Re: [JENKINS] Lucene-Solr-SmokeRelease-4.2.1 - Build # 11 - Still Failing

2013-04-01 Thread Michael McCandless
On Mon, Apr 1, 2013 at 12:32 PM, Chris Hostetter wrote: > > : But this could just be a stupid bug in smokeTester. All it looks for > : is "Started SocketConnector@0.0.0.0:8983" in the server's stderr > : output. Maybe this is too brittle? > > Solr's SLF4J logging recently changed to use log4j as

Re: [JENKINS] Lucene-Solr-SmokeRelease-4.2.1 - Build # 11 - Still Failing

2013-04-01 Thread Chris Hostetter
: But this could just be a stupid bug in smokeTester. All it looks for : is "Started SocketConnector@0.0.0.0:8983" in the server's stderr : output. Maybe this is too brittle? Solr's SLF4J logging recently changed to use log4j as the binding in th example & tests instead of JUL. With that chan

Re: [JENKINS] Lucene-Solr-SmokeRelease-4.2.1 - Build # 11 - Still Failing

2013-03-31 Thread Robert Muir
On Sun, Mar 31, 2013 at 6:42 PM, Michael McCandless < luc...@mikemccandless.com> wrote: > On Sun, Mar 31, 2013 at 6:23 PM, Robert Muir wrote: > > hmm there goes that theory. Maybe its just a leftover process that didn't > > get killed from a previous smoketester: I think to be safe the python > c

Re: [JENKINS] Lucene-Solr-SmokeRelease-4.2.1 - Build # 11 - Still Failing

2013-03-31 Thread Michael McCandless
On Sun, Mar 31, 2013 at 6:23 PM, Robert Muir wrote: > hmm there goes that theory. Maybe its just a leftover process that didn't > get killed from a previous smoketester: I think to be safe the python code > should always terminate the server it starts with 'kill -9' and nothing > else! It does ki

Re: [JENKINS] Lucene-Solr-SmokeRelease-4.2.1 - Build # 11 - Still Failing

2013-03-31 Thread Steve Rowe
I think there's only one executor on the lucene slave, though, so no concurrent jobs. On Mar 31, 2013, at 6:15 PM, Robert Muir wrote: > Maybe the fact we now have this 4.2.1-SmokeRelease job (didnt the vote pass?) > created a situation where two smoke-testing jobs (e.g. 5.x and 4.2.1 or > som

Re: [JENKINS] Lucene-Solr-SmokeRelease-4.2.1 - Build # 11 - Still Failing

2013-03-31 Thread Steve Rowe
Good point. I'll take down all the 4.2.1 jobs. Steve On Mar 31, 2013, at 6:15 PM, Robert Muir wrote: > Maybe the fact we now have this 4.2.1-SmokeRelease job (didnt the vote pass?) > created a situation where two smoke-testing jobs (e.g. 5.x and 4.2.1 or > something) were running concurrentl

Re: [JENKINS] Lucene-Solr-SmokeRelease-4.2.1 - Build # 11 - Still Failing

2013-03-31 Thread Michael McCandless
Hmm cascading errors. First, the 4.x smoke tester failed because Solr's example (java -jar start.jar) took more than 30 minutes to start: https://builds.apache.org/job/Lucene-Solr-SmokeRelease-4.x/61/console But then because of a bug in the smoke tester, it left this server running, which th