Re: Lucene/Solr 7.7.2

ps://www.thetaphi.de <https://www.thetaphi.de/> >>> eMail: u...@thetaphi.de <mailto:u...@thetaphi.de> >>> >>> From: Jan Høydahl mailto:jan@cominvent.com>> >>> Sent: Thursday, May 16, 2019 6:20 PM >>> To: dev@lucene.apache.org <ma

[RESULT] [VOTE] Release Lucene/Solr 7.7.2 RC1

> >> +1 >> >> SUCCESS! [0:51:25.880324] >> >> On Wed, May 29, 2019 at 5:24 AM Jan Høydahl wrote: >>> >>> Please vote for release candidate 1 for Lucene/Solr 7.7.2 >>> >>> The artifacts can be downloaded from: >>> ht

Re: [VOTE] Release Lucene/Solr 7.7.2 RC1

M Jan Høydahl wrote: >> >> Please vote for release candidate 1 for Lucene/Solr 7.7.2 >> >> The artifacts can be downloaded from: >> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/lucene/lucene-solr-7.7.2-RC1-revd4c30fc2856154f2c1fefc589eb7cd070a415b94 >> >> Yo

Re: [VOTE] Release Lucene/Solr 7.7.2 RC1

+1 SUCCESS! [1:44:46.792802] > On 31 May 2019, at 14:45, Shalin Shekhar Mangar > wrote: > > +1 > > SUCCESS! [0:51:25.880324] > > On Wed, May 29, 2019 at 5:24 AM Jan Høydahl <mailto:jan@cominvent.com>> wrote: > Please vote for release candidate 1 for

Re: [VOTE] Release Lucene/Solr 7.7.2 RC1

+1 SUCCESS! [0:51:25.880324] On Wed, May 29, 2019 at 5:24 AM Jan Høydahl wrote: > Please vote for release candidate 1 for Lucene/Solr 7.7.2 > > The artifacts can be downloaded from: > > https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/lucene/lucene

Re: [VOTE] Release Lucene/Solr 7.7.2 RC1

The log file is the stout/err from gpg, and its encoding is probably depending on system Terminal default. Therefore it should be opened also using system default encoding, not hard coded to USF-8. Feel free to open a Jira for this. I won’t be able to look at this before Tuesday. Sendt fra min

Re: [VOTE] Release Lucene/Solr 7.7.2 RC1

It’s failing for me in every place where the keys are read using ‘utf-8’. Changing it to ISO-8859-1 “fixes” this error but it’s not clear to me why this is happening in my environment and not in others'. > On 30 May 2019, at 17:13, Jan Høydahl wrote: > > Try with encoding=‘ISO-8859-1’ in this

Re: [VOTE] Release Lucene/Solr 7.7.2 RC1

Try with encoding=‘ISO-8859-1’ in this line: https://github.com/apache/lucene-solr/blob/faaee86efb01fa6e431fcb129cfb956c7d62d514/dev-tools/scripts/smokeTestRelease.py#L378 Jan Høydahl > 30. mai 2019 kl. 15:21 skrev Jan Høydahl : > > Hmm 0xf8 is the ascii code for letter «ø» which is part of

Re: [VOTE] Release Lucene/Solr 7.7.2 RC1

Hmm 0xf8 is the ascii code for letter «ø» which is part of my surname and probably in my gpg key. Sounds like the keys file is attempted parsed as utf-8 but is ISO encoded or something? Can you check exactly what line of smoketester script that barfs? Jan Høydahl > 30. mai 2019 kl. 15:06

Re: [VOTE] Release Lucene/Solr 7.7.2 RC1

Hi, For some reason I’m getting the following error (Mac OSX Mojave, clean checkout of branch_7_7): JAVA_HOME=/Library/Java/JavaVirtualMachines/jdk1.8.0_121.jdk/Contents/Home python3 -u dev-tools/scripts/smokeTestRelease.py https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/lucene/lucene-solr-7.7.2-RC1

Re: [VOTE] Release Lucene/Solr 7.7.2 RC1

Hi, +1 Tested with my application that uses just Lucene, no Solr. Regards, Martin On Wed, May 29, 2019 at 2:54 AM Jan Høydahl wrote: > Please vote for release candidate 1 for Lucene/Solr 7.7.2 > > The artifacts can be downloaded from: > > https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/de

