Re: Failures under JDK 9, 10, 11

2018-11-06 Thread David Smiley
I think even if we next support 11 as a minimum version, it's still useful to test with the intermediate versions since our users are using them now. On Tue, Nov 6, 2018 at 11:34 AM Erick Erickson wrote: > I didn't mean to suggest we switch to 11 as a minimum now, rather I > meant to say "If

Re: Failures under JDK 9, 10, 11

2018-11-06 Thread Erick Erickson
I didn't mean to suggest we switch to 11 as a minimum now, rather I meant to say "If the next supported version will be 11 (whenever it's stable enough), does it make sense to stop testing 9 and 10 now?". A better question would have been "do we ever expect to have Java 9 or 10 as the minimum

RE: Failures under JDK 9, 10, 11

2018-11-06 Thread Uwe Schindler
Hi, > Do we have any plans to release any Solr with minimal versions 9 or > 10? I'm wondering if it makes sense to stop testing 9 and 10 and plan > on the next supported Java version being 11 (whenever we do that). I don't think, we should now switch to Java 11 as minimum version yet. I'd