> >
> > From: Simon Willnauer [mailto:simon.willna...@gma
; Uwe Schindler
>
> H.-H.-Meier-Allee 63, D-28213 Bremen
>
> http://www.thetaphi.de
>
> eMail: u...@thetaphi.de
>
>
>
> From: Simon Willnauer [mailto:simon.willna...@gmail.com]
> Sent: Friday, April 19, 2013 11:24 PM
> To: dev@lucene.apache.org
>
>
> Subjec
From: Simon Willnauer [mailto:simon.willna...@gmail.com]
Sent: Friday, April 19, 2013 11:24 PM
To: dev@lucene.apache.org
Subject: Re: [VOTE] Lucene/Solr 4.3 RC1
thanks uwe... let me know I will run a new RC once you are done
On Fri, Apr 19, 2013 at 11:11 PM, Uwe Schindler wrote:
Will fi
thanks uwe... let me know I will run a new RC once you are done
On Fri, Apr 19, 2013 at 11:11 PM, Uwe Schindler wrote:
> Will fix soon!
>
>
> Uwe
>
>
>
> Simon Willnauer schrieb:
>>
>> @uwe sure!
>>
>>
>> On Fri, Apr 19, 2013 at 10:48 PM, Uwe Schindler wrote:
>>
>>> Can we fix changes.txt be
Will fix soon!
Uwe
Simon Willnauer schrieb:
>@uwe sure!
>
>
>On Fri, Apr 19, 2013 at 10:48 PM, Uwe Schindler
>wrote:
>
>> Can we fix changes.txt before that?
>>
>> Uwe
>>
>>
>>
>> Simon Willnauer schrieb:
>>
>>> ah man, good call! that is my fault. I know what went wrong here.
>Damned!
>>>
@uwe sure!
On Fri, Apr 19, 2013 at 10:48 PM, Uwe Schindler wrote:
> Can we fix changes.txt before that?
>
> Uwe
>
>
>
> Simon Willnauer schrieb:
>
>> ah man, good call! that is my fault. I know what went wrong here. Damned!
>>
>> ok that means I need to respin that one. This might take a while
Can we fix changes.txt before that?
Uwe
Simon Willnauer schrieb:
>ah man, good call! that is my fault. I know what went wrong here.
>Damned!
>
>ok that means I need to respin that one. This might take a while on my
>end.
>
>sorry about that.
>
>simon
>
>
>On Fri, Apr 19, 2013 at 10:25 PM, Chr
ah man, good call! that is my fault. I know what went wrong here. Damned!
ok that means I need to respin that one. This might take a while on my end.
sorry about that.
simon
On Fri, Apr 19, 2013 at 10:25 PM, Chris Hostetter
wrote:
>
> :
> http://people.apache.org/~simonw/staging_area/lucene-s
:
http://people.apache.org/~simonw/staging_area/lucene-solr-4.3.0-RC1-rev1469340/
Hmmm? ... r1469340 is from "Thu Apr 18 14:20:33 2013 UTC"
FWIW: There were several changes made after r1469340 (but well before the
proposed "Friday 36 hours from now") to try and clean up the release notes
and
+1 - somke tester passes for me.
On Apr 19, 2013, at 2:18 AM, Simon Willnauer wrote:
> http://people.apache.org/~simonw/staging_area/lucene-solr-4.3.0-RC1-rev1469340/
>
> Thanks everybody for the hard work!
>
> Smoke tester says: SUCCESS!
> Integration into ES is successful!
>
> there is my +1
Thanks Simon! Getting my smoke tester ready…
- Mark
On Apr 19, 2013, at 2:18 AM, Simon Willnauer wrote:
> http://people.apache.org/~simonw/staging_area/lucene-solr-4.3.0-RC1-rev1469340/
>
> Thanks everybody for the hard work!
>
> Smoke tester says: SUCCESS!
> Integration into ES is successful
From: Robert Muir [mailto:rcm...@gmail.com]
Sent: Friday, April 19, 2013 2:45 PM
To: dev@lucene.apache.org
Cc: simon.willna...@gmail.com
Subject: Re: [VOTE] Lucene/Solr 4.3 RC1
On Fri, Apr 19, 2013 at 8:25 AM, Uwe Schindler wrote:
Hi,
I am still reviewing. I have one note abo
On Fri, Apr 19, 2013 at 8:25 AM, Uwe Schindler wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I am still reviewing. I have one note about the changes.txt where we miss
> a backwards break:
>
> * https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-4877 made the
> AnalysisFactories require to have a non-default ctor, otherwise a
> Met
-Original Message-
> From: Simon Willnauer [mailto:simon.willna...@gmail.com]
> Sent: Friday, April 19, 2013 8:18 AM
> To: dev@lucene.apache.org
> Subject: [VOTE] Lucene/Solr 4.3 RC1
>
> http://people.apache.org/~simonw/staging_area/lucene-solr-4.3.0-RC1-
> rev146934
+1 The smoker tester ran successful!
On 19 April 2013 08:18, Simon Willnauer wrote:
>
> http://people.apache.org/~simonw/staging_area/lucene-solr-4.3.0-RC1-rev1469340/
>
> Thanks everybody for the hard work!
>
> Smoke tester says: SUCCESS!
> Integration into ES is successful!
>
> there is my +1
http://people.apache.org/~simonw/staging_area/lucene-solr-4.3.0-RC1-rev1469340/
Thanks everybody for the hard work!
Smoke tester says: SUCCESS!
Integration into ES is successful!
there is my +1
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-uns
32 matches
Mail list logo