Re: [VOTE] Release Lucene/Solr 7.7.2 RC1

I don't get a vote, but smoke tests pass for me. On 29/05/2019 01:54, Jan Høydahl wrote: > Please vote for release candidate 1 for Lucene/Solr 7.7.2 > > The artifacts can be downloaded from: > https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/lucene/lucene-so

Re: Lucene/Solr 7.7.2

>> >> Uwe >> >> - >> Uwe Schindler >> Achterdiek 19, D-28357 Bremen >> https://www.thetaphi.de <https://www.thetaphi.de/> >> eMail: u...@thetaphi.de <mailto:u...@thetaphi.de> >> >> From: Jan Høydahl mailto:jan@co

Re: [VOTE] Release Lucene/Solr 7.7.2 RC1

+1 SUCCESS! [1:14:45.390365] Kevin Risden On Tue, May 28, 2019 at 7:54 PM Jan Høydahl wrote: > Please vote for release candidate 1 for Lucene/Solr 7.7.2 > > The artifacts can be downloaded from: > > https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/lucene/lucene

[VOTE] Release Lucene/Solr 7.7.2 RC1

Please vote for release candidate 1 for Lucene/Solr 7.7.2 The artifacts can be downloaded from: https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/lucene/lucene-solr-7.7.2-RC1-revd4c30fc2856154f2c1fefc589eb7cd070a415b94 You can run the smoke tester directly with this command: python3 -u dev-tools/scripts

Re: Lucene/Solr 7.7.2

hetaphi.de <https://www.thetaphi.de/> > eMail: u...@thetaphi.de <mailto:u...@thetaphi.de> > > From: Jan Høydahl > Sent: Thursday, May 16, 2019 6:20 PM > To: dev@lucene.apache.org > Subject: Re: Lucene/Solr 7.7.2 > > Here is the first draft of the release notes for Luce

RE: Lucene/Solr 7.7.2

iek 19, D-28357 Bremen https://www.thetaphi.de eMail: u...@thetaphi.de From: Jan Høydahl Sent: Thursday, May 16, 2019 6:20 PM To: dev@lucene.apache.org Subject: Re: Lucene/Solr 7.7.2 Here is the first draft of the release notes for Lucene and Solr 7.7.2 https://wiki.apache.org/lucen

Re: Lucene/Solr 7.7.2

However, changes from all these commits have been already incorporated into branch_7_7 in these commits: fd2851a8d80e81835b45c47ac183282831f30764 2de07e64a959ee380b8bb0159c6193055c969492 > On 16 May 2019, at 18:50, Jan Høydahl wrote: > > I merged cde00b9a84f3d57252d34daaa77f2b56cf9802cb. >

Re: Lucene/Solr 7.7.2

Andrzej you are right, the three other commits I listed are already in the branch, then SOLR-12833 is done. Thanks. -- Jan Høydahl, search solution architect Cominvent AS - www.cominvent.com > 16. mai 2019 kl. 18:50 skrev Jan Høydahl : > > I merged cde00b9a84f3d57252d34daaa77f2b56cf9802cb. >

Re: Lucene/Solr 7.7.2

I merged cde00b9a84f3d57252d34daaa77f2b56cf9802cb. These commits are not in branch_7_7 either: 77cf083e1417e4ac910f06626ae3cb6c3c77a32b Fix PeerSyncTest and TestInPlaceUpdatesDistrib failures Ishan Chattopadhyaya 2019-05-02 23:06 d9d3c89e3e50f8acee4ad07fff8cd448e2b9b585

Re: Lucene/Solr 7.7.2

Here is the first draft of the release notes for Lucene and Solr 7.7.2 https://wiki.apache.org/lucene-java/ReleaseNote772 https://wiki.apache.org/solr/ReleaseNote772 I see no reason for choosing some of the 25 Solr bug fixes to highlight. Some of them are high imact and some are security

Re: Lucene/Solr 7.7.2

Bulk of SOLR-12833 (including recent changes) should already be there because it was committed to branch_7_7, with the exception of cde00b9a84f3d57252d34daaa77f2b56cf9802cb which still needs to be merged to 7_7 and now to 7_7_2. > On 16 May 2019, at 17:38, Jan Høydahl wrote: > > So now

Re: Lucene/Solr 7.7.2

Did you include the one that disables Jetty directory listings? Am May 16, 2019 3:38:32 PM UTC schrieb "Jan Høydahl" : >So now backCompat indices for 6.6.6 are pushed, smoketester should be >happy. > >I have also backported these JIRAs, ready to push to branch_7_7, >currently running tests: >

Re: Lucene/Solr 7.7.2

So now backCompat indices for 6.6.6 are pushed, smoketester should be happy. I have also backported these JIRAs, ready to push to branch_7_7, currently running tests: SOLR-13229: Cleanup replicasMetTragicEvent after all exceptions SOLR-13352: Remove risk of deadlock/threadleak when shutting

Re: Lucene/Solr 7.7.2

> I would like to backport SOLR-13410, as without this the ADDROLE of > "overseer" is effectively broken. Please let me know if that is fine. Just backported this. Hope there's still some time for a Jenkins run or two. On Tue, May 14, 2019 at 2:48 PM Jan Høydahl wrote: > > Jenkins jobs for 7_7

Re: Lucene/Solr 7.7.2

Jenkins jobs for 7_7 were enabled today. Will build the first RC once we the results of the first few runs. -- Jan Høydahl, search solution architect Cominvent AS - www.cominvent.com > 10. mai 2019 kl. 21:16 skrev Kevin Risden : > > Finished backport of SOLR-13112 for Jackson 2.9.8 > > Kevin

Re: Lucene/Solr 7.7.2

Finished backport of SOLR-13112 for Jackson 2.9.8 Kevin Risden On Thu, May 9, 2019 at 6:57 PM Jan Høydahl wrote: > Looks safe to backport, go ahead! > > -- > Jan Høydahl, search solution architect > Cominvent AS - www.cominvent.com > > 9. mai 2019 kl. 23:07 skrev Cassandra Targett : > >

Re: Lucene/Solr 7.7.2

Looks safe to backport, go ahead! -- Jan Høydahl, search solution architect Cominvent AS - www.cominvent.com > 9. mai 2019 kl. 23:07 skrev Cassandra Targett : > > Someone brought https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-13112 > to my

Re: Lucene/Solr 7.7.2

Someone brought https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-13112 to my attention today, which upgraded the Jackson dependencies to 2.9.8. Would it be possible for those to be backported to branch_7_7 for inclusion in 7.7.2? Cassandra On May 8, 2019, 2:51 PM -0500, Jan Høydahl , wrote: > Yes

Re: Lucene/Solr 7.7.2

Yes please do! -- Jan Høydahl, search solution architect Cominvent AS - www.cominvent.com > 8. mai 2019 kl. 18:25 skrev Ishan Chattopadhyaya : > > I would like to backport SOLR-13410, as without this the ADDROLE of > "overseer" is effectively broken. Please let me know if that is fine. > > On

Re: Lucene/Solr 7.7.2

I would like to backport SOLR-13410, as without this the ADDROLE of "overseer" is effectively broken. Please let me know if that is fine. On Sat, May 4, 2019 at 2:22 AM Jan Høydahl wrote: > > Sure, go ahead! > > -- > Jan Høydahl, search solution architect > Cominvent AS - www.cominvent.com > >

Re: Lucene/Solr 7.7.2

Sure, go ahead! -- Jan Høydahl, search solution architect Cominvent AS - www.cominvent.com > 3. mai 2019 kl. 17:53 skrev Andrzej Białecki > : > > Hi, > > I would like to back-port the recent changes in the re-opened SOLR-12833, > since the increased memory consumption adversely affects

Re: Lucene/Solr 7.7.2

Hi, I would like to back-port the recent changes in the re-opened SOLR-12833, since the increased memory consumption adversely affects existing 7x users. > On 3 May 2019, at 10:38, Jan Høydahl wrote: > > To not confuse two releases at the same time, I'll delay the first 7.7.2 RC > until

Lucene/Solr 7.7.2

To not confuse two releases at the same time, I'll delay the first 7.7.2 RC until after a successful 8.1 vote. Uwe, can you re-enable the Jenkins 7.7 jobs to make sure we have a healthy branch_7_7? Feel free to push important bug fixes to the branch in the meantime, announcing them in this