Meant to send an update on this yesterday...Hoss and I have made most
of the changes we want to make for the conversion and I'm working on
merging the branch with master now.
This should be done today, and then we'll be able to backport it into
branch_6_x and branch_6_6.
On Tue, May 9, 2017 at
> I feel like it'd be less confusing if we hold *release* of 6.6.0 until
> we have the ref guide content merged and migrated - even though the
> release of the Ref Guide will remain as a separate vote for the time
> being. And it will of course be easier to merge the branch with master
> &
I've now made the change to the Ref Guide to lock it from editing by
committers.
I left access for confluence-administrators, which I believe is INFRA
and Uwe but possibly others too. If you find you do still have access,
please don't edit anything.
On Wed, May 3, 2017 at 4:06 PM, Cassandra
I feel like it'd be less confusing if we hold *release* of 6.6.0 until
we have the ref guide content merged and migrated - even though the
release of the Ref Guide will remain as a separate vote for the time
being. And it will of course be easier to merge the branch with master
& backport to
> I personally would like to push it back at day or two to finish one
ticket and get the everything into CHANGES.txt.
Sure Joel, that works with me.
On Thu, May 4, 2017 at 12:58 AM, Joel Bernstein wrote:
> I like the idea of having the new ref guide for 6.6. The Streaming
>
I like the idea of having the new ref guide for 6.6. The Streaming
Expressions wiki page has been completely overwhelmed with content at this
point and I'd like to see how we can better organize these docs for the 6.6
release.
I have started a thread on cutting the 6.6 branch. I personally would
Hi Cassandra,
> If we start this conversion soon, we'll have the new Ref Guide for
> Solr 6.6, which personally I'd like to do to get acclimated to the
> process before the major edits that we'll need to do for 7.0.
> ...
> Once we have the content migrated, we can merge the branch
>
+1, thanks for all your work on this (Hoss too!)
On Tue, May 2, 2017 at 12:25 PM, Cassandra Targett
wrote:
> Hi -
>
> I wanted to maximize eyeballs on this, so sending to the list instead
> of as a comment in an issue.
>
> I believe we are at the point where we can lock