[RESULT][VOTE] Release Lucene/Solr 6.0.1 RC2

This vote has passed. Thanks to all who voted! I’ll start publishing stuff now. -- Steve www.lucidworks.com > On May 27, 2016, at 3:02 AM, Shalin Shekhar Mangar > wrote: > > +1 > > SUCCESS! [1:10:04.644047] > > On Tue, May 24, 2016 at 9:43 AM, Steve Rowe

Re: [VOTE] Release Lucene/Solr 6.0.1 RC2

+1 SUCCESS! [1:10:04.644047] On Tue, May 24, 2016 at 9:43 AM, Steve Rowe wrote: > Please vote for release candidate 2 for Lucene/Solr 6.0.1. (I found a > couple problems in CHANGES after I committed RC1 to Subversion, so I didn’t > call the vote, and cut RC2 instead.) > >

Re: [VOTE] Release Lucene/Solr 6.0.1 RC2

+1 SUCCESS! [0:55:13.784752] Le jeu. 26 mai 2016 à 08:49, Tomás Fernández Löbbe a écrit : > +1 > SUCCESS! [1:13:52.067157] > > On Wed, May 25, 2016 at 2:52 PM, Michael McCandless < > luc...@mikemccandless.com> wrote: > >> Thanks Steve. >> >> Mike McCandless >> >>

Re: [VOTE] Release Lucene/Solr 6.0.1 RC2

+1 SUCCESS! [1:13:52.067157] On Wed, May 25, 2016 at 2:52 PM, Michael McCandless < luc...@mikemccandless.com> wrote: > Thanks Steve. > > Mike McCandless > > http://blog.mikemccandless.com > > On Wed, May 25, 2016 at 4:45 PM, Steve Rowe wrote: > >> >> > On May 25, 2016, at

Re: [VOTE] Release Lucene/Solr 6.0.1 RC2

Thanks Steve. Mike McCandless http://blog.mikemccandless.com On Wed, May 25, 2016 at 4:45 PM, Steve Rowe wrote: > > > On May 25, 2016, at 11:27 AM, David Smiley > wrote: > > > > The problem I had was that I was on branch_6x not the release branch.

Re: [VOTE] Release Lucene/Solr 6.0.1 RC2

> On May 25, 2016, at 11:27 AM, David Smiley wrote: > > The problem I had was that I was on branch_6x not the release branch. I > thought it'd be good enough but apparently not. > > On Wed, May 25, 2016 at 9:13 AM Steve Rowe wrote: > >> On May

Re: [VOTE] Release Lucene/Solr 6.0.1 RC2

Il giorno mer 25 mag 2016 alle ore 15:12 Steve Rowe ha scritto: > Hi Tommaso, > > You and Anshum are getting that warning because you don’t trust me - or > rather: neither you nor anybody you trust has signed my code signing key. > > Yesterday Anshum and I signed each other’s

Re: [VOTE] Release Lucene/Solr 6.0.1 RC2

+1 -Yonik On Tue, May 24, 2016 at 12:13 AM, Steve Rowe wrote: > Please vote for release candidate 2 for Lucene/Solr 6.0.1. (I found a couple > problems in CHANGES after I committed RC1 to Subversion, so I didn’t call the > vote, and cut RC2 instead.) > > The artifacts can

Re: [VOTE] Release Lucene/Solr 6.0.1 RC2

+1 SUCCESS! [0:49:14.757238] The problem I had was that I was on branch_6x not the release branch. I thought it'd be good enough but apparently not. On Wed, May 25, 2016 at 9:13 AM Steve Rowe wrote: > Hi David, > > I think this is a result of the JDK naming stuff that Uwe

Re: [VOTE] Release Lucene/Solr 6.0.1 RC2

Hi David, I think this is a result of the JDK naming stuff that Uwe has been working on (e.g. 1.8->8) to enable JDK9 usage - but AFAIK that’s not on branch_6_0: > On May 25, 2016, at 12:48 AM, David Smiley wrote: > [...] > RuntimeError: JAR file >

Re: [VOTE] Release Lucene/Solr 6.0.1 RC2

Hi Tommaso, You and Anshum are getting that warning because you don’t trust me - or rather: neither you nor anybody you trust has signed my code signing key. Yesterday Anshum and I signed each other’s code signing keys and uploaded them, and I’m willing to do that with others. -- Steve

Re: [VOTE] Release Lucene/Solr 6.0.1 RC2

David did you use master's smoke tester? You must use the version on 6.0.x. Mike McCandless http://blog.mikemccandless.com On Wed, May 25, 2016 at 12:48 AM, David Smiley wrote: > I tried to run the smoke tester directly on my machine and it failed right > after

Re: [VOTE] Release Lucene/Solr 6.0.1 RC2

+1 SUCCESS! [1:00:26.085469] On Wednesday, May 25, 2016 11:27 AM, Tommaso Teofili wrote: got the same warning on the GPG key signature but could not reproduce David's issue, not sure what it could be though. I'd say if no one else can reproduce it let's go

Re: [VOTE] Release Lucene/Solr 6.0.1 RC2

got the same warning on the GPG key signature but could not reproduce David's issue, not sure what it could be though. I'd say if no one else can reproduce it let's go ahead with the release. +1 on my side. SUCCESS! [1:19:14.997834] Regards, Tommaso Il giorno mer 25 mag 2016 alle ore 06:48

Re: [VOTE] Release Lucene/Solr 6.0.1 RC2

I tried to run the smoke tester directly on my machine and it failed right after unpacking. Given other's success, it must be user error. What might the problem be? unpack lucene-6.0.1.tgz... verify JAR metadata/identity/no javax.* or java.* classes... Traceback (most recent call last):

Re: [VOTE] Release Lucene/Solr 6.0.1 RC2

Thanks for doing the release, Steve. All looks good to me but I think you should get someone to sign you GPG key :) I see this warning while running the tests: GPG: gpg: WARNING: This key is not certified with a trusted signature! Here's my +1! SUCCESS! [1:05:50.755245] On Tue, May 24, 2016

Re: [VOTE] Release Lucene/Solr 6.0.1 RC2

+1 SUCCESS! [0:31:57.451386] Mike McCandless http://blog.mikemccandless.com On Tue, May 24, 2016 at 12:13 AM, Steve Rowe wrote: > Please vote for release candidate 2 for Lucene/Solr 6.0.1. (I found a > couple problems in CHANGES after I committed RC1 to Subversion, so I

[VOTE] Release Lucene/Solr 6.0.1 RC2

Please vote for release candidate 2 for Lucene/Solr 6.0.1. (I found a couple problems in CHANGES after I committed RC1 to Subversion, so I didn’t call the vote, and cut RC2 instead.) The artifacts can be downloaded from: