Re: Persian Implementation

2011-07-19 Thread Robert Muir
On Tue, Jul 19, 2011 at 11:03 AM, Patrick Estarian wrote: > That's great! thanks! > > Now, would you please answer my original questions? > > 1- contact of the developer who did the Persian classes? dev@lucene.apache.org :) here is the original issue with discussion: https://issues.apache.org/ji

Re: Persian Implementation

2011-07-19 Thread Patrick Estarian
That's great! thanks! Now, would you please answer my original questions? 1- contact of the developer who did the Persian classes? 2- from which class I can start making my own TokenStream that holds a few of the previous tokens? (or is there already something like that in the existing classes?)

Re: Persian Implementation

2011-07-19 Thread Robert Muir
On Mon, Jul 18, 2011 at 11:37 PM, Patrick Estarian wrote: > Robert, > > Thank you very much for the reply. > > If I understand it correctly, you have a main project and a contrib section. > It is very important for us to have this Persian search work "correctly" > rather than efficient. Would this

Re: Persian Implementation

2011-07-18 Thread Patrick Estarian
Robert, Thank you very much for the reply. If I understand it correctly, you have a main project and a contrib section. It is very important for us to have this Persian search work "correctly" rather than efficient. Would this be a good candidate for the contrib section if I wrote some codes for

Re: Persian Implementation

2011-07-18 Thread Robert Muir
On Mon, Jul 18, 2011 at 6:24 PM, Patrick Estarian wrote: > Hi, > > I am trying to get the Persian part of Lucene to work but apparently the > current implementation is just a simple version of sopt word tokenizer and > no stemmer, etc. I was trying to find the contact of the person who had done >