[jira] [Commented] (LUCENE-7440) Document skipping on large indexes is broken

2017-02-08 Thread Adrien Grand (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-7440?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15857817#comment-15857817 ] Adrien Grand commented on LUCENE-7440: -- For the record, I verified that Test2BPostings passes on the

[jira] [Commented] (LUCENE-7440) Document skipping on large indexes is broken

2017-02-08 Thread ASF subversion and git services (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-7440?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15857788#comment-15857788 ] ASF subversion and git services commented on LUCENE-7440: - Commit

[jira] [Commented] (LUCENE-7440) Document skipping on large indexes is broken

2016-09-12 Thread Yonik Seeley (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-7440?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15484994#comment-15484994 ] Yonik Seeley commented on LUCENE-7440: -- bq. Would this be faster to test if we configure a larger

[jira] [Commented] (LUCENE-7440) Document skipping on large indexes is broken

2016-09-12 Thread Mike Drob (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-7440?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15484634#comment-15484634 ] Mike Drob commented on LUCENE-7440: --- bq. Regarding the 1.8B docs number... at least in my tests I saw

[jira] [Commented] (LUCENE-7440) Document skipping on large indexes is broken

2016-09-12 Thread ASF subversion and git services (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-7440?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15483925#comment-15483925 ] ASF subversion and git services commented on LUCENE-7440: - Commit

[jira] [Commented] (LUCENE-7440) Document skipping on large indexes is broken

2016-09-10 Thread ASF subversion and git services (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-7440?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15480369#comment-15480369 ] ASF subversion and git services commented on LUCENE-7440: - Commit

[jira] [Commented] (LUCENE-7440) Document skipping on large indexes is broken

2016-09-10 Thread ASF subversion and git services (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-7440?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15480355#comment-15480355 ] ASF subversion and git services commented on LUCENE-7440: - Commit

[jira] [Commented] (LUCENE-7440) Document skipping on large indexes is broken

2016-09-10 Thread Uwe Schindler (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-7440?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15480081#comment-15480081 ] Uwe Schindler commented on LUCENE-7440: --- +1 > Document skipping on large indexes is broken >

[jira] [Commented] (LUCENE-7440) Document skipping on large indexes is broken

2016-09-09 Thread Uwe Schindler (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-7440?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15478450#comment-15478450 ] Uwe Schindler commented on LUCENE-7440: --- +1 compareUnsigned is the way to go! It's an intrinsic,

[jira] [Commented] (LUCENE-7440) Document skipping on large indexes is broken

2016-09-09 Thread Michael McCandless (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-7440?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15477697#comment-15477697 ] Michael McCandless commented on LUCENE-7440: bq. Another alternative would be to use

[jira] [Commented] (LUCENE-7440) Document skipping on large indexes is broken

2016-09-09 Thread Robert Muir (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-7440?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15477628#comment-15477628 ] Robert Muir commented on LUCENE-7440: - Another alternative would be to use Integer.compareUnsigned()

[jira] [Commented] (LUCENE-7440) Document skipping on large indexes is broken

2016-09-09 Thread Michael McCandless (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-7440?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15477613#comment-15477613 ] Michael McCandless commented on LUCENE-7440: What a nice find! I would rather we just use

[jira] [Commented] (LUCENE-7440) Document skipping on large indexes is broken

2016-09-09 Thread Uwe Schindler (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-7440?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15477238#comment-15477238 ] Uwe Schindler commented on LUCENE-7440: --- Fix with negative check looks fine to me, this should be

[jira] [Commented] (LUCENE-7440) Document skipping on large indexes is broken

2016-09-09 Thread Yonik Seeley (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-7440?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15477144#comment-15477144 ] Yonik Seeley commented on LUCENE-7440: -- Regarding the 1.8B docs number... at least in my tests I saw

[jira] [Commented] (LUCENE-7440) Document skipping on large indexes is broken

2016-09-09 Thread Uwe Schindler (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-7440?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15477131#comment-15477131 ] Uwe Schindler commented on LUCENE-7440: --- Nice findings. A really old bug! > Document skipping on

[jira] [Commented] (LUCENE-7440) Document skipping on large indexes is broken

2016-09-09 Thread Yonik Seeley (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-7440?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15477039#comment-15477039 ] Yonik Seeley commented on LUCENE-7440: -- Patch coming... was waiting for tests to pass. > Document

[jira] [Commented] (LUCENE-7440) Document skipping on large indexes is broken

2016-09-09 Thread Dawid Weiss (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-7440?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15476155#comment-15476155 ] Dawid Weiss commented on LUCENE-7440: - Yonik, what exactly is broken? Do you have a stack trace or